Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers (대한환경공학회지)

Korean Society of Environmental Engineers (대한환경공학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of the $SO_2$ Removal Efficiency by Mixing Enhancement Shape

혼합 촉진 장치의 형상에 따른 탈황효율 비교

  • Chung, Jin-Do (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Jang-Woo (Dvision of Display Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Bae, Young-Peel (School of Graduate, Department of Semiconductor & Display Engineering, Hoseo University)
  • 정진도 (호서대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김장우 (호서대학교 디스플레이공학부) ;
  • 배영필 (호서대학교 대학원 반도체디스플레이공학과)
  • Received : 2008.10.20
  • Accepted : 2009.12.14
  • Published : 2010.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study is to research applicable possibility of DSI (Dry Sorbent Injection) technique in $SO_2$ removal process using lab-scale facility based on 500MW in capacity coal-fired thermal power plant operated by South Korea N. Power Co., Ltd. To increase the $SO_2$ removal efficiency, it is considered the mixing enhancement as different shapes called lobed-plate and stepplate tested ultimately for optimum shape. Also it tested to analysis $SO_2$ removal efficiency by numbers of injection holes. At experimental it showed the $SO_2$ removal efficiency is higher using mixing enhancement than not installed mixing enhancement and case on the step-plate was shown the most $SO_2$ removal efficiency. Also, $SO_2$ removal efficiency was higher recording which will increase the injection holes case on not installed mixing enhancement. But, the $SO_2$ removal efficiency was higher 4 injection holes case on installed mixing enhancement.

본 연구의 목적은 대형 석탄 화력 발전소에 DSI (Dry Sorbent Injection)공정을 실제 적용 할 경우에 실현 가능성에 대한 연구로서 N 발전(주)의 S 화력발전본부에서 운용중인 500MW급 석탄화력 발전시설의 보일러 후단에서 전기 집진기 전 단까지를 모델로 삼아 Lab-scale 실험장치를 제작하여 탈황효율을 높이기 위한 실험을 수행하였다. 이를 위하여 Lobedplate와 Step-plate라는 혼합촉진장치를 고안하고 각각 형상을 달리하여 궁극적으로 탈황효율을 높이기 위한 혼합촉진장치의 최적 형상도출을 위한 실험을 수행하였으며 부수적으로 탈황제의 분사구의 개수에 따른 탈황효율 또한 분석하였다. 그 결과 혼합촉진장치가 설치된 경우가 더 높은 탈황 효율을 나타내었고 형상에서는 계단형상일 경우 가장 높은 탈황효율을 보였다. 또한, 탈황제의 분사구의 개수에 따른 탈황효율은 혼합 촉진 장치가 설치되지 않은 경우, 분사구의 개수가 증가할수록 높은 탈황 효율을 보였으나 혼합촉진장치가 설치된 경우는 분사구의 개수가 4개일 경우가 이론적 결과와 같이 가장 높은 탈황효율을 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 홍진표," 배연탈황 기술 현황 및 개발방향,"기계저널, 40(7), pp. 40-44(2000).
  2. 손한호, "화력발전소 배연탈황설비 및 기술에 관한 연구,"진주산업대학원, pp. 2-10(2005)
  3. Jin-do Chung, Jang-woo Kim, Byung-hwan Kim, Young-moon Park, "Numerical analysis for improving of SO2 removal efficiency in the DSI(Dry Sorbent Injection Technology) of FGD system(1),,"KSEE, 29(1), 47-53(2007).
  4. Paul S. Nolan, "Flue Gas Desulfurization Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants,"Coal-Tech 2000 International Conference, (2000)
  5. 박재만, 신창섭, "소석회를 사용한 In-duct형 건식탈황공정의 최적화와 첨가제의 영향,"한국산업안전학회지, 12(2),102-110(1997).
  6. Energy and Environmental research corporation, "Global approach for enhanced mass transger effects in duct flue gas desulfurization processes,"DOE report No. DOE/PC/88873-T6, (1988)
  7. Rice, R. M. and Bond, G. A., "Flue gas desulfurization by induct dry scrubbing using calcium hydroxide,"AIChE J, 36(3), 473-477(1990). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690360318
  8. 정진도, 김장우"Vortex에 의한 DSI 공정 중 혼합효율 향상에 관한 연구,"한국액체미립화학회지, 14(1), 1-7, (2009)
  9. Vuthaluru. H. B. , V. K Pareek. and R. Vuthaluru., "Multiphase flow simulation of a simplified coal pulveriser,"Fuel Processing Techlology, 1195-1205(2005).
  10. Crowe C. , M. Sommerfield, Yutaka Tsuji, "Multiphase Flows with Droplets and particles,"CRC Press, (1998).
  11. Stouffer, M. R., Yoon, H. and Burke, F. P.," An Investigation of the Mechanisms of flue gas Desulfurization by in duct dry sorbent injection,"Ind Eng. Chem. Res., 28(1) 20-27(1989) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00085a005
  12. Babu, M., Forsythe, Runyon, C. V., Evans, E., Thompson, J. L., "Results of 1.0 MM Btu/hour testing of HALT(Hydrate additon at low temperature) for $SO_{2}$ Control,"Proceedings of the joint symposium on Dry $SO_{2}$ and Simultaneous $SO_{2}$/NOx control technologies, 2, pp. 1/34-32/34(1986)
  13. Hall B. W., C. Singer, W. Jozewicz," Current Status of Advacate process for flue gas desulfurization,"Report No. EPA/600/D- 91/173, (1991)
  14. Sedman C. B, M. A. Maxwell, W. Jozewicz, and J. C. S Chang, "Commercial development of the advacate process for flue gas desulfurization,"Report No. EPA/600/D-90/147, (1990)
  15. Stouffer M. R., W. A. Rosenhoover, and J. A. Withum, "Advanced coolside desulfurization process,"Environ. prog., 12(2), 133-139(1993) https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670120211
  16. Stouffer Yoon, H., M. R., Rosenhoover, W. A., Withum, J. A. and Burke, F. P., "Pilot process variable study of coolside desulfurization."Environ. prog., 7(2), 104-111(1988) https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.3300070211