DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PNA-Mediated PCR Clamping for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

비소세포폐암에서 PNA-Mediated PCR Clamping을 이용한 EGFR 돌연변이 분석법

  • Lee, Kye-Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Joung (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Jong (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Gwang-Ha (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Won-Dong (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Seo-Young (Department of Pathology, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Wan-Seop (Department of Pathology, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
  • 이계영 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 김희정 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 김순종 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 유광하 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 김원동 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 오서영 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 병리학교실) ;
  • 김완섭 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 병리학교실)
  • Received : 2010.09.03
  • Accepted : 2010.10.15
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype is the most important predictive marker to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and first-line gefitinib treatment will be approved in the near future for use in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the EGFR mutation. Direct sequencing is known to be the standard for detecting EGFR mutations; however, it has limited sensitivity. Peptide nucleic acids (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method is a newly introduced method for analyzing EGFR mutations with increased sensitivity and stability. Methods: A total of 71 NSCLC patients were analyzed for EGFR mutations using the PNA-mediated PCR clamping technique. Sixty-nine patients were analyzed for clinicopathologic correlation with EGFR genotype; 2 patients with indeterminate results were excluded. In order to determine EGFR-TKI drug response, 57 patients (42 gefitinib, 15 erlotinib) were included in the analysis. Results: The EGFR mutation rate was 47.8%. Being female, a non-smoker, and having adenocarcinoma were favorable clinicopathologic factors, as expected. However, more than a few smokers (33.3%), male (28.1%), and patients with non-adenocarcinoma (28.6%) had the EGFR mutation. Having a combination of favorable clinicopathologic factors did not increase the EGFR mutation rate significantly. Drug response to EGFR-TKIs showed significant differences depending on the EGFR genotype; ORR was 14.3% for wild type vs 69.0% for mutant type; DCR is 28.6% for wild type vs 96.6% for mutant type. The median EGFR-TKI treatment duration is 7.6 months for mutant type group and 1.4 months for wild type group. Conclusion: EGFR genotype determined using the PNA-mediated PCR clamping method is significantly correlated with the clinical EGFR-TKI responses and PNA-mediated PCR.

Keywords

References

  1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129-39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040938
  2. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304: 1497-500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099314
  3. Pao W, Miller VA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and nonsmall- cell lung cancer: current knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2556-68. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.07.799
  4. Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, Bartolini S, Ceresoli GL, Bemis L, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-smallcell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:643-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji112
  5. Zhu CQ, da Cunha Santos G, Ding K, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Liu N, et al. Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4268-75. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8924
  6. Dacic S. EGFR assays in lung cancer. Adv Anat Pathol 2008;15:241-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0b013e31817bf5a9
  7. Pao W, Ladanyi M. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in lung cancer: searching for the ideal method. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4954-5. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1387
  8. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947-57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810699
  9. Lee KY. Molecular diagnosis in lung cancer. J Lung Cancer 2010;9:9-14. https://doi.org/10.6058/jlc.2010.9.1.9
  10. Tanaka T, Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Koyama N, Matsuoka S, Sutani A, et al. Reliability of the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp-based test for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations integrated into the clinical practice for non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Sci 2007;98:246-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00377.x
  11. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70364-X
  12. Hwang TS. Molecular biologic techniques in cytopathologic diagnosis. Korean J Pathol 2009;43:387-92. https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2009.43.5.387
  13. Kim SK, Kim DL, Han HS, Kim WS, Kim SJ, Moon WJ, et al. Pyrosequencing analysis for detection of a BRAFV600E mutation in an FNAB specimen of thyroid nodules. Diagn Mol Pathol 2008;17:118-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31815d059d
  14. Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res 2005;65:7276-82. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0331
  15. Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Nagai Y, Matsuoka M, Sutani A, Udagawa K, et al. Peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp-based detection test for gefitinib-refractory T790M epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Cancer Sci 2008;99: 595-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00706.x
  16. Tanaka T, Matsuoka M, Sutani A, Gemma A, Maemondo M, Inoue A, et al. Frequency of and variables associated with the EGFR mutation and its subtypes. Int J Cancer 2010;126:651-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24746
  17. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:169-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2088
  18. Chou TY, Chiu CH, Li LH, Hsiao CY, Tzen CY, Chang KT, et al. Mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor is a predictive and prognostic factor for gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11: 3750-7. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1981
  19. Cortes-Funes H, Gomez C, Rosell R, Valero P, Garcia- Giron C, Velasco A, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations in Spanish gefitinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2005;16: 1081-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi221
  20. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, Lindeman N, Holmes AJ, Joshi VA, et al. Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3908-14. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0462
  21. Balak MN, Gong Y, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Li AR, Zakowski MF, et al. Novel D761Y and common secondary T790M mutations in epidermal growth factor receptormutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:6494-501. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1570
  22. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Park JO, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 2007;316:1039-43. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141478
  23. Engelman JA, Jänne PA. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:2895-9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2248
  24. Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, et al. Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 2008;359:366-77. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0800668

Cited by

  1. EGFR 돌연변이 검출에 있어 PNA-Mediated Real-Time PCR Clamping과 직접 염기서열 분석법의 비교 분석 vol.70, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2011.70.1.21
  2. Clinical investigation of EGFR mutation detection by pyrosequencing in lung cancer patients vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.950
  3. Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patient with leptomeningeal metastasis of epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small cell lung cancer vol.33, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2016.33.1.64
  4. Prognostic value of quantitative measurement ofEGFRmutation using peptide nucleic acid clamping in advancedEGFRmutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients vol.10, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13101
  5. Clinical significance of EGFR mutation types in lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-centre Korean study vol.15, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228925