Immediate Implant Reconstruction using Silicone Prosthesis in Breast Cancer Patients after Skin Sparing Mastectomy

유방암 환자에서 피부보존 유방절제술 후 실리콘 보형물을 이용한 즉시 유방재건술

  • Cho, Young-Kyoo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yang, Jung-Dug (Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Gui-Rak (Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Chung, Ho-Yun (Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Byung-Chae (Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Ho-Yong (Departments of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 조영규 (경북대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 양정덕 (경북대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김귀락 (경북대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 정호윤 (경북대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 조병채 (경북대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 박호용 (경북대학교 의과대학 외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.05.24
  • Accepted : 2010.09.02
  • Published : 2010.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Since skin sparing mastectomy removes the mammary gland and the nipple-areolar complex preserving all mammary skin, it makes the widespread use of implants in immediate reconstruction. This article reports our experience in immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy by using the silicone implants in patients especially who have small to moderate sized and minimal ptotic breast. Methods: From September of 2007 to July of 2009, we performed breast reconstruction for 44 breasts of 40 women with silicone implant after mastectomy. Tumors were divided into 5 malignant types (21 IDC, 18 DCIS, 2 ILC, 2 phylloides tumor, 1 mucinous carcinoma). The implant is placed in a submuscular pocket or in a submuscularsubfascial pocket depending upon the condition of the muscles and skin flaps after mastectomy. Results: The mean age was 47 years and the average follow-up period was 11 months. Cosmetic outcome was assessed by evaluation of photographs and assessment of breast volume and shape, breast symmetry, and overall outcome. About 80% of each of these parameters was scored as good or excellent. Breast complication was developed in a total of 6 cases including 2 capsular contracture, 2 partial skin necrosis due to blue dye injection and 2 implant infection. Conclusion: The use of definitive implants in a skin sparing mastectomy is a one-stage immediate breast reconstruction with low morbidity and acceptable result. This method is considered reliable with favorable aesthetic result.

Keywords

References

  1. Toth BA, Lappert P: Modified skin incision for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 87: 1048, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199106000-00006
  2. Salgarello M, Seccia A, Eugenio F: Immediate breast reconstruction with anatomical permanent expandable implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: aesthetic and technical refinements. Ann Plast Surg 52: 358, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000105914.69611.c7
  3. Tebbetts JB: Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammoplasty: long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74: 636, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198411000-00008
  4. Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, Choy C, A'Hern R, Ward A: Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 125, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200301000-00021
  5. Kim DY, Lee SY, Kim HI, Cho BH, Choi SH: A means for breast volume determination using adhesive plaster & breast volume measurement in Korean female. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr 17: 469,
  6. Kajikawa A, Ueda K, Katsuragi Y, Iida S: Salvage of infected tissue expanders using a new continuous irrigation method with intermittent aspiration. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62: 69, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.09.027
  7. Maddox WA, Carpenter JT Jr, Laws HL, Soong SJ, Cloud G, Urist MM, Balch CM: A randomized prospective trial of radical (Halsted) mastectomy versus modified radical mastectomy in 311 breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 198: 207, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198308000-00016
  8. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, Ames FC, Wang BG, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL: Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: A 6-year follow up. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 421, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199908000-00015
  9. Kang SG: Augmentation mammoplasty using cohesive gel implants. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 15: 1, 2009
  10. Salhab M, Sarakbi W, Mokbel K: Skin and fat necrosis of the breast following methylene blue dye injection for sentinel node biopsy in a patients with breast cancer. Int Semin Surg Oncol 28: 2, 2005
  11. Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Jones GE, Culbertson JH, Schoemann M: Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: The Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200207000-00016
  12. Nahabedian MY: Managing the opposite breast: contralateral symmetry procedures. Cancer J 14:258, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31817fbe2b
  13. Salgarello M, Farallo E: Immediate breast reconstruction with definite anatomical implants after skin-spring mastectomy. Br J Plast Surg 58: 216, 2005
  14. Stevens, LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG, Kister SJ, Gump FE, Forde KA: The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 619, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198404000-00018