The Growth of Osteoblasts according to the Pretreatment of HA Scaffold Surface

하이드록시아파타이트 지지체의 표면 처리 방법에 따른 골아세포의 성장

  • Park, Byung-Chan (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Ha (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Gon (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • LeeYoun-Jung, Jun-Ho (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Sik-Young, Kim (Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Andong National University) ;
  • Choi, Sik-Young (Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Andong National University)
  • 박병찬 (영남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김용하 (영남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김태곤 (영남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이준호 (영남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김연정 (안동대학교 응용화학과) ;
  • 최식영 (안동대학교 응용화학과)
  • Received : 2010.02.12
  • Accepted : 2010.05.11
  • Published : 2010.07.10

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, bioceramics have become popular as a substitute graft material for reconstruction of bony defect after trauma or tumor surgery. Among the bioceramic materials, hydroxyapatite (HA) is favored due to its biocompatibility. HA scaffold is composed of the interconnected reticular framework, macropores and micropores. Macropores play an important role in cell migration, nutrients supply and vascular ingrowth. On the other hand, a number of micropores less than $10{\mu}m$ form an irregular surface on HA scaffolds, which prevents the osteoblast from adhering and proliferating on the surface of HA scaffold. Methods: In this study, three different groups were designed for comparison. In the first group (group A), conventional method was used, in which HA pellet was applied without surface pretreatment. The second group (group B) was given a HA pellet that has been coated with crystalline HA solution prior to application. In the third group (group C), the same method was used as the second group, where the pretreated HA pellet was heated ($1250^{\circ}C$, 1 hour) before application. Osteoblast-like cells ($2{\times}10^4$/mL) were scattered onto every pellet, then they were incubated in 5% $CO_2$ incubator at $37^{\circ}C$ for twelve days. During the first three days, osteoblast cells were counted using the hemocytometer daily. ALP activity was measured on the 3, 6, 9 and 12 culture days using the spectrophotometer. Results: Under SEM, group A showed a surface with numerous micropores, and group B revealed more rough crystal surface. Group C revealed a fused crystal appearance and flattened smooth surface. In proliferation and ALP activity of osteoblast cells, group C showed better results compared to group B. Group A which lacks pretreatment of the surface showed less osteoblast proliferation and ALP activity than group C, but showed better results than group B. Conclusion: We found that crystallized HA with heat treatment method enhances the osteoblasts proliferation and differentiation on the surface of HA pellets.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang BS, Lee CK, Hong KS, Youn HJ, Ryu HS, Chung SS, Park KW: Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials 21: 1291, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00030-2
  2. Wen ZH, Han YS, Liang L, Li JB: Preparation of porous ceramics with controllable pore sizes in an easy and low-cost way. Materials Characterization 59: 1335, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2007.11.010
  3. Ramay HR, Zhang M: Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by combination of the gel-casting and polymer sponge methods. Biomaterials 24: 3293, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00171-6
  4. Teixeira S, Rodriguez MA, Pena P, Aza AH De, Aza SD, Ferraz MP, Monteiro FJ: Physical characterization of hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Science Engineering C 29: 1510, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.052
  5. Borden M, Attawia M, Laurencin CT: The sintered microsphere matrix for bone tissue engineering: in vitro osteoconductivity studies. J Biomed Mater Res 61: 421, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10201
  6. Cho YE, Kim HJ, Kim YH, Choi JW, Kim YJ, Kim GJ, Kim JS, Choi SY, Kwun IS: Bioactive polyglycolic acid (PGA) or polylactic acid (PLA) polymers on extracellular matrix mineralization in osteoblast-like Mc3T3-E1 cells. Nutr Sci 9: 233, 2006
  7. Teixeira S, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP, Vilar R, Eugenio S: Laser surface treatment of hydroxyapatite for enhanced tissue integration: surface characterization and osteoblastic interaction studies. J Biomed Mater Res A 81: 920, 2007
  8. Malmstrom J, Adolfsson E, Emanuelsson L, Thomsen P: Bone ingrowth in zirconia and hydroxyapatite scaffolds with identical macroporosity. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19: 2983, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3045-2
  9. Li SH, Wijn JR, Layrolle P, Groot K: Synthesis of macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 61: 109, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10163
  10. Liu X, Ma PX: Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32: 477, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e
  11. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S: Development of cell-responsive nanophase hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 3: 118, 2007 https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2007.118.124
  12. Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF: Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107; 782, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.023
  13. Kim TG, Park WY, Kim YH, Kim YJ, Choi SY: The effect of collagen coating in crystallized hydroxyapatite scaffold. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 36: 247, 2009