A Case Study on R&D Process Innovation Using PI6sigma Methodology

PI6sigma를 이용한 R&D 프로세스 혁신 사례 연구

  • Kim, Young-Jin (Office of Electronics and Manufacturing Consulting, Samsung SDS) ;
  • Jeong, Woo-Cheol (Office of Electronics and Manufacturing Consulting, Samsung SDS) ;
  • Choi, Young-Keun (Dept. of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • 김영진 (삼성에스디에스(주) 전자/제조 컨설팅) ;
  • 정우철 (삼성에스디에스(주) 전자/제조 컨설팅) ;
  • 최영근 (건국대학교 사회과학대학 경영학과)
  • Received : 2009.07.13
  • Accepted : 2009.12.17
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

The corporate R&D(Research and Development) has a primary role of new product development and its potential is the most crucial factor to estimate corporate future value. However, its systemic inadequacies and inefficiencies, the shorten product life-cycle to satisfy customer needs, the global operations by outsourcing strategy, and the reduction of product cost, are starting to expose to R&D business processes. The three-phased execution strategy for R&D innovation is introduced to establish master plan for new R&D model. From information technology point of view, PLM(Product Life-cycle Management) is one of the business total solutions in product development area. It is not a system, but the strategic business approach that collaboratively manage the product from beginning stage to end of life in all business areas PLM functions and capabilities are usually used as references to re-design new R&D process. BPA(Business Process Assessment) and 5DP(Design Parameters) in PI6sigma developed by Samsung SDS Consulting division are introduced to establish R&D master plan and re-design process respectively. This research provides a case study for R&D process innovation. How process assessment and PMM(Process Maturity Model) can be applied in business processes, and also it explains process re-design by 5DP method.

Keywords

References

  1. 이상규;"제품 혁신의 선도 기업들은 무엇이 다른가",LG주간경제,16-20, 2004.
  2. Davenport, T. H.; "Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology," Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991
  3. Hammer, M. and Champy, J.; "Reengineering the Corporation : A manifesto for business revolution," HarperCollins publishers Inc., NY, 2003,
  4. George, V. and Michalis, G.; "Critical review of existing BPR methodologies," Business Process Management Journal, 5(1) : 65-86, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637159910249117
  5. Simon, A. K; "Consulting approachs to process improvement McKinsey and company," Viktoria Institute, 2003.
  6. Simon, A. K.; "Comparison of consulting approachs to process improvement," Viktoria Institute, 2003.