Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of Fermentation Quality of Rice Straw Silage by Application of a Bacterial Inoculant and Glucose

  • Li, Jing (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Shen, Yixin (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Cai, Yimin (National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science)
  • Received : 2009.07.28
  • Accepted : 2009.11.30
  • Published : 2010.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The improvement of the fermentation quality of rice straw silage by application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and glucose was investigated in this study. Sixteen rice varieties were harvested at the maturity stage and the rice straw was ensiled with LAB inoculant ($1{\times}10^5$ cfu/g of fresh weight) and glucose (2% of fresh weight). Inoculation with LAB improved the fermentation as reflected in reductions in pH, acetic acid (by 3.7 to 78.3%), butyric acid (by -6.0 to 100.0%) and ammonia nitrogen (by 1.0 to 71.7%) concentrations, and increases in lactic acid (by 43.9 to 282.9%) and crude protein concentrations compared with the control. Application of LAB plus glucose was more effective in improving fermentation quality than LAB alone. The variety of rice straw which contained relatively high levels of water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) tended to obtain better fermentation quality. The results suggested that LAB application and selection of rice varieties whose straw contained high levels of WSC were effective in improvement of the fermentation quality of rice straw silage.

Keywords

References

  1. Aksu, T., E. Baytok, M. A. Karsli and H. Muruz. 2006. Effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant additives on corn silage composition, organic matter digestibility and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 61:29-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.12.013
  2. AOAC. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  3. Cai, Y. M. 2004. Production and storage management of good quality silage in whole crop rice. Res. Anim. Prod. (in Japanese) 58:957-965.
  4. Cai, Y. M. 2006. Development of lactic acid bacteria inoculant for whole crop rice silage in Japan. In: International Symposium on Production and Utilization of Whole Crop Rice for Feed, Busan, Korea. pp. 85-89.
  5. Dubois, M., K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers and F. Smith. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28:350-353. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  6. Goto, I. and D. J. Minson. 1997. Prediction of the dry matter digestibility of tropical grasses using a pepsin-cellulase essay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2:247-253.
  7. Han, L. J., Q. J. Yan and X. Y. Liu. 1997. The resource of crops straw and their current situation of utilization in China. J. Agric. Eng. (in Chinese). 18:87-91.
  8. Hendenson, N. 1993. Silage additives. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 45:35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90070-Z
  9. Jones, B. A., L. D. Satter and R. E. Muck. 1992. Influence of bacterial inoculant and substrate addition to lucerne ensiled at different dry matter contents. Grass Forage Sci. 47:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1992.tb02243.x
  10. Kim, J. G., E. S. Chung, J. S. Ham, S. H. Yoon, Y. C. Lim and S. Seo. 2006. Development of lactic acid bacteria inoculant for whole crop rice silage in Korea. In: International Symposium on Production and Utilization of Whole Crop Rice for Feed, Busan, Korea. pp. 77-82.
  11. Madrid, J., A. Martinez-Teruel, F. Hernandez and M. D. Megias. 1999. A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79:1722-1726. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199909)79:12<1722::AID-JSFA427>3.0.CO;2-S
  12. McDonald, P., A. C. Stirling, A. R. Henderson and R. Whittenbury. 1964. Fermentation studies on inoculated herbages. J. Sci. Food Agric. 15:429-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740150701
  13. Muck, R. E. 1993. The role of silage additives in making high quality silage. In: Proceedings of the National Silage Production Conference on Silage Production from Seed to Animal, Syracuse, NY, USA. pp. 106-116.
  14. Nishino, N. and S. Uchida. 1999. Laboratory evaluation of previously fermented juice as a fermentation stimulant for Lucerne silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79:1285-1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990715)79:10<1285::AID-JSFA362>3.0.CO;2-M
  15. Rooke, J. A., A. J. Borman and D. G. Armstrong. 1990. The effect of inoculation with Lactobacillus plantarum on fermentation in laboratory silos of herbage low in water-soluble carbohydrate. Grass Forage Sci. 45:143-152 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1990.tb02195.x
  16. Seale, D. R., A. R. Henderson, K. O. Pettersson and J. F. Lowe. 1986. The effect of addition of sugar and inoculation with two commercial inoculants on the fermentation of lucerne silage in laboratory silos. Grass Forage Sci. 41:61-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1986.tb01793.x
  17. Taylor, C. C., N. J. Ranjit, J. A. Mills, J. M. Neylon and J. L. Kung. 2002. The effect of treating whole-crop barley with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1793-1800. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74253-7
  18. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutual detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  19. Weatherburn, M. W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal. Chem.39:971-974. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045
  20. Woolford, M. K. 1984. The silage fermentation. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.
  21. Wu, X. J. and L. J. Han. 2005. Effect of lactobacillus on quality of early indica rice silage. J. China Agric. Univ. (in Chinese). 10:35-39.
  22. Xing, L. 2004. Study on the effects of lactobacillus and cellulase additives on the quality of different silages (in Chinese). Master Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
  23. Zahiroddini, H., J. Baah, W. Absalom and T. A. McAllister. 2004. Effect of an inoculant and hydrolytic enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of whole crop barley silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 117:317-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.08.013

Cited by

  1. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and urea treatment on fermentation quality, digestibility and ruminal fermentation of roll bale rice straw silage in wethers vol.58, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2012.00244.x
  2. The effect of lactic acid bacterial starter culture and chemical additives on wilted rice straw silage vol.87, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12449
  3. Adding distiller's grains and molasses on fermentation quality of rice straw silages vol.46, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150851
  4. Adding sweet potato vines improve the quality of rice straw silage vol.88, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12690
  5. Development of a new lactic acid bacterial inoculant for fresh rice straw silage vol.30, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0287
  6. Characterization of sugar metabolism in the stem of Tachisuzuka, a whole-crop silage rice cultivar with high sugar content in the stem vol.21, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1461016
  7. Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage vol.2016, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7985167
  8. A simple method for squeezing juice from rice stems and its use in the high-throughput analysis of sugar content in rice stems vol.19, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943x.2015.1128099
  9. Effect of urea- and molasses-treated sugarcane bagasse on nutrient composition and in vitro rumen fermentation in dairy cows vol.52, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2018.11.010
  10. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculants on Fermentation of Low Moisture Fresh Rice Straw Silage at Different Storage Periods vol.39, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5333/kgfs.2019.39.3.165
  11. In vitro digestibility of fermented rice straw combined with different levels of green concentrate vol.492, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012026
  12. Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Nutritive Value and In Vitro Ruminal Digestibility of Maize and Rice Straw Silage vol.10, pp.21, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217801
  13. Lactobacillus casei TH14 and additives could modulate the quality, gas kinetics and the in vitro digestibility of ensilaged rice straw vol.104, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13426
  14. Novel Crabtree negative yeast from rumen fluids can improve rumen fermentation and milk quality vol.11, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85643-2