DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Different Particle Size from PAHs Contaminated Sediment by Ultrasonic Irradiation

PAHs로 오염된 침전물의 초음파 처리시 입자크기가 미치는 영향

  • Na, Seung-Min (Department of Civil and Environmental and Geodetic Science, Ohio State University) ;
  • Khim, Jee-Hyeong (Department of Civil Environmental and Architecture, Korea University) ;
  • Cui, Ming-Can (Department of Civil Environmental and Architecture, Korea University) ;
  • Ahn, Yun-Gyong (Korea Basic Science Institute) ;
  • Weavers, Linda K. (Department of Civil and Environmental and Geodetic Science, Ohio State University)
  • 나승민 ;
  • 김지형 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 최명찬 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 안윤경 (한국기초가학지원연구원, 서울센터 분석연구부) ;
  • Received : 2010.02.04
  • Accepted : 2010.03.23
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

Sediments of Little Scioto (LS) River in Ohio was contaminated by poor disposal of creosote from Baker Wood Creosoting Facility. Among the primary compounds of creosote, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) are the most common ingredient PAHs are known for toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic compounds. There are many difficulties to remove the PAHs in nature environment because their characteristics are having a less water-solubility, volatile and low mobility properties as increasing the molecular weight. The generation of hydroxyl radicals (${\cdot}OH$) and hydrogen peroxide ($H_2O_2$) forms as well as high temperature (5000 K) and pressure (1000 atm) by a physico-chemical effects of ultrasound during a cavitation collapse can promote the degradation and desorption of PAHs in sediment And it can also produces shock wave and microjets which are able to change the size and surface of particle in solid-liquid system as one of physical effects. Therefore, we explored to understand the role of particle size, the effect of elimination for PAHs concentration by ultrasound and optimize the conditions for ultrasonic treatment. The condition of various size of particles (> $150{\mu}m$, < $150{\mu}m$) and solid-liquid ratio (12.5g/L, 25g/L) for the treatment was considered and ultrasonic power (430 W/L) with liquid - hexane extraction and microwave extraction method were applied after ultrasound treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. 김승현, 임명희, 김지형, 2004, 초음파에 의한 염소계화합물의 분해특성 연구, 한국폐기물학회지, 21(2), 162-172.
  2. 권성형, 김종향, 조대철, 2006, 액상 PAHs의 자외선에너지와 초음파를 이용한 분해, 한국환경과학회지, 15(7), 669-676. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2006.15.7.669
  3. 임봉빈, 김선태, 2002, 초음파분해반응에 있어서 회가스의 영향, 한국환경과학회지, 11(7), 749-755.
  4. Ayyildiz, O., Peters, R. W., Anderson, P. R., 2007, Sonolytic degradation of halogenated organic compounds in groundwater, mass transfer effects, Ultra. Sonochem., 14, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.04.004
  5. Collings, A. F., Farmer, A. D., Gwan, P. B., Pintos, A. P., Leo, C. J., 2006, Processing contaminated soil and sediments by high power ultrasound, Minerals Eng., 19, 450-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.07.014
  6. Cornelissen, G., van Noort, P. C. M., Govers, H. A. J., 1997, Desorption kinetics of chlorobenzens, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and poly-chlorinated bisphenyls: sediment extraction with Tenax and effects of contact time and solute hy-drophobicity, Env. Toxi. and Chem., 16(7), 1351-1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160703
  7. Haapea, P., Tuhkanen, T., 2006, Integrated treatment of PAH contaminated soil by soil washing, ozo-nation and biological treatment, J of Hazard. Mater., B136, 244-250.
  8. He, Z., Traina, S. J., Weavers, L. K., 2007, Sonolytic desorption of mercury from aluminum oxide: ef-fects of pH, chloride and organic matter, ES&T, 41, 779-784. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0613052
  9. Hwang, S., Cutright, T. J., 2002, Biodegradability of aged pyrene and phenanthrene in a natural soil, Chemosphere, 47, 891-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00016-4
  10. Laughrey, Z., Bear, E., Jones, R., Tarr, M. A., 2001, Aqueous sonolytic decomposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of addi-tional dissolved species, Ultra. Sonochem., 8, 353-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(00)00080-8
  11. Little, C., Hepher, M. J., El-Sharif, M., 2002, The so-no-degradation of phenanthrene in an aqueous environment, Ultrasonics, 40, 667-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00196-8
  12. Lu, Y., Weavers, L. K., 2002, Sonochemical de-sorption and destruction of 4-chlorobiphenyl from synthetic sediments, ES&T, 36, 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010641+
  13. Lu, Y., Riyanto, N., Weavers, L. K., 2002, Sonolysis of synthetic sediment particles: particle characteristics affecting particle dissolution and size re-duction, Ultra. Sonochem., 9, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(02)00076-7
  14. Pino, V., Ayala, J. H., Afonso, A. M., Gonzalez, V., 2001, Ultrasonic micellar extraction of poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from marine sediments, Talanta, 54, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00622-6
  15. Prozorov, T., Prozorov, R., Suslick, K. S., 2004, High velocity intraparticle collisions driven by ultrap-sound, J of Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 13890-13891. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja049493o
  16. Suslick, K. S., 1989, The chemical effects of ultra-sound, Sci. Am. Feb., 80-86.
  17. US EPA, 2005, Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazarous waste sites, U.S. Environ-mental Protection Agency.
  18. US EPA, 1993b, Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms : Phenanathrene, EPA-822-R-93-014.
  19. US EPA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Methods 9060A, total organic carbon 3rd ed.
  20. Wang, J. Z., Guan, Y. F., Ni, H. G., Luo, X. L., Zeng, E. Y., 2007, Aromatic hydrocarbons in riverine runoff of the pearl river delta(china) concentration, fluxes and fate, ES&T, 41, 5614-5619. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070964r
  21. Weavers, L. K., 2001, Advances in Sonochemistry, Elsevier Science : Amsterdam, 6.
  22. WHO, 1984, Guidelines for drinking -water quality, 2: Health criteria and other surpporting in-formation, WHO Geneva.
  23. Wu, Z. L., Ondruschka, B., 2005, Role of hydro-phobicity and volatility of organic substrates on sonolytic kinetics in aqueous solutions, J.of Phy. Che. A., 109, 6521-6526. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp051768e