Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

Knowledge-driven Dynamic Capability and Organizational Alignment: A Revelatory Historical Case

  • Kim, Gyeung-Min (College of Business Administration, Ewha Womans University)
  • Published : 2010.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The current business environment has been characterized as less munificent, highly uncertain and constantly evolving. In this environment, the company with dynamic capability is reported to be more successful than others in building competitive advantage. Dynamic capability focuses on the link between a dynamically changing environment, strategic agility, architectural reconfiguration, and value creation. Being characterized to be flexible and adaptive to market circumstance changes, an organization with dynamic capability is described to have high resource fluidity, which represents business process, resource allocation, human resource management and incentives that make business transformation faster and easier. Successful redeployment of the resources for dynamic adaptation requires organizational forms and reward systems to be well aligned with firm's technological infrastructures and business process. The alignment is considered to be an executive level commitment. Building dynamic capability is knowledge driven; relying on new knowledge to reconfigure firm's resources. Past studies established the link between the effective execution of a knowledge-focused strategy and relevant setting of architectural elements such as human resources, structure, process and information systems. They do not, however, describe in detail the underlying processes by which architectural elements are adjusted in coordinated manners to build knowledge-driven dynamic capability. In fact, understandings of these processes are one of the top issues in IT management. This study analyzed how a Korean corporation with a knowledge-focused strategy aligned its architectural elements to develop the dynamic capability and thus create value in the dynamically changing markets. When the Korean economy was in crisis, the company implemented a knowledge-focused strategy, restructured the organization's architecture by which human and knowledge resources are identified, structured, integrated and coordinated to identify and seize market opportunity. Specifically, the following architectural elements were reconfigured: human resource, decision rights, reward and evaluation systems, process, and IT infrastructure. As indicated by sales growth, the reconfiguration helped the company create value under an extremely turbulent environment. According to Ancona et al. (2001), depending on the types of lenses the organization uses, different types of architecture will emerge. For example, if an organization uses political lenses focusing on power, influence, and conflict. the architecture that leverage power and negotiate across multiple interest groups would emerge. Similarly, if an organization uses economic lenses focusing on the rational behavior of organizational actors making choices based on the costs and benefits of action, organizational architecture should be designed to motivate and provide incentives for the actors (Smith, 2001). Compared to this view, information processing perspectives consider architecture to be designed to maximize the capacity of information processing by the actors. Using knowledge lenses, the company studied in this research established architectural elements in a manner that allows the firm to effectively structure knowledge resources to form dynamic capability. This study is revelatory single case with a historic perspective. As a result of this study, a set of propositions and a framework are derived, which can be used for architectural alignment.

