Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

  • 제47권5호
  • /
  • Pages.332-337
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2005-3711(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-7876(eISSN)
대한신경외과학회 (The Korean Neurosurgical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is Transradial Cerebral Angiography Feasible and Safe? A Single Center's Experience

  • Jo, Kwang-Wook (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Sung-Man (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Don (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Rim (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Baik, Min-Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Young-Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2010.02.22
  • 심사 : 2010.05.17
  • 발행 : 2010.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective : Although a transradial angiography is accepted as the gold standard for cardiovascular procedures, cerebral angiography has been performed via transfemoral approach in most institutions. The purpose of this study is to present our experience concerning the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a transradial approach to cerebral angiography as an alternative to a transfemoral approach. Methods : Between February 2007 and October 2009, a total of 1,240 cerebral angiographies were performed via a transradial approach in a single center. The right radial approach was used as an initial access route. The procedure continued only after the ulnar artery was proven to provide satisfactory collateral perfusion according to two tests (a modified Allen's test and forearm angiography). Results : The procedural success rate was 94.8% with a mean duration of 28 minutes. All supra-aortic vessels were successfully catheterized with a success rate of 100%. The success rates of selective catheterization to the right vertebral artery, right internal carotid artery, left internal carotid artery, and left vertebral artery were 96.1%, 98.6%, 82.6% and 52.2%, respectively. The procedure was performed more than twice in 73 patients (5.9%), including up to 4 times in 2 patients. The radial artery occlusion was found in 4 patients (5.4%) on follow-up cerebral angiography, but no ischemic symptoms were observed in any of the cases. Conclusion : This study suggests that cerebral angiography using a transradial approach can be performed with minimal risk of morbidity. In particular, this procedure might be useful for follow-up angiographies and place less stress on patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. : Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 : 349-356, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034
  2. Bendok BR, Przybylo JH, Parkinson R, Hu Y, Awad IA, Batjer HH : Neuroendovascular interventions for intracranial posterior circulation disease via the transradial approach : technical case report. Neurosurgery 56 : E626; discussion E626, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000154820.28342.38
  3. Benit E, Vranckx P, Jaspers L, Jackmaert R, Poelmans C, Coninx R : Frequency of a positive modified Allen's test in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 38 : 352-354, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199608)38:4<352::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-6
  4. Campeau L : Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 16 : 3-7, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810160103
  5. Esente P, Giambartolomei A, Simons AJ, Levy C, Caputo RP : Overcoming vascular anatomic challenges to cardiac catheterization by the radial artery approach : specific techniques to improve success. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 56 : 207-211, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10233
  6. Fessler RD, Wakhloo AK, Lanzino G, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN : Transradial approach for vertebral artery stenting : technical case report. Neurosurgery 46 : 1524-1527; discussion 1527-1528, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200006000-00044
  7. Hildick-Smith DJ, Lowe MD, Walsh JT, Ludman PF, Stephens NG, Schofield PM, et al. : Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations. Int J Cardiol 64 : 231-239, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(98)00074-6
  8. Iwasaki S, Yokoyama K, Takayama K, Ueda K, Sueyosi S, Nagasawa M, et al. : The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography. Acta Radiol 43 : 549-555, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430601.x
  9. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E : Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 129 : 1-7, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(95)90034-9
  10. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R : A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29 : 1269-1275, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8
  11. Kim JH, Park YS, Chung CG, Park KS, Chung DJ, Kim HJ : Feasibility and utility of transradial cerebral angiography : experience during the learning period. Korean J Radiol 7 : 7-13, 2006 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2006.7.1.7
  12. Lee DH, Ahn JH, Jeong SS, Eo KS, Park MS : Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography : a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety. Br J Radiol 77 : 831-838, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/89933527
  13. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, Bendok BR, Ringer AJ, Kim SH, et al. : Transradial cerebral angiography : an alternative route. Neurosurgery 51 : 335-340; discussion 340-342, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-200208000-00007
  14. Lotan C, Hasin Y, Mosseri M, Rozenman Y, Admon D, Nassar H, et al. : Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 76 : 164-167, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80050-2
  15. Louvard Y, Krol M, Pezzano M, Sheers L, Piechaud JF, Marien C, et al. : Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography : a single operator's experience. J Invasive Cardiol 11 : 543-548, 1999
  16. Ludman PF, Stephens NG, Harcombe A, Lowe MD, Shapiro LM, Schofield PM, et al. : Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 79 : 1239-1241, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00089-1
  17. Matsumoto Y, Hongo K, Toriyama T, Nagashima H, Kobayashi S : Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography : results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22 : 704-708, 2001
  18. Nohara AM, Kallmes DF : Transradial cerebral angiography : tech-nique and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24 : 1247-1250, 2003
  19. Park SH, Park JC, Hwang JH, Hwang SK, Hamm IS : Role of Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography in the followup of patients with aneurysm clips. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 39 : 427-431, 2006
  20. Ricci MA, Trevisani GT, Pilcher DB : Vascular complications of cardiac catheterization. Am J Surg 167 : 375-378, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(94)90119-8
  21. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S : Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46 : 173-178, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-4
  22. Saito S, Miyake S, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S, Kawamitsu K, Kaneda H, et al. : Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46 : 37-41, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199901)46:1<37::AID-CCD10>3.0.CO;2-Y
  23. Sakai H, Ikeda S, Harada T, Yonashiro S, Ozumi K, Ohe H, et al.: Limitations of successive transradial approach in the same arm: the Japanese experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 54: 204-208, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1268
  24. Valsecchi O, Vassieva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R, tespili M, Guagliumi G, et al. : Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67 : 870-878, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20732
  25. Wu CJ, Hung WC, Chen SM, Yang CH, Chen CJ, Cheng CI, et al.: Feasibility and safety of transradial artery approach for selective cerebral angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 66 : 21-26, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20396
  26. Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, Koyama Y, Hoshino S, Isshiki T, et al.: Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49: 357-362, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200004)49:4<357::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-Z

