DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상완골 후경각이 가동역에 따른 견관절 근력에 미치는 영향

Effects of Shoulder Muscle Strength on Terminal Range by Humeral Head Retroversion

  • 박시영 (경희대학교 체육대학원 스포츠의.과학) ;
  • 이동준 (명지대학교 체육학부)
  • Park, Si-Young (Department of Sports Medicine and Science, Graduated school of Physical education, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Jun (Department of Physical education, Sport and Leisure Studies, Myongji University)
  • 투고 : 2010.01.13
  • 심사 : 2010.03.02
  • 발행 : 2010.04.30

초록

어깨 관절의 외선의 증대와 내선의 감소는 야구 투수들의 어깨에 주의 깊게 발생한다는 것을 알아야한다. 본 연구의 목적은 MRI 진단을 통해 상완골 후경각을 판단하고, 야구 투수들에게 정해진 각도에서의 길항근의 신장성 수축과 주동근의 단축성 수축을 통한 근력을 비교 분석하는데 있다. 대상자는 어깨관절의 통증을 경험하지 않은 9명의 투수들을 선정하였고, 투구측과 비투구측을 어깨관절을 대상으로 등속성 시스템을 이용하여, $90^{\circ}/s$$180^{\circ}/s$의 속도로 어깨관절의 내선 $90^{\circ}$와 외선 $20^{\circ}$의 범위에서 근력측정을 하였다. 모든 데이터는 대응 t검정을 사용해 분석 및 평가를 하였다(p<0.05). 그 결과 투구측의 총 가동역은 $180.1^{\circ}$로 나타났으며, 비투구측은 $183.7^{\circ}$로 나타났다. 상완골 후경각은 투구측이 $47.6{\pm}6.1^{\circ}$로 나타났으며, 비투구측은 $37.8{\pm}5.3^{\circ}$로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 투구측의 내선근 단축성 수축력(IR-Con)은 $31.5{\pm}5.1\;Nm$로 나타났으며, 비투구측의 $38.7{\pm}5.2\;Nm$와 비교해 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 투구측의 외선근 신장성 수축력(ER-Ecc)도 $20.3{\pm}4.7\;Nm$로 나타났으며, 비투구측의 $25.1{\pm}3.7\;Nm$에 비교해 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 결론으로는 본 연구의 검토를 통해 투수들의 어깨관절에 있어서 외선의 증대 및 내선의 감소는 상완골 후경각의 골성의 변화가 중요한 요인으로 나타났으며, 근력의 변화에도 중대한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Increased external rotation and decreased internal rotation have been noted to occur progressively in the throwing shoulders of baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to provide descriptive data for terminal range eccentric antagonist/concentric agonist shoulder muscle strength in collegiate baseball pitchers with humeral head retroversion diagnosed through MRI. The dominant and non-dominant shoulders of 9 asymptomatic baseball pitchers were tested through a range of 20 degrees of external rotation to 90 degrees of internal rotation using the Biodex system 3 isokinetic dynamometer at speeds of $90^{\circ}/s$ and $180^{\circ}/s$. Differences between the dominant and non-dominant shoulders were assessed using the paired samples t-test. Total range of motion, measured at $90^{\circ}$ of glenohumeral abduction, was $180.1^{\circ}$ for dominant shoulders and $183.7^{\circ}$ for non-dominant shoulders. Humeral head retroversion measured $47.6{\pm}6.1^{\circ}$ in dominant and $37.8{\pm}5.3^{\circ}$ in non-dominant extremities. The mean internal rotator concentric contraction (IR-Con) showed a significant difference compared to $31.5{\pm}5.1$ (Nm) in dominant and $38.7{\pm}5.2$ (Nm) in non-dominant shoulders at $180^{\circ}/s$ (p<0.05). The mean external rotator eccentric contraction (ER-Ecc) showed a significant difference compared to $20.3{\pm}4.7$ (Nm) in dominant and $25.1{\pm}3.7$ (Nm) in non-dominant shoulders at $90^{\circ}/s$ (p<0.05). There is a pattern of increased external rotation and decreased internal rotation in the dominant extremity that significantly correlates with an increase in humeral retroversion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aagaard, P., E. B. Simonsen, S. P. Magnusson, B. Larsson, and P. Dyhre-Poulsen. 1998. A new concept for isokinetic hamstring: quadriceps muscle strength ratio. Am. J. Sports Med. 2, 231-237.
  2. Bigliani, L. U., T. P. Codd, P. M. Connor, W. N. Levine, M. A. Littlefield, and S. J. Hershon. 1997. Shoulder motion and laxity in the professional baseball player. Am. J. Sports Med. 25, 609-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500504
  3. Burkhart, S. S., C. D. Morgan, and W. B. Kibler. 2003. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathlogy Part: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy 19, 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2003.50128
  4. Crockett, H. C., L. B. Gross, K. E. Wilk, M. L. Schwartz, J. Reed, J. Omara, M. T. Reilly, J. R. Dugas, K. Meister, S. Lyman, and J. R. Andrews. 2002. Osseous adaptation and range of motion at the glenohumeral joint in professional baseball pitchers. Am. J. Sports Med. 30, 20-26.
  5. Glousman, R., F. Jobe, J. Tibone, D. Moynes, D. Antonelli, and J. Perry. 1988. Dynamic electromyographic analysis of the throwing shoulder with glenohumeral instability. J. Bone Joint Surg. 70, 220-226.
  6. Jobe, F. W. and R. S. Kvitne. 1990. Shoulder and Elbow Injuries among Professional Baseball Players. Japanese J. Sports Sci. 9, 429-441.
  7. Kim, Y. K., H. S. Lee, and K. J. Han. 2009. Comparison of range of motion and isokinetic strength of baseball pitchers wity impingement or SLAP lesion. J. Kor. Sports Med. 27, 53-59.
  8. Krahl, V. 1947. The torsion of the humerus: Its localization, cause and duration in man. Am. J. Anat. 80, 275-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000800302
  9. Osbahr, D. C., D. L. Cannon, and Speer K. P. 2002. Retroversion of the humerus in the throwing shoulder of college baseball pitchers. Am. J. Sports Med. 30, 347-353.
  10. Pritchett, J. 1991. Growth plate activity in the upper extremity. Clin. Orthop. 268, 235-242.
  11. Reagan, K. M., K. Meister, and M. B. Horodyski. 2003. Humeral retroversion and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation in the shoulder of college baseball players. Am. J. Sports Med. 30, 354-360.
  12. Sarraafian, S. K. 1983. Gross and functional anatomy of the shoulder. Cli. Orthop. Rel. Res. 17, 11-12.
  13. Tomczak, R. J., K. P. Guenther, and A. Rieber. 1997. MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. Am. J. Roentgenol. 168, 791-794. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057536
  14. Tyler, T. F., T. Roy, and S. J. Nicholas. 2000. Quantification of posterior capsule tightness and motion loss in patients with shoulder impingement. Am. J. Sports Med. 28, 262-269.
  15. Yildiz, Y., T. Aydin, U. Sekir, M. Z. Kiralp, B. Hazneci, and T. A. Kalyon. 2006. Shoulder terminal range eccentric antagonist/concentric agonist strength ratios in overhead athlete. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 16, 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00471.x