Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제40권2호
  • /
  • Pages.69-75
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of non-submerged sand blasted with large grit and acid etched implants: a 5-year radiographic evaluation

  • Jung, Jee-Hee (Department of Periodontology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2010.02.10
  • 심사 : 2010.03.24
  • 발행 : 2010.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Implant survival rates using a bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE) procedure with simultaneous placement of a non-submerged sand blasted with large grit and acid etched (SLA) implant are well documented at sites where native bone height is less than 5 mm. This study evaluated the clinical results of non-submerged SLA Straumann implants placed at the time of the BAOSFE procedure at sites where native bone height was less than 4 mm. Changes in graft height after the BAOSFE procedure were also assessed using radiographs for 5 years after the implant procedure. Methods: The BAOSFE procedure was performed on 4 patients with atrophic posterior maxillas with simultaneous placement of 7 non-submerged SLA implants. At least 7 standardized radiographs were obtained from each patient as follows: before surgery, immediately after implant placement, 6 months after surgery, every year for the next 3 years, and after more than 5 years had passed. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at every visit. Radiographic changes in graft height were calculated with respect to the implant's known length and the original sinus height. Results : All implants were stable functionally, as well as clinically and radiographically, during the follow-up. Most of the radiographic reduction in the grafted bone height occurred in the first 2 years; reduction after 2 years was slight. Conclusions: The simultaneous placement of non-submerged SLA implants using the BAOSFE procedure is a feasible treatment option for patients with severe atrophic posterior maxillas. However, the grafted bone height is reduced during the healing period, and patients must be selected with care.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jensen J, Simonsen EK, Sindet-Pedersen S. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with bone grafting and osseointegrated implants: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90175-2
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Branemark PI, Lindstrom J, Jacobsson M. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:233-46.
  3. Isaksson S. Evaluation of three bone grafting techniques for severely resorbed maxillae in conjunction with immediate endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:679-88.
  4. Kahnberg KE, Nystrom E, Bartholdsson L. Combined use of bone grafts and Branemark fixtures in the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:297-304.
  5. Fugazzotto PA. Maxillary sinus grafting with and without simultaneous implant placement: technical considerations and case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:544-51.
  6. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:52-8.
  7. Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S. Two-stage maxillary sinus reconstruction with endosseous implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:758-66.
  8. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152-8.
  9. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3--Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium 1994;15:698-704.
  10. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  11. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, et al. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-8.
  12. Bruschi GB, Scipioni A, Calesini G, Bruschi E. Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:219-26.
  13. Winter AA, Pollack AS, Odrich RB. Placement of implants in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla using localized management of the sinus floor: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:687-95.
  14. Horowitz RA. The use of osteotomes for sinus augmentation at the time of implant placement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:441-52.
  15. Komarnyckyj OG, London RM. Osteotome single-stage dental implant placement with and without sinus elevation: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:799-804.
  16. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:175-82.
  17. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:194-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01192.x
  18. Diserens V, Mericske E, Schappi P, Mericske-Stern R. Transcrestal sinus floor elevation: report of a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:151-9.
  19. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-2
  20. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, Ryu KH, Sukotjo C, Yang JM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000;79:1857-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790110701
  21. Pinholt EM. Branemark and ITI dental implants in the human bone-grafted maxilla: a comparative evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:584-92. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140508.x
  22. Cavicchia F, Bravi F, Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:475-85.
  23. Fugazzotto PA. Augmentation of the posterior maxilla: a proposed hierarchy of treatment selection. J Periodontol 2003;74:1682-91. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.11.1682
  24. Peleg M, Mazor Z, Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:549-56.
  25. Buchmann R, Khoury F, Faust C, Lange DE. Peri-implant conditions in periodontally compromised patients following maxillary sinus augmentation: a long-term post-therapy trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100204.x
  26. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:279-86. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x
  27. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:277-84. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30576
  28. Geurs NC, Wang IC, Shulman LB, Jeffcoat MK. Retrospective radiographic analysis of sinus graft and implant placement procedures from the Academy of Osseointegration Consensus Conference on Sinus Grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:517-23.
  29. Bragger U, Gerber C, Joss A, Haenni S, Meier A, Hashorva E, et al. Patterns of tissue remodeling after placement of ITI dental implants using an osteotome technique: a longitudinal radiographic case cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:158-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00988.x
  30. Diserens V, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Radiographic analysis of the transcrestal sinus floor elevation: short-term observations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:70-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00049.x
  31. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Two‐Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft and Simultaneous Implant Placement vol.18, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12373
  2. Radiological Changes Associated with New Bone Formation Following Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation (OSFE): A Retrospective Study of 40 Patients with 18-Month Follow-Up vol.24, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.910739
  3. Radiographic outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: One‐year results of a bi‐center, parallel‐arm randomized trial vol.30, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13497
  4. The impact of graft remodeling on peri‐implant bone support at implants placed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter, retrospective case series vol.31, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13541
  5. The comparative evaluation of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation in sites with residual bone height ≤6 mm: A two‐year prospective randomized study vol.32, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13688
  6. Long‐term effects of sinus membrane perforation on dental implants placed with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A case-control study vol.23, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13038