DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자망 선택성에서 다항식을 사용한 경우의 Kitahara에 의한 최소제곱법과 최우법의 차이

The difference of selectivity of gill net between least square method with polynomials in Kitahara's and maximum likelihood analysis

  • 박해훈 (국립수산과학원 시스템공학과) ;
  • ;
  • 배봉성 (동해수산연구소 해역산업과) ;
  • 안희춘 (동해수산연구소 해역산업과) ;
  • 황선재 (국립수산과학원 자원연구과)
  • Park, Hae-Hoon (Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Millar, Russell B. (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland) ;
  • Bae, Bong-Seong (East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, NFRDI) ;
  • An, Heui-Chun (East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, NFRDI) ;
  • Hwang, Seon-Jae (Fisheries Resources Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute)
  • 투고 : 2010.06.04
  • 심사 : 2010.08.16
  • 발행 : 2010.08.31

초록

This paper showed the difference between the selectivity of gill net by least square method with polynomials in Kitahara's and that by maximum likelihood analysis for Japanese sandfish and Korean flounder. Catch experiments for Japanese sandfish using commercial vessels off the eastern coast of Korea were conducted with six different mesh sizes between October and December 2007 and those for Korean flounder with five different mesh sizes between 2008 and 2009. The mesh size of 50% probability of catch corresponding to biological maturity length of fish was not different between that by least square method and that by maximum likelihood analysis for Japanese sandfish, however, a little different for Korean flounder, that is, those mesh sizes of 50% probability of catch for biological maturity length of Korean flounder were 10.6cm and 10.1cm by least square method and maximum likelihood analysis, respectively.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 국립수산과학원

참고문헌

  1. Fujimori, Y., T. Tokai, S. Hiyama and K. Matuda, 1996. Selectivity and gear efficiency of trammel nets for kuruma prawn (Penaeus japonicus). Fish. Res., 26, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(95)00392-4
  2. Fujimori, Y. and T. Tokai, 2001. Estimation of gillnwt selectivity curve by maximum likelihood method. Fisheries Science, 67, 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00301.x
  3. Hiramatsu, K., 1992. A statistical study of fish popultion dynamics using maximum likelihood methodparameter estimation and model selection-. Bull. Nat. Res. Inst. Far Seas. Fish., 29, 57-114.
  4. Jeong, E.C., H.H. Park, B.S. Bae, D.S. Chang, C.S., Kim, S.H. Choi and H.K. Cha, 2009. Size selectivity of gill net for male Japanese sandfish (Arctoscopus japonicus) off Gangwon in winter. J. Kor. Fish. Soc., 42, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.1.078
  5. Kim, S.H. and J.H. Lee, 2002. Mesh selectivity in trammel net for flat fish. Bull. Kor. Soc. Fish. Technol., 38, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2002.38.2.091
  6. Kitahara, T., 1968. On sweeping trammel net (Kogisasiami) fishery along coast of the San in district III. Mesh selectivity curve of sweeping trammel net for Branquillos. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., 34, 759-763. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.34.759
  7. Losanes, L.P., K. Matuda and Y. Fujimori, 1992. Estimating the entangling effect of trammel and semi-trammel net selectivity on rainbow trout. Fish. Res., 15, 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(92)90017-N
  8. Millar, R.B., 1992. Estimating the size-selectivity of fishing gear by conditioning on the total catch. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 962-968. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290632
  9. Millar, R.B. and R.J. Fryer, 1999. Estimating the sizeselection curves of towed gears, traps, nets and hooks. Rev. Fish Bio. Fish. 9, 89-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008838220001
  10. NFRDI (National Fisheries Research & Development Institute), 2007. The report for examination of regulation of catch prohibition by fisheries resources. Busan, Korea, 1-327.
  11. Park, C.D., H.C. An, S.K. Cho and C.I. Baik, 2003. Size selectivity of gill net for male snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio. Bull. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 39, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2003.39.2.143
  12. Park, C.D., E.C. Jeong, J.K. Shin, H.C. An and Y. Fujimori, 2004. Mesh selectivity of encircling gill net for gizzard shad Konosirus punctatus in the coastal sea of Korea. Fish. Sci., 70, 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2004.00840.x
  13. Park, H.H., R.B. Millar, H.C. An and H.Y. Kim, 2007. Size selectivity of drum-net traps for whelk (Buccinum opisoplectum dall) in the Korean coastal waters of the East Sea. Fish. Res., 86, 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.05.008
  14. Santos, M.N., M. Gaspar, C.C. Monteiro and K. Erzini, 2003. Gill net selectivity for European hake Merluccius merluccius from southern Portugal: implications for fishery management. Fisheries Science, 69, 873-882. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00702.x
  15. Wileman, D.A., R.S.T. Ferro, R. Fonteyne and R.B. Millar, 1996. Manual of methods of measuring the selectivity of towed fishing gears. ICES Cooperative Research Report, No. 215, pp. 126.