Keywords

References

  1. Ancona, D., Goodman, P., Lawrence, B. and Tushman, M., "Time: A New Research Lens," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.4, 2001, pp. 645-563.
  2. Baker, W., "Market networks and corporate behavior," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 96, pp. 589-625. https://doi.org/10.1086/229573
  3. Boland, R. and Tenkasi, R., "Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of Knowing," Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 30-372.
  4. Bourdieu, P., "The Forms of Capital," In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 1986, New York: Greenwood.
  5. Broadbent, M. and Weill, P., "Management by maxim: how business and IT managers can create IT infrastructures," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No.3, 1997, pp. 72-92.
  6. Brown S. and Eisenhardt, K., "Patching: Rest itching business portfolios in dynamic markets," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, No.3, pp. 72-82.
  7. Byrd, T. and Turner, D., "Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No.1, 2000, pp. 167- 208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045632
  8. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D., "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 No.1, 1990, pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  9. Conner, K and Prahalad, c., "A Resourcebased theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism," Organizational Science, Vol. 7, pp. 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.477
  10. Chandler, A, Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Churchill, B., "Jean Nouvel of France wins architecture's 'Novel'," Christian Science Monitor, Vol. 100, No. 89, 2008, pp. 14-14.
  12. Company Report-A, Management Innovation, 1998.
  13. Company Report-B, Knowledge Management, 1998.
  14. Company Report-C, Competency Based Structural Transformation, February, 1999.
  15. Davenport, T., Mission Critical: Realizing the Potential of Enterprise Systems, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA., 2000.
  16. Davenport, T. and Prusak, L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA., 2000.
  17. Doz, Y. and Kosonen, "The Dynamics of Strategic Agility: Nokia's Rollercoaster Experience," California Management Review, Vol. 50, No.3, 2008, pp. 95-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166447
  18. Eisenhardt, "Building Theories from Case Study Research," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No.4, 1989, pp. 532-555.
  19. Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J., "Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 1105- 1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  20. Eisenhardt, K, "Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No.3, 1991, pp. 620-627.
  21. El Sawy, O., Malhotra, A, Gosain, S., and Young, K., "IT-Intensive Value Innovation in the Electronic Economy: Insights from Marshall Industries," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No.3, 1999, pp. 305-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/249466
  22. Fredrickson, J., "The strategic decision process and organization structure," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No.2, 1986, pp. 280-99.
  23. Fukuyama, F., Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Hamish Hamilton, 1995.
  24. Galunic, C. and Eisenhardt, K., "Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1229-1249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069398
  25. Galunic, C. and Rodan, S., "Resource Recombination in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and Potential For Schumpeterian Innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, 1998, pp. 1193-1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1193::AID-SMJ5>3.0.CO;2-F
  26. Gavetti, G. and Levinthal, D., "Looking forward and look backward: Cognitive and Experiential search," Administrative Science, Vol. 45, pp. 113-137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666981
  27. Goffee, R. and Jones, G., "What holds the modern company together?," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 6, 1996, pp. 133- 148.
  28. Gold, A., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A., "Knowledge Management: An Organizational capability Perspective," Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 18, No.1, 2001, pp. 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  29. Grant, R., "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<109::AID-SMJ796>3.0.CO;2-P
  30. Hall., Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1991.
  31. Hankook Business Newspaper, "Major corporations adopt business unit system," Hankook Business Newspaper, 1998.
  32. Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R, "Technology Brokering and Innovation in Product Development Firm," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, 1997, pp. 716-749. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393655
  33. Helfat and Peteraf, "The Dynamic Resource- Based View: Capability Lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2003, pp. 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
  34. Hitt, M., Harrison, J., Ireland, R., and Best, A., "Attributes of Successful and Unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms," British Journal of Management, Vol. 9, 1998, pp. 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00077
  35. Hoogervorst, J., "Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility and Change," International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2004, pp. 213- 233. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021884300400095X
  36. Huang, C. and Hu, Q., "Achieving IT-Business Strategic Alignment via EnterpriseWide Implementation of Balanced Scorecards," Information Systems Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2007, pp. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530701239314
  37. Hung, R, Lien, B., and McLean, G., "Knowledge Management Initiatives, Organizational Process Alignment, Social Capital, and Dynamic Capabilities," Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 320-333.
  38. Hyun, M., Challenges, Not Ended Yet, Maeil Business Newspaper, 2006.
  39. Itbiz, "Become a leader through knowledge management," itbiz.co.kr, 1999.
  40. Kelloway, E. and Barling, J., "Knowledge Work as Organizational Behavior," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000, pp. 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00042
  41. Kerin, R., Mahajan, V., and Varadarajan, R., Contemporary perspectives on strategic marketing planning, Allyn and Bacon, 1990.
  42. Kieser, A., "Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses-An How This Should be Performed," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1994, pp. 608-620. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.608
  43. Kim. G., e-Business Strategy for Traditional Enterprise, Management Research Center, Ewha Womans University, 2002.
  44. Knuth, D., "Computer Programming as an Art," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 17, No. 12, 1974, pp. 667-673. https://doi.org/10.1145/361604.361612
