접수의 채취부위 및 접수와 대목의 고정법에 따른 장미 접삽묘의 생육 특성

Effect of Topophysis and Uniting Method of Rootstock and Scion on Rooting and Subsequent Growth of Stenting-propagated (Cutting-grafted) Roses

  • 박유경 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK21) 원예학과) ;
  • 정병룡 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK21) 원예학과)
  • Park, Yoo-Gyeong (Deptartment of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Byoung-Ryong (Deptartment of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2009.10.06
  • 심사 : 2010.03.19
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

본 실험은 국내 육성 절화 장미의 효율적인 접삽목 방법을 확립하고자 국내에서 육성된 절화장미($Rosa$ $hybrida$ Hort.)를 사용하여 접수의 채취 부위와 접수와 대목의 고정법에 따른 접삽묘의 발근과 그 이후의 생장에 대하여 조사하였다. 스탠다드 계통의 'Sweet Yellow'와 'Hanmaum' 품종과 스프레이 계통의 'Chelsi'와 'May' 품종을 사용하였다. 대목은 $Rosa$ $indica$ 'Major'를 사용하여 접삽목하여 암면큐브($50{\times}50{\times}50mm$, Delta, Grodan, Denmark)에 식재한 후 온실에 옮기기 전에 접목활착실에서 5일간 저장하였다. 대목의 가시와 잎을 제거하고 상부와 하부의 구분을 위해 마디 사이의 눈을 남기고 한 마디씩 절단하였다. 접삽묘의 활착률을 높이기 위해 굵기가 유사한 접수와 대목을 골라 두 개를 동시에 잡고 날카로운 칼을 이용하여 $45^{\circ}$로 절단하였다. 접수로는 3매엽과 7매엽 마디를 제외하고 5매엽 마디를 사용하였다. 접수의 채취부위는 줄기의 하단에서부터 상(7-9마디), 중(4-6마디), 하(1-3마디)의 3등분 하여 처리하였다. 접수와 대목의 고정법은 튜브, 튜브+파라필름, 튜브+클립 및 클립 고정법을 사용하였다. 채취부위와 품종에 따라 접삽묘의 발근과 생장에 영향을 미쳤다. 발근은 상(7-9마디) 부위에서 좋았다. 채취부위에 따라 발근율, 발근수, 최대근장에서 유의성이 있었으나 신초와 뿌리의 생체중과 건물중, 신초장, 접목활착율은 유의적인 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 접삽묘의 발근과 생장은 접수와 대목의 고정법과 품종에 따라 영향을 받았다. 튜브 고정법은 다른 고정법과 비교 시 대체적으로 접목활착율, 발근율, 발근수에서 높았다. 하지만 접수와 대목의 접목부위가 완벽하게 융합하지 못해 이상비대 하였다. 전체적으로 접삽묘의 발근과 생장에 가장 좋은 고정법은 튜브+클립 고정법으로 나타났다. 클립 고정법은 'Sweet Yellow' 품종을 제외하고 다른 세 품종에서는 생육이 좋지 않았다. 이러한 결과로 튜브+클립 고정법이 가장 효율적인 방법으로 생각되며 시간과 노동력을 절감할 수 있어 기존의 방법인 튜브+파라필름 고정법을 대체할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of topophysis, and uniting method of rootstock and scion on rooting and subsequent growth of stenting-propagated cut rose ($Rosa$ $hybrida$ Hort.) in an effort to develop an efficient stenting propagation method for domestic rose cultivars. Four cultivars used in this study were two standard type cultivars 'Sweet Yellow' and 'Hanmaum', and two spray type cultivars 'Chelsi' and 'May'. Scions were grafted on cuttings of a rootstock $Rosa$ $indica$ 'Major'. The stenting-propagated scion-rootstock unions were planted in rockwool cubes ($50{\times}50{\times}50mm$, Delta, Grodan, Denmark) and were placed in a graft-take chamber for five days before being placed on misted greenhouse beds. The rootstock was removed of all leaves and nodes. Both the base of scions and top of stocks were simultaneously cut at a $45^{\circ}$ angle for grafting. Scions were prepared as single node cuttings, each with a five-leaflet leaf. Three positions of topophysis used were 7-9th (top), 4-6th (middle), and 1st-3rd (bottom) nodes from the stem base. Four uniting materials used were tube, tube + parafilm wrap, tube + clothespin, and clothespin. Rooting and growth were affected by the topophysis and cultivar. The best topophysis for rooting was 7-9th (top) nodes in all cultivars. Topophysis affected percent rooting, and number of roots, length of the longest root, and but not weight, shoot length and graft-take. Rooting and growth were affected by the uniting method and cultivar. