Interdisciplinary Bio Central

Korean Society for Bioinformatics (한국생명정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fragment Molecular Orbital Method: Application to Protein-Ligand Binding

  • Received : 2010.05.31
  • Accepted : 2010.06.07
  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method provides a novel tool for ab initio calculations of large biomolecules. This method overcomes the size limitation difficulties in conventional molecular orbital methods and has several advantages compared to classical force field approaches. While there are many features in this method, we here focus on explaining the issues related to protein-ligand binding: FMO method provides useful interaction-analysis tools such as IFIE, CAFI and FILM. FMO calculations can provide not only binding energies, which are well correlated with experimental binding affinity, but also QSAR descriptors. In addition, FMO-derived charges improve the descriptions of electrostatic properties and the correlations between docking scores and experimental binding affinities. These calculations can be performed by the ABINIT-MPX program and the calculation results can be visualized by its proper BioStation Viewer. The acceleration of FMO calculations on various computer facilities is ongoing, and we are also developing methods to deal with cytochrome P450, which belongs to the family of drug metabolic enzymes.

Keywords

References

  1. Amari, S. Aizawa, M., Zhang, J., Fukuzawa, K., Mochizuki, Y.,Iwasawa, Y., Nakata, K., Chuman, H. and Nakano T., VISCANA:Visualized Cluster Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interaction Basedonthe ab Initio Fragment Molecular Orbital Method for VirtualLigand Screening, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 46 (2006) 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci050262q
  2. Fedorov, D. G, Kitaura, K., Li, H., Jensen, J. H. and Gordon, M. S.(2006) The polarizable continuum model (PCM) interfaced withthe fragment molecular orbital method (FMO), J. Comp. Chem.27 976-985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20406
  3. Fischer, B., Fukuzawa, K. and Wenzel, W. (2008) Receptor-specificscoring functions derived from quantum chemical modelsimprove affinity estimates for in-silico drug discovery, Proteins:Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 70 1264-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21607
  4. Fukuzawa, K., Kitaura, K., Uebayasi, M., Nakata, N., Kaminuma T.and Nakano, T. (2005) Ab initio quantum mechanical study ofthe binding energies of human estrogen receptor with its ligands:An application of fragment molecular orbital method, J. Comput.Chem. 26 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20130
  5. Fukuzawa, K., Mochizuki, Y., Tanaka, S., Kitaura, K., Nakano, T.(2006) Molecular Interactions between Estrogen Receptor andIts Ligand Studied by the ab Initio Fragment Molecular OrbitalMethod, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 16102-16110. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060770i
  6. Fujitani, H., Tanida, Y., Matsuura, A. (2009) Massively parallelcomputation of absolute binding free energy with well-equilibratedstates, Phys. Rev. E 79 021914. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.021914
  7. Harada, T., Yamagishi, K., Nakano, N., Kitaura, K. and Tokiwa, H.(2008) Ab initio fragment molecular orbital study of ligandbinding to human progesterone receptor ligand-binding domain,Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmac. 377 607-615.
  8. Ishikawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T., Amari, S., Mori, H., Honda,H., Fujita, T., Tokiwa, H., Tanaka, S., Komeiji, Y., Fukuzawa, K.,Tanaka, K. and Miyoshi, E. (2006) Fragment molecular orbitalcalculations on large scale systems containing heavy metal atom,Chem. Phys. Lett. 427 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.06.103
  9. Ishikawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Amari, S., Nakano, T., Tokiwa, H.,Tanaka, S. and Tanaka, K. (2007) Fragment interaction analysisbased on local MP2, Theor. Chem. Acc. 118 937-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0374-7
  10. Ishikawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Amari, S., Nakano, T., Tanaka, S. andTanaka, K. (2008) An application of fragment interaction analysisbased on local MP2, Chem. Phys. Lett. 463 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.08.022
  11. Ito, M., Fukuzawa, K., Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T. and Tanaka, S.(2007) Ab Initio Fragment Molecular Orbital Study of MolecularInteractions between Liganded Retinoid X Receptor and ItsCoactivator: Roles of Helix 12 in the Coactivator BindingMechanism, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 3525-3533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp070054w
  12. Ito, M., Fukuzawa, K., Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T., Tanaka, S. (2008a) Ab Initio Fragment Molecular Orbital Study of MolecularInteractions between Liganded Retinoid X Receptor and ItsCoactivator; Part II: Influence of Mutations in TranscriptionalActivation Function 2 Activating Domain Core on the MolecularInteractions, , J. Phys. Chem. A 112 1986-1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp075430r
  13. Ito, M., Fukuzawa, K., Ishikawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T.,Tanaka S. (2008 b) Ab Initio Fragment Molecular Orbital Studyof Molecular Interactions in Liganded Retinoid X Receptor:Specification of Residues Associated with Ligand InducibleInformation Transmission, , J. Phys. Chem. B. 112 (2008)12081-12094. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp803369x
