DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Auditory Warning Types on Response Time and Accuracy in Ship Bridges

선교내에서 청각경보음의 유형이 반응속도와 정확성에 미치는 영향

  • Ha, Wook-Hyun (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hannam University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ha (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hannam University) ;
  • Kim, Hong-Tae (Maritime & Ocean Engineering Research Institute, KORDI)
  • 하욱현 (한남대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 박성하 (한남대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김홍태 (한국해양연구원 해양시스템안전연구소)
  • Received : 2010.06.01
  • Accepted : 2010.07.19
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

The effects of different auditory warnings on response time and accuracy were studied in a laboratory ship-bridge work environment. Subjective preference on the type of auditory warnings was also of a primary concern. Twenty five subjects were asked to select an appropriate button for the warning sound presented with three types of auditory warning (abstract sound, auditory icon, and voice alarm) and five levels of warning situation (fire, steering failure, collision, engine failure, and low power). Results showed that the response time and accuracy was significantly affected by the types of auditory warning. The voice alarm resulted in a higher accuracy and subjective preference, as compared to the auditory icon and abstract sound. Regarding the response time, auditory icons and voice alarms were equivalent and superior to abstract sounds. Actual or potential applications of this research include guidelines for the design of integrated ship bridge systems.

Keywords

References

  1. 이봉왕, 김홍태, 양찬수, 양영훈, 통합선교 알람 시스템을 위한 알람 인지에 대한 기초 실험, 해양환경안전학회지, 11(1), 11-16, 2005.
  2. Ahlstrom, V., Auditory Alarms in the Airway Facilities Environment, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, OTE Technical note, 1-35, 2003.
  3. Ballas, J. A. and Howard, Jr., J. H., Interpreting the language of environmental sounds, Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 91-114, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916587191005
  4. Gaver, W. W., Auditory icons: Using sound in Computer Interfaces Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 167-177, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0202_3
  5. Lawrence, D. M. and Banks, W. P., Accuracy of recognition memory for common sound, Bull. Psycgon. Soc, 1, 298-300, 1973. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334350
  6. Leung, Y. K., Smith, S., Parker, S. and Martin, R., Learning and Retention of Auditory Warnings, International Conference on Auditory Display, 1997.
  7. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, E. J., Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 6th Ed., McGraw-Hill, 157-170, 1987.
  8. Simpson, C., Speech Controls and Displays", In G. Salvendy(Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, New York: Wiley, 1987.