DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consensus on definition and quality standard of clinical practice guideline using RAND method

RAND 방법으로 합의한 임상진료지침의 정의와 질 평가 기준

  • Received : 2009.10.27
  • Accepted : 2010.06.01
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Background : Clinical practice guidelines are an increasingly familiar part of clinical practice. Moreover, rigorously developed evidence based guidelines has been widely used. However, in Korea, some of published documents as clinical practice guidelines have shown considerable disparity in structure, contents and quality. This is mainly because there is no consensus on the definition and quality standard of clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this study was to draw consensus on the definition and the quality standard about clinical practice guidelines. Method : We developed a questionnaire about the definition of clinical practice guidelines with inclusion criteria(23 items) and the quality standard(30 items). We selected 9 experts who had prior experience in developing and implementing guidelines. Rating methods for appropriateness of items were adopted from the RAND method. Consensus was drawn in three rounds. Results : Of the 47 items agreed, 40 items were determined to be appropriate. Clinical practice guidelines were defined as "scientifically and systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patients on making decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances." Narrative reviews, systematic reviews or health technology assessment without recommendations, translation of foreign guidelines, guidelines for patients only and training manuals were not considered as clinical practice guidelines. For the quality standard of clinical practice guidelines, 27 items were deemed necessary. Conclusions : The consensus on the definition with inclusion criteria and the quality standard of clinical practice guidelines carries an important meaning as the first attempt to draw a general agreement in our society. The unique achievement of the consensus reflects the current status of clinical practice guidelines that there has been a high tendency to adapt foreign guidelines. We hope efforts of this kind will continue to bring improvement in clinical practice guidelines.

Keywords

References

  1. 김남순. 외국현황과 국내사례 비교를 통한 임상진료지침 발전방안. 한국의료QA학회지 2003 ; 10(2) : 238-252.
  2. 김남순, 김수영, 박은자. 의료의 질 향상을 위한 기반 구축 방안 : 임상진료지침을 중심으로. 서울 : 한국보건사회연구원 ; 2004.
  3. 김남순. 임상진료지침 개발현황 및 정책과제. 보건복지포럼 2004 ; 10 : 5-19.
  4. 안형식, 경민호. 국내 임상진료지침의 개발 및 보급 동향. 한국의료QA학회지 2007 : 13(2) : 19-28.
  5. 이선희. 국내 임상진료지침의 개발 및 활용을 위한 정책방향. 한국의료QA학회지 2007 : 13(2) : 9-17.
  6. 임상진료지침정보센터(진료지침 개발현황) available from : http://www.guideline.or.kr/contents/ index.php?code=015
  7. Cluzeau FA, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw JM, Feder G, Moran SE. Development and application of generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999 ; 11(1) : 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/11.1.21
  8. De Luc K, Whittle C. An integrated care pathway appraisal tool; a 'badge of quality'. Journal of Integrated Care pathways 2002 ; 6 : 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147322970200600104
  9. Korean guideline clearinghouse(진료지침 목록) available from : http://ncrc.cdc.go.kr/guideline/browse/browse_st04_list.jsp
  10. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines : Directions for an New Program. Washington, DC : National Academy Press ; 1990.
  11. Institute of Medicine. Knowing what works in health care : A roadmap for thenation. Washington, DC : The National Academies Press ; 2008.
  12. Fitch L, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaroet P et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Arlington : RAND ; 2001.
  13. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by subspecialty societies: The need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000 ; 355 : 103–106.
  14. Leape L, Park R, Kahan J, Brrok R. Group judgement of appropriateness : the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care 1992 ; 4 : 151-159.
  15. NICE Guidance. available from : URL : http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp
  16. NGC definition of clinical practice guidelines and inclusion criteria. available from : URL : http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx
  17. The AGREE Collaboration. "Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines : the AGREE project". Qual Saf Health Care 2003 ; 12 : 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.1.18
  18. Sheneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith FM, Rothwangl J. Are Guidelines Following Guidelines? The Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Peer-Reviewed Medical Literature. JAMA 1999 ; 281(20) : 1900-1905. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.20.1900
  19. Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines : multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care 2005 ; 17(3) : 235-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi027
  20. Wall DK, Proyect MM. Santa Monica : Bonus Books, Inc.; 1997, 1998. 이상일, 강영호(옮김). 주임상경로의 개발과 적용. 서울 : 위드 ; 2000. 쪽 2-3.
  21. WHO. Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. available from : URL : http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/ EIP_GPE_EQC_2003_1.pdf
  22. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999 ; 318 : 527-530 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527