피인용 문헌

  1. Efficacy of Transradial Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly vol.53, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2013.53.4.213
  2. Ultrasound guided V3 segment vertebral artery direct percutaneous puncture for basilar artery mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: a technical report vol.6, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010601.rep
  3. Feasibility of the Transradial or the Transbrachial Approach in Various Neurointerventional Procedures vol.10, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.74
  4. Transradial approach to treating endovascular cerebral aneurysms: Case series and technical note vol.8, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_393_16
  5. Cerebral Angiography in lateral decubitus vol.8, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15406/jnsk.2018.08.00298
  6. Complications Following Transradial Cerebral Angiography : An Ultrasound Follow-Up Study vol.61, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0209
  7. Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013584
  8. Transradial approach for endovascular diagnosis and treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: A descriptive study vol.10, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.25259/sni-44-2019
  9. Distal radial approach for neurointerventional diagnosis and therapy vol.10, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_410_2019
  10. A prospective study of the transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral arteriography vol.11, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014686
  11. A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis vol.26, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602819859285
  12. Transradial approach for the treatment of brain aneurysms using flow diversion: feasibility, safety, and outcomes vol.63, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0390-5616.19.04761-1
  13. Alternative Transcarotid Approach for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Case Series vol.14, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2019.00094
  14. Radial Access for Neurointerventions vol.3, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15420/ver.2020.13
  15. Application of pigtail catheter tailing combined with long-wire swapping technique in cerebral angiography via the right radial artery vol.99, pp.39, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022309
  16. Comparison of Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography and Transradial Cerebral Angiography Following a Shift in Practice During Four Years at a Single Center in China vol.26, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.921631
  17. Left transradial access for cerebral angiography vol.12, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015386
  18. Femoral Artery Approach Using a Long Guiding Sheath in Intraoperative Angiography vol.48, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2335/scs.48.103
  19. Transarterial and transvenous access for neurointerventional surgery: report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee vol.12, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015573
  20. Transradial access for diagnostic angiography and interventional neuroradiology procedures: A four-year single-center experience vol.26, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019920925711
  21. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography vol.12, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10919
  22. Trans-Radial Approach: technical and clinical outcomes in neurovascular procedures vol.3, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-00152-z
  23. Transradial Approach for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility vol.42, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a6971
  24. Can Transradial Mechanical Thrombectomy Be an Alternative in Case of Impossible Transfemoral Approach for Mechanical Thrombectomy? A Single Center's Experience vol.64, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0240
  25. Animal Experiment of a Novel Neurointerventional Surgical Robotic System with Master-Slave Mode vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8836268
  26. Adoption of the Transradial Approach for Neurointerventions: A National Survey of Current Practitioners vol.30, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105589
  27. Predicting the degree of difficulty of the trans-radial approach in cerebral angiography vol.13, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016448
  28. Transradial Neuroendovascular Procedures in Adolescents: Initial Single-Center Experience vol.42, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a7142