미생물학회지 (Korean Journal of Microbiology)

  • 제46권1호
  • /
  • Pages.33-37
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 0440-2413(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9902(eISSN)
한국미생물학회 (The Microbiological Society of Korea)
권호 표지

호안나대지 식생복원을 위한 Bacillus subtilis 분리균주의 식물생장 촉진능

Plant Growth Promotion by Isolated Strain of Bacillus subtilis for Revegetation of Barren Lakeside Area

  • 김경미 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 송홍규 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과)
  • Kim, Kyung-Mi (Department of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Song, Hong-Gyu (Department of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.02
  • 심사 : 2010.03.15
  • 발행 : 2010.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

근권토양에서 분리한 세균 Bacillus subtilis RFO41은 인산 가용화능이 높고 auxin 등의 식물호르몬을 생산한다. 이 균주를 이용하여 가시도꼬마리(Xanthium italicum Moore)의 생장 촉진 실험을 화천군 파로호의 호안나대지에서 수행하였다. 19주 경과 후 자라난 가시도꼬마리를 채취하여 줄기와 뿌리 길이를 측정하고 식물을 건조시켜 중량을 측정하였다. 균주를 처리한 접종군이 미접종 대조군보다 가시도꼬마리의 건조중량이 67.7%나 높았으며 또한 가시도꼬마리의 줄기 길이도 균주를 처리한 접종군이 미접종 대조군보다 21.1% 길었는데 모두 통계적 유의성을 가졌다. 접종균주의 동태를 denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis 방법으로 조사하였는데 나대지 토양에서 접종균주가 유지되고 있으며 토양의 고유 세균군집에는 큰 영향을 미치지 않는 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 척박한 호안나대지 토양에서 B. subtilis RFO41의 인산가용화능과 식물호르몬의 생성능 등의 식물생장촉진 효과가 가시도꼬마리의 생장에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 판단할 수 있다. 이러한 식물 생장 촉진효과는 친환경적 미생물비료, 특히 민감한 호안나대지 등의 미생물학적 식생복원방법으로서의 가치를 뒷받침하는 것이라 할 수 있다.

Rhizobacterial strain isolated from barren soil, Bacillus subtilis RFO41 exhibits a high level of phosphate solubilizing activity and produces some phytohormones. Its promoting effect on the growth of Xanthium italicum Moore, a wild plant growing at lakeside barren land and thus a good candidate plant for revegetation of barren lakeside was evaluated in the in situ test for 19 weeks at Lake Paro, Kangwon-do. Strain RFO41 could enhance the dry weight of X. italicum by 67.7%. It also increased the shoot length of X. italicum plant by 21.1% compared to that of uninoculated control. Both growth enhancements had statistical significance. However, the inoculation did not show any effect on the root growth, which might be due to the breakage of tiny root. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis showed that the inoculated bacteria were maintained in the soils, and the indigenous bacterial community did not exhibit any significant change. This plant growth promoting capability may be utilized as an environment-friendly and low cost revegetation method, especially for the sensitive areas such as barren lakeside lands.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이강형, 송홍규. 2007. 근권에서 분리한 Bacillus sp.의 적용에 의한 토마토의 생장 촉진. 한국미생물학회지 43, 279-284.
  2. 이강형, 송홍규. 2008. Phytophthora infestans와 Fusarium oxysporum의 생장을 저해하는 Bacillus 분리 균주들의 항진균성 물질 생성능.한국미생물학회지 44, 258-263.
  3. Ahn, T.S., J.O. Ka, G.H. Lee, and H.G. Song. 2007a. Revegetation of a lakeside barren area by the application of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria. J. Microbiol. 45, 171-174.
  4. Ahn, T., J. Ka, G. Lee, and H. Song. 2007b. Microcosm study for revegetation of barren land with wild plants by some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Micobiol. Biotechnol. 17, 52-57.
  5. Compant, S., B. Duffy, J. Nowak, C. Clement, and E.A. Barka. 2005. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4951-4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
  6. Costacurta, A., P. Mazzafera, and Y. Rosato. 1998. Indole-3- acetic acid biosynthesis by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri is increased in the presence of plant leaf extracts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 159, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12863.x
  7. Domenech, J., B. Ramos-Solano, A. Probanza, J.A. Lucas-García, J.J. Colon, and F.J. Gutierrez-Manero. 2004. Bacillus spp. and Pisolithus tinctorius effects on Quercus ilex ssp. ballota: a study on tree growth, rhizosphere community structure and mycorrhizal infection. For. Ecol. Manage. 194, 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.026
  8. Egamberdiyeva, D. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 36, 184-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005
  9. Glick, B.R. 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 41, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1139/m95-015
  10. Johnson, D.L., D.R. Anderson, and S.P. McGrath. 2005. Soil microbial response during the phytoremediation of a PAH contaminated soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 2334-2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.001
  11. Kaufman P.B., L.L. Wu, T.G. Brock, and D. Kim. 1995. Hormones and the orientation of growth, pp. 547-571. In P.J. Davies (ed.), Plant Hormones, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  12. Kende, H. and J. Zeevaart. 1997. The Five "Classical" Plant Hormones. Plant Cell 9, 1197-1210. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.7.1197
  13. Lucas-García, J.A., J. Domenech, C. Santnmaria, M. Camacho, A. Daza, and F.J. Gutiérrez-Mañero. 2004. Growth of forest plants (pine and holm-oak) inoculated with rhizobacteria: relationship with microbial community structure and biological activity of its rhizosphere. Environ. Exp. Botany 52, 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.003
  14. Muzyer, G., C.W. Ellen, and G.U. Andre. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 695-700.
  15. Narsian, V. and H.H. Patel. 2000. Aspergillus aculeatus as a rock phosphate solubilizer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 559-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00184-4
  16. Probanza, A., J.A. Lucas-Garcia, M. Ruiz Palomino, B. Ramos, and F.J. Gutiérrez Manero. 2002. Pinus pinea L. seedling growth and bacterial rhizosphere structure after inoculation with PGPR Bacillus (B. licheniformis CECT 5106 and B. pumilis CECT 5105). Appl. Soil Ecol. 20, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00007-0
  17. Shishido, M. and C.P. Chanway. 1998. Forest soil community responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and spruce seedlings. Biol. Fertil. Soils 26, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050365
  18. Stamford, N.P., P.R. Santo, C.E.S. Snatos, A.D.S. Freitas, S.H.L. Dias, and M.A. Lira, Jr. 2007. Agronomic effectiveness of biofertilizers with phosphate rock, sulphur and Acidithiobacillus for yam bean grown on a Brazilian tableland acidic soil. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 1311-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.037
  19. Strigul, N. and L. Kravchenko. 2006. Mathematical modeling of PGPR inoculation into the rhizosphere. Environ. Model Softw. 21, 1158-1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.06.003
  20. Wu, S.C., Z.H. Caob, Z.G. Lib, K.C. Cheunga, and M.H. Wonga. 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.003