DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Media Type and Various Operating Parameters on Nitrification in Polishing Biological Aerated Filters

  • Ha, Jeong-Hyub (Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ong, Say-Kee (Iowa State University, Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Surampalli, R. (US EPA)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.21
  • 심사 : 2010.04.26
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

Three biological aerated filters (BAFs) composed of a PVC pipe with a diameter of 75 mm were constructed and operated at a waste-water temperature at $13^{\circ}C$. The media used for each BAF were: 5-mm gravel; 5-mm lava rock; 12.5-mm diameter by 15-mm long plastic rings, all with a media depth of 1.7 m. The feedwater, which simulated the effluent of aerated lagoons, had influent soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) and ammonia concentrations of approximately 50 and 25 mg/L, respectively. For a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of two hours without recirculation, ammonia percent removals were 98.5, 98.9, and 97.8%, for the gravel, lava rock, and plastic rings, respectively. By increasing the effluent recirculation from 100 to 200% for an HRT of one hour, respective ammonia removals improved from 90.1 to 96, 76.5 to 90, and 65.3 to 79.5% for gravel, lava rock, and plastic rings. Based on the ammonia and sCOD loadings for different HRTs, the estimated maximum ammonia loading was approximately 0.6 kg $NH_3-N/m^3$-day for the three BAFs of different media types. The zero-order biotransformation rates for the BAF with gravel were found to be higher than the lava rock and plastic ring media. The results ultimately showed that BAF can be used as an add-on system to aerated lagoons or as a secondary treatment unit to meet ammonia discharge limits.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Van Dyke S, Jones S, Ong SK. Cold weather nitrogen removal deficiencies of aerated lagoons. Environ. Technol. 2003;24:767-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385613
  2. M’Coy WS. Biological aerated filters: a new alternative. Water Environ. Technol. 1997;9:39-43.
  3. Peladan JG, Lemmel H, Pujol R. High nitrification rate with upflow biofiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 1996;34:347-353.
  4. Pujol R. Process improvements for upflow submerged biofilters. Water 21 2000;APR:25-29.
  5. Bigot B, Le Tallec X, Badard M. A new generation of biological aerated filters. J. Chartered Inst. Water Environ. Manag. 1999;13:363-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1999.tb01063.x
  6. Hodkinson B, Williams JB, Butler JE. Development of biological aerated filters: A review. J. Chartered Inst. Water Environ. Manag. 1999;13:250-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1999.tb01043.x
  7. Mendoza-Espinosa L, Stephenson T. A review of biological aerated filters (BAFs) for wastewater treatment. Environ. Eng. Sci. 1999;16:201-216. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.1999.16.201
  8. Wheale G, Cooper-Smith GD. Operational experience with biological aerated filters. J. Inst. Water Environ. Manag. 1995;9:109-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1995.tb01600.x
  9. Paffoni C, Gousailles M, Rogalla F, Gilles P. Aerated biofilters for nitrification and effluent polishing. Water Sci. Technol. 1990;22:181-189.
  10. Rogalla F, Badard M, Hansen F, Dansholm P. Upscaling a compact nitrogen removal process. Water Sci. Technol. 1992;26:1067-1076.
  11. Lee J, Kim J, Lee C, Yun Z, Choi E. Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal with biological aerated filter using denitrifying phosphorus accumulating organism. Water Sci. Technol. 2005;52:569-578.
  12. Kim SW, Park JB, Choi E. Possibility of sewage and combined sewer overflow reuse with biological aerated filters. Water Sci. Technol. 2007;55:1-8.
  13. Ha JH, Ong SK. Nitrification and denitrification in partially aerated biological aerated filters with dual size sand media. Water Sci. Technol. 2007;55:9-17.
  14. American Public Health Association, Eaton AD, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed., Washington, D.C., 2002.
  15. Tschui M, Boller M, Gujer W, Eugster J, Mader C, Stengel C. Tertiary nitrification in aerated pilot biofilters. Water Sci. Technol. 1994;29:53-60.
  16. Husovitz K. The Influence of upflow velocity on nitrification performance in a biological aerated filter system [MS Thesis]. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1998.
  17. Boller M, Gujer W. Nitrification in tertiary trickling filters followed by deep-bed filters. Water Res. 1986;20:1363-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90134-X
  18. Gilmore KR, Husovitz KJ, Holst T, Love NG. Influence of organic ammonia loading on nitrifier activity and nitrification performance for a two-stage biological aerated filter system. Water Sci. Technol. 1999;39:227-234.
  19. Nogueira R, Melo LF, Purkhold U, Wuertz S, Wagner M. Nitrifying and hetrotrophic population dynamics in bifilms reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Sci. Technol. 2002;36:469-481.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of aeration on steady-state conditions in non- and partially aerated low-loaded biofilter vol.9, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0073-3
  2. Technology review of the biological aerated filter systems BAFs for removal of the nitrogen in wastewater vol.664, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/664/1/012106