DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physiological Response & Comfort according to Backpack Type and Weight for Girl Middle School Students

여중생 책가방의 형태와 무게에 따른 생리적 반응과 쾌적감

  • Park, Hae-Young (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, College of Human Ecology, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-A (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, College of Human Ecology, Inha University) ;
  • Na, Young-Joo (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, College of Human Ecology, Inha University)
  • 박혜영 (인하대학교 생활과학대학 의류학과) ;
  • 이경아 (인하대학교 생활과학대학 의류학과) ;
  • 나영주 (인하대학교 생활과학대학 의류학과)
  • Received : 2009.11.11
  • Accepted : 2010.03.30
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to weigh the students' backpacks of middle school in daily use and to analyse their physiological responses and subjective senses when carrying backpack in order to promote healthy and comfort school life of girl middle school students. Two female students were subjects who answered the questionnaires on two types of backpack and their metabolism, perspiration and the changes of skin temperature were measured in constant environment chamber, $25{\pm}1$ and $49{\pm}10$% RH. They walked on the treadmill carrying the backpack with the increment of backpack weight, 2 kg, 4 kg to 6 kg. When the backpack increases to 6 kg, the discomfort parameters and responses increases rapidly. Comparing with general type, improved type of backpack showed good results in physiological responses, but not in subjective senses, such as the ease of movement, pain, or total preference, specially in 2 kg and 4 kg. The girl students prefer the general type of backpack which is of fashion and small, when it weighs light such as 2 kg or 4 kg, while they prefer the improved bag which is functional when it is heavy as 6 kg. The longer wearing time of the medium weight, for example, 4 kg without feeling or recognition of any discomfort due to fashion style, might cause the students' posture and health weaker or more vulnerable to the problems.

Keywords

References

  1. 강선영. (2003). 여자중학생의 척추측만정도와 유연성의 상관관계. 한국유산소운동과학회지, 7(1), 109-115.
  2. 고경희. (2008). 학생용 통학 가방의 구매 기준 및 착용 만족에 관한 연구. 인하대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  3. 김창국, 신동민. (1995). 책가방의 휴대방식에 따른 보행 주기와 자세의 변화에 대한 운동학적 분석. 한국사회체육학회지, 3(1), 175-185.
  4. 김주상. (2000). 청소년에서 척추 측만의 교육에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  5. 박광희. (2007). 청소년들의 라이프스타일과 의복구매행동-대구지역을 중심으로-. 한국의류산업학회지, 9(6), 637-644.
  6. 윤남식. (1980). 초등학교 어린이의 가방무게와 운반 방법에 대한 Kinesiology 적 연구. 한국체육학회지, 19(1), 109-114.
  7. 이찬희, 정연택, 김한철, 류호상. (2006). 척추 측만증 학생과 정상 학생의 체격, 체력 및 정신건강 비교. 한국발육발달학회지, 14(2), 87-94.
  8. 조성초. (2001). 책가방 무게가 초등학생의 보행에 미치는 영향. 대한스포츠학회지, 19(2), 303-310.
  9. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. (2004). Kids and backpacks safety. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org
  10. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Backpacks safety, Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://www.aap.org
  11. American Chiropractic Association. (2005). School backpack use increases risk of childhood back pain. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://www.acatoday.org
  12. Luckstead, E. F., & Greydanus, D. E. (1993). Medical Care of the Adolescent Athlete. Los Angeles, Practice Management Information Corp: CA. pp. 137-138.
  13. Nigg, B. M. (1986). Biomechanics of Running Shoe Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 12-20.
  14. Pascoe, D. D., Pascoe, D. E., Wang, Y. T., Shim, D. M. and Kim, C. K. (1997). Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths. Ergonomics, 40(6), 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187928
  15. Scott, S. H., & Winter, D. A. (1990). Internal forces at chronic running injury sites. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22(3), 357-369.
  16. Suterland, D. H. (1984). Gait Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, p. 10.
  17. Whittifield, J., Legg, S. J. and Hedderley, D. I. (2005). Schoolbag weight and musculoskeletal symptoms in New Zealand secondary schools. Applied Ergonomics, 36(2), 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.10.004
  18. Devroey, C., Jonkers, I., Becker, A. D., Lenaerts, F., Spaepen. A. (2007). Evaluation of the effect of backpack load and position during standing and walking using biomechanical, physiological and subjective measures. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, K. U. - Leuven, Belgium, 6-11.

Cited by

  1. Gait Analysis According to the changes of the carrying type and weight of bag vol.14, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.1.199
  2. Correlations between Muscle Activities and Strap Length and Types of School Bag during Walking vol.26, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1937
  3. The Effects on Erector Spine Muscles and Calf Muscle Activity according to Book Bag Handling Styles and Footwear vol.9, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5627/KACE.2011.9.1.029