Study on Prescription and Formation of SoAEuiBang and DongEuiBoGam

소아의방(小兒醫方)과 동의보감(東醫寶鑑)의 편제와 처방에 대한 연구

  • Kim, Cho-Young (Dept. of Oriental Pediatrics, East West Neo Medical Center, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Chang, Gyu-Tae (Dept. of Oriental Pediatrics, East West Neo Medical Center, Kyunghee University)
  • 김초영 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 한방소아과) ;
  • 장규태 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 한방소아과)
  • Received : 2010.03.26
  • Accepted : 2010.04.24
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

Objectives In the later period of Choseon dynasty, korean pediatrics became a pivot part of medicine. SoAUiBang was the most important book in that era. DongEuiBoGam was the most widely read of all oriental medicine books and published in early days of the Choseon dynasty. Therefore, this comparative study on the prescription and formation of SoAUiBang and DongEuiBoGam could be a useful way to understand SoAUiBang's characteristics. Methods This study was based on SoAUiBang and DongEuiBoGam, two literatures of oriental medicine. Results 1. Formation of SoAUiBang had a similar aspect with that of DongEuiBoGam's and enlarged the area of pediatrics by featuring general medical books. However, its formation did not follow the DongEuiBoGam's, but had its unique formation. It tried to include all diseases of pediatrics in the system of DongEuiBoGam. Plus, smallpox and measles belonged to the epidemic diseases were excluded from the area of pediatrics. 2. Comparing SoAUiBang's prescription of some important diseases with DongEuiBoGam's, it was almost a prescription based on DongEuiBoGam's prescription. However, adjustment of herbs and dosages could not be found in any oriental medicine books including DongEuiBoGam. Conclusions SoAUiBang maintained the traditional Oriental medicine based on author's scholarly creativeness. In addition, it also inherited the lineage of medicine in Korea along with the pedigree of DongEuiBoGam. Therefore, SoAUiBang should be re-evaluated as a medicine book that opened a new field of pediatric and had great academic values.

Keywords

References

  1. 이가은. 小兒醫方의 의사학적 연구: 판본과 문헌 고찰을 중심으로. 경희대학교 대학원. 2005:1-11.
  2. 김덕곤 외. 東醫小兒科學. 도서출판 정담. 2002:24-6.
  3. 한윤정, 장규태. 급유방에 기재된 의안에 대한 연구. 대한한방소아과학회지. 2007;21(1):1-2.
  4. 이가은. 崔奎憲의 小兒醫方연구. 경희대학교대학원. 2009:3-14.
  5. 정규만. 동의보감을 小兒科 領域에서 살펴 본 特徵과 끼친 影響. 龜巖學報. 醫聖許浚紀念事業會. 1992:45-7.
  6. 박윤성. 동의보감 내경편에 수록된 의안에 대한 연구. 동국대학교 대학원. 2004:5-6.
  7. 최혁용, 이진용, 김덕곤. 癲癎에 대한 한국 의사학적 고찰. 대한한방소아과학회지. 1997;11(1):12-17.
  8. 배병철. 표준 임상방제학. 성보사. 1995:11-23.
  9. 崔奎憲. 新譯註解 小兒醫方. 杏林書院. 1949.
  10. 崔奎憲 著, 李基榮․李命七 譯. 夢巖遺稿 小兒醫方. 杏林書院. 1949.
  11. 崔奎憲.新譯註解 小兒醫方, 杏林書院. 1949 .
  12. 許浚. 東醫寶鑑. 南山堂, 1983.
  13. 黃度淵. 方藥合編. 영림사. 2002.
  14. 김두종. 우리나라 痘瘡의 유행과 種痘法의 실시. 서울대학교 논문집 제4권. 1956.
  15. 신동원. 1910년대 일제의 보건의료 정책. 한국문화 제 30권. 2002
  16. 김남일. 한국 의학의 정체성에 대하여. 제7회 한국의사학 학술대회 자료집. 2006.