  14. Kurisaki, I., Fukuzawa, K., Komeiji, Y., Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T.,Imada, J., Chmielewski, A., Rothstein, S. M., Watanabe, H.,Tanaka S. (2007) Visualization analysis of inter-fragmentinteraction energies of CRP-cAMP-DNA complex based on thefragment molecular orbital method, Biophys. Chem. 130 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2007.06.011
  15. Li, H., Fedorov, D.G., Nagata, T., Kitaura, K., Jensen, J. H., GordonM. S. (2010) Energy gradients in combined fragment molecularorbital and polarizable continuum model (FMO/PCM) calculation.J. Comp. Chem. 31 778-790.
  16. Mochizuki, M., Koikegami, S., Nakano, T., Amari S. and Kitaura K.(2004a) Large scale MP2 calculations with fragment molecularorbital scheme, Chem. Phys. Lett. 396, 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.082
  17. Mochizuki, Y., Nakano, T., Koikegami, S., Tanimori, S., Abe, Y.,Nagashima U. and Kitaura K. (2004b) A parallelized integraldirectsecond-order Moeller-Plesset perturbation theory methodwith a fragment molecular orbital scheme, Theor. Chem. Acc.112 442-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-004-0602-3
  18. Mochizuki, Y., Fukuzawa, K., Kato, A., Tanaka, S., Kitaura, K. andNakano, T. (2005) A configuration analysis for fragmentinteraction, , Chem. Phys. Lett. 410 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.05.079
  19. Mochizuki, Y., Yamashita, K., Murase, T., Nakano, T., Fukuzawa, K.,Takematsu, K., Watanabe, H. and Tanaka S. (2008) Large scaleFMO-MP2 calculations on a massively parallel-vector computer,Chem. Phys. Lett. 457 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.03.090
  20. Nakano, T., Kaminuma, T., Sato, T., Akiyama, Y., Uebayasi, M. andKitaura, K. (2000) Fragment molecular orbital method:application to polypeptides. Chem. Phys. Lett. 318 614-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00070-1
  21. Nakano, T., Kaminuma, T., Sato, T., Fukuzawa, K., Akiyama, Y.,Uebayasi and M., Kitaura, K. (2002) Fragment molecular orbitalmethod: use of approximate electrostatic potential, Chem. Phys.Lett. 351 475-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01416-6
  22. Okiyama, Y., Watanabe, H., Fukuzawa, K., Nakano, T., Mochizuki,Y., Ishikawa, T., Tanaka, S., Ebina K. (2007) Application of thefragment molecular orbital method for determination of atomiccharges on polypeptides, Chem. Phys. Lett. 449 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.10.066
  23. Okiyama, Y., Watanabe, H., Fukuzawa, K., Nakano, T., Mochizuki,Y., Ishikawa, T., Ebina, K., Tanaka, S. (2009) Application of thefragment molecular orbital method for determination of atomiccharges on polypeptides. II. Towards an improvement of forcefields used for classical molecular dynamics simulations, Chem.Phys. Lett. 467 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.11.044
  24. Okiyama, Y., Nakano, T., Yamashita, K., Mochizuki, Y., Taguchi, N.,Tanaka S. (2010) Acceleration of fragment molecular orbitalcalculations with Cholesky decomposition approach, Chem.Phys. Lett. 490 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.03.001
  25. Rezac, J., Jurecka, P., Riley, K. E., Cerny, J., Valdes, H.,Pluhackova, K., Berka, K.; Rezac, T.; Pitonak, M.; Vondrasek, J.;Hobza, P. (2008) Quantum Chemical Benchmark Energy andGeometry Database for Molecular Clusters and ComplexMolecular Systems (www.begdb.com): A Users Manual andExamples, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 73, 1261-1270. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20081261
  26. Szabo, A. and Ostlund, N. S. (1982) Modern Quantum Chemistry:Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  27. Yamagishi, K., Yamamoto, K. Yamada S., and H. Tokiwa (2006)Functions of key residues in the ligand-binding pocket of vitaminD receptor: Fragment molecular orbital-interfragment interactionenergy analysis, Chem. Phys. Lett. 420 (2006) 465-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.12.078
  28. Yoda, T., Sugita, Y., Okamoto, Y. (2004) Comparisons of forcefields for proteins by generalized-ensemble simulations, Chem.Phys. Lett. 386 460-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.078
  29. Yoshida, T., Yamagishi, K., Chuman, H. (2008) QSAR Study ofCyclic Urea Type HIV-1 PR Inhibitors Using Ab Initio MOCalculation of Their Complex Structures with HIV-1, QSARComb. Sci. 27 694-703. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200730108
  30. Yoshida, T., Fujita, T., Chuman, H., (2009) Novel QuantitativeStructure-Activity Studies of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors of theCyclic Urea Type Using Descriptors Derived from MolecularDynamics and Molecular Orbital Calculations, Curr. Comp.-Aided Drug Des. 5 38-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340909787580845
  31. Watanabe, H., Tanaka, S., Okimoto, N., Hasegawa, A., Taiji. M.,Tanida Y., Mitsui T., Katsuyama M., Fujitani, H., (2010)Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands withstate-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MMPB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches, Chem-Bio InformaticsJournal 10 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1273/cbij.10.32

Cited by

  1. Use of QM/MM scheme to reproduce macromolecule–small molecule noncovalent binding energy vol.991, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2012.04.010
  2. Fragment library design considerations vol.2, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1098