  45. Kogut, B. and Zander, U., "What do firms do? Coordination, identity and learning, Organization Science, Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 502- 518. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502
  46. Upset,S., Trow, M., and Coleman, l., Union democracy, New York: Free Press, 1956.
  47. Luftman, J., Van Slyke, C., and Watson, R., "Information Systems Enrollments: Can They Be Increased?," Communications of AIS, Vol. 20, No. 20, 2007, pp. 649-659.
  48. MaeiI Business Newspaper, "Autonomy of business unit manager in using profits," Maeil Business Newspaper, 1999.
  49. Mason, R., McKenny, J., and Copeland, D., "Developing an Historical Tradition in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly, 1997, pp. 257-278.
  50. Mendelson, H., "Organizational architecture and Success in the Information Technology Industry," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2000, pp. 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.513.12060
  51. Miller, D. and Shamsie, J., "The resourcebased view of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 519-543.
  52. Nadler, D. and Gerstein, M., "What Is Organizational Architecture?," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No. 5, 1992, pp. 120- 121.
  53. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S., "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, And the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998, pp. 242-266.
  54. Nelson, R. and Winter, S., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA., 1982.
  55. Nelson, K. and Cooprider, J., "The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1996, pp. 409-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/249562
  56. Neustadt, R. and May, E., Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers, The Free Press, New York, 1986.
  57. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
  58. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N., "The Concept of 'ba': Building a Foundation of Knowledge Creation," California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1998, pp. 40-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942
  59. O'Brien, J., Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.
  60. O'Dell, C. and Grayson, C., "If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practice," California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1998, pp. 154-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165948
  61. Pepper, J. and Ward, J., "Mind the Gap: Diagnosing the relationship between the IT organization and the rest of the business," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1999, pp. 29-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(99)00013-X
  62. Pisano, G., "Knowledge integration and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, Winter Special Issue, pp. 85-100.
  63. Putnam, R., "The Prosperous Community: Social capital and Public life," American Prospect, Vol. 13, pp. 35-42.
  64. Preffer, J. and Sutton, R., The KnowingDoing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA., 2000.
  65. Rockart, J., "Information: Let's get it right," MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2004, pp. 143-150.
  66. Sah and Stiglitz, "The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies," The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1986, p. 716.
  67. Sanchez, R., "Strategic flexibility in product competition," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, Special Issue, 1995, pp. 135- 159. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160921
  68. Sauer, C. and Willcocks, L., "The Evolution of Organizational Architect," MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2002, pp. 41-49.
  69. Seo, D. and La Paz, A., "Exploring the Dark Side of IS in Achieving Organizational Agility," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 136-139.
  70. Siggelkow, N., "Evolution toward fit," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, pp. 125-159.
  71. Sirmon, D., Hitt, M., and Ireland, R, "Managing Firm Resources In Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007, pp. 273-292. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23466005
  72. Smith, C., "Organizational Architecture and Corporate Finance," The Journal of financial Research, Vol. XXIV, No.1, pp. 1-13, 2001.
  73. Spender, J., "Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106
  74. Stewart, T., "A New Way to Think about Employees," Fortune, Vol. 13, 1998, pp. 169- 170.
  75. Sull, D., "The dynamics of standing still: Firestone tire and rubber and the radical revolution," Business History Review, Vol. 73, Autumn Issue, 1999a, pp. 430-646. https://doi.org/10.2307/3116183
  76. Sull, D., "Why good companies go bad," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 1999b, pp. 42-52.
  77. Taylor, S. and Todd, P., "Understanding information technology usage: a test of computing models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, pp. 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  78. Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., "Dy_ namic Capabilities and Strategic Management," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1997, pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  79. Teece, D., "Firm Organization, Industrial Structure and Technological Innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 31, 1996, pp. 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5
  80. Tanriverdi, H., "Information Technology relatedness knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2005, pp. 311-334. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148681
  81. Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K., and Hitt, M., "Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: Resource-based and Organizational Learning Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 257-282, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00340
  82. Venkatesh, V., "Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model," Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  83. Wang and Ahmed, "Dynamic Capabilities: A review and Research Agenda," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9, No.1, 2007, pp. 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
  84. Wheeler, B., "NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities theory for Assessing Net-Enablement, " Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89
  85. Yin R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications Inc., New York, CA., 1994.
  86. Yin R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications Inc., New York, CA., 1994.
  87. Zahra, S. and George, G., "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension," The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2002, p. 185.
  88. Zahra, S., Sapienza, H., and Davidsson, P., "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2006, pp. 917-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
  89. Zollo, M. and Winter, S., "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities," Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780