DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computational Fluid Dynamics of Cavitating Flow in Mixed Flow Pump with Closed Type Impeller

  • 투고 : 2010.02.23
  • 심사 : 2010.04.04
  • 발행 : 2010.06.01

초록

LES(Large Eddy Simulation) with a cavitation model was performed to calculate an unsteady flow for a mixed flow pump with a closed type impeller. First, the comparison between the numerical and experimental results was done to evaluate a computational accuracy. Second, the torque acting on the blade was calculated by simulation to investigate how the cavitation caused the fluctuation of torque. The absolute pressure around the leading edge on the suction side of blade surface had positive impulsive peaks in both the numerical and experimental results. The simulation showed that those peaks were caused by the cavitaion which contracted and vanished around the leading edge. The absolute pressure was predicted by simulation with -10% error. The absolute pressure around the trailing edge on the suction side of blade surface had no impulsive peaks in both the numerical and experimental results, because the absolute pressure was 100 times higher than the saturated vapor pressure. The simulation results showed that the cavitation was generated around the throat, then contracted and finally vanished. The simulated pump had five throats and cavitation behaviors such as contraction and vanishing around five throats were different from each other. For instance, the cavitations around those five throats were not vanished at the same time. When the cavitation was contracted and finally vanished, the absolute pressure on the blade surface was increased. When the cavitation was contracted around the throat located on the pressure side of blade surface, the pressure became high on the pressure side of blade surface. It caused the 1.4 times higher impulsive peak in the torque than the averaged value. On the other hand, when the cavitation was contracted around the throat located on the suction side of blade surface, the pressure became high on the suction side of blade surface. It caused the 0.4 times lower impulsive peak in the torque than the averaged value. The cavitation around the throat caused the large fluctuation in torque acting on the blade.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kobayashi, K., Ono, S., Harada, I. and Chiba, Y., 2007, “Prediction of Stress on Pump Blade by One-Way Coupled Method of Fluid and Structure Simulations,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2007-41371
  2. Friedrich-Kari Benra, Hans Josef Dohmen and Bo Wan, 2006, “DETERMINATION OF PUMP IMPELLER DEFLECTIONS: COMPARISON OF FSI-SIMULATIONS TO MEASUREMENTS,” ASME Joint U.S. – European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, Miami, FL. https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2006-98464
  3. Iino, T. and Kasai, K., 1985, “An Analysis of Unsteady Flow Induced by Interaction of Centrifugal Impeller and a Vaned Diffuser,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., (in Japanese), Vol. 51, No. 471, B, pp. 154-159.
  4. Arndt, N., Acosta, A. J., Brennen, C. E. and Caughey, T.K., 1989, “Rotor-Stator Interaction in a Diffuser Pump,” ASME J. of Turbomachinery, Vol. 111, pp. 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3262258
  5. Arndt, N., Acosta, A. J., Brennen, C. E. and Caughey, T.K., 1990, “Experimental Investigation of Rotor-Stator Interaction in a Centrifugal Pump with Several Vaned Diffusers,” ASME J. of Turbomachinery, Vol. 112, pp. 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2927428
  6. Guo, S., Okamoto, H. and Maruta, Y., 2006, “Measurement on the Fluid Forces Induced by Rotor-Stator Interaction in a Centrifugal Pump,” JSME International Journal, Series B, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.49.434
  7. Yamaguchi, Y. and Ito, H., 1981, “Experimental Study for the fluctuation of Stress Caused on Runner Blade of High Head Pump,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., (in Japanese), Vol. 47, No. 413, B, pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.47.95
  8. Fukaya, M., Okamura, T., Tamura, Y. and Matsumoto, Y., 2003, “Prediction of Cavitation Performance of Axial Flow Pump by Using Numerical Cavitating Flow Simulation with Bubble Flow Model,” Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan, November.
  9. Milan, S., Frantisek, M. and Pavel, S., 2001, “Numerical Investigation of Blade and Tip Clearance Geometry Influence on Tip Clearance and Tip Vortex Cavitations,” International Symposium on Experimental and Computational Aerothermodynamics of Internal Flows, Poland, Sept. 4-7.
  10. Okita, K. Matsumoto, Y. and Kamijo, K., 2003, “Numerical Analysis For Unsteady Cavitating Flow in a Pump Inducer,” Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan, November 1-4.
  11. Charles C.S. Song, Xiangying Chen, Tani, K., Shinmei, K., Niikura, K. and Sato, J., 1999, “Simulation of Cavitating Flows in Francis Turbine and Draft Tube Under Off-design Conditions,” 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, California.
  12. Nishimura, K., Kato, C., Yamade, Y., Yamanishi, N. and Tani, N., 2006, “Large Eddy Simulation of Unsteady Cavitating Flows in a Turbopump Inducer,” SEISAN KENKYU, (in Japanese), Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 27-30.
  13. Help Navigator, ANSYS CFX, Release 11.0, ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Multiphase Flow Modeling, Interphase Mass Transfer, Cavitation Model.
  14. Help Navigator, ANSYS CFX, Release 11.0, ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide, Turbulence and Wall Function Theory, Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models, Two Equation Turbulence Models.
  15. Help Navigator, ANSYS CFX, Release 11.0, ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Turbulence and Near-Wall Modeling, Turbulence Models, The Large Eddy Simulation Model (LES).
  16. Help Navigator, ANSYS CFX, Release 11.0, ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Advice on Flow Modeling, Advection Scheme Selection.
  17. Help Navigator, ANSYS CFX, Release 11.0, ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Advice on Flow Modeling, Timestep Selection, Transient Timestep Control, Transient Scheme.

피인용 문헌

  1. Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Cavitating Flow around Balancing Drum of Multistage Pump vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2016.9.2.119
  2. Numerical and experimental research on unsteady cavitating flow around NACA 2412 hydrofoil vol.72, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/72/2/022014
  3. Numerical Simulation of Interaction between Fluid and Vapor Structures in Multiphase Flow around Hydrofoil vol.06, pp.08, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.68137