Factors Affecting the Adverse Drug Reactions of Mycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate Mofetil 부작용 발생에 미치는 요인 분석

  • Kim, Keum-Hi (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Yeun (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kyung-Ho (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Son, In-Ja (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hye-Suk (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2010.05.22
  • Accepted : 2010.09.09
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring of Mycophenolate mofetil(MMF) has been suggested in some clinical trials, but has not been widely adopted in Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze the withdrawal rates of MMF and determine the characteristics of the patients who experienced adverse reactions with MMF therapy and to suggest the criteria for selecting patients who need monitoring of MMF levels. We retrospectively collected data of patients who started MMF between July 2007 and June 2008. A total of 154 adult patients were included in our study. Among them, ninety seven patients discontinued MMF with 59 cases being due to adverse drug reactions. Thirty one patients required dosage reduction of MMF with twenty three cases being due to adverse reactions. Twenty six patients continued the MMF without or with mild adverse reactions. Of the 82 adverse reaction cases, hematologic adverse reactions accounted for 38 cases (46%) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse reactions accounted for 28 cases (34%). Older age and lower serum albumin levels were significantly different characteristics between the patients who withdraw MMF due to hematological adverse reactions and those who were able to continue therapy. The group who experienced GI adverse reactions had higher MMF dosages based on body weight and lower serum albumin levels. In conclusion, the factors affecting the adverse reactions of MMF were age, serum albumin level and higher dosage, therefore therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF should be considered in these patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho E, Han D, Kim S, et al., Pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolic acid in Korean kidney transplant patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 44: 743-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270004266634
  2. Knight SR, Morris PJ. Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review. Transplantation. 2008; 85: 1675-1685. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181744199
  3. Le Meur Y, Buchler M, Thierry A et al., Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007; 7: 2496-2503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01983.x
  4. Van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, et al., Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008 Oct 27; 86(8): 1043-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a
  5. Gaston RS, Kaplan B, Shah T, et al., Fixed- or controlleddose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduceddose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial. Am J Transplant. 2009 Jul; 9(7): 1607-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02668.x
  6. Kuypers DR, de Jonge H, Naesens M, et al., Current target ranges of mycophenolic acid exposure and drugrelated adverse events: A 5-year, open-label, prospective, clinical follow-up study in renal allograft recipients. Clin Ther. 2008 Apr; 30(4): 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.04.014
  7. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. Lancet. 1995;345: 1321-1325.
  8. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1996;61:1029-1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199604150-00008
  9. The US Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Sollinger HW. : Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1995;60:225-232. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003
  10. Hale MD, Nicholls AJ, Bullingham RE, et al., The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 64: 672-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90058-3
  11. Mourad M, Malaise J, Chaib Eddour D, et al., Correlation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters withside effects in kidney transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 188-94.
  12. Shaw LM, Figurski M, Milone MC, et al., Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep; 2(5): 1062-1072. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03861106
  13. Behrend M. Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and manage ment. Drug Saf. 2001; 24(9): 645-663. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200124090-00002
  14. Toda T, Motoki T, Kurosawa N, et al., The Relationship between dose of mycophenolate mofetil and the occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection and diarrhea in renal transplant recipients. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2005 Feb;125(2): 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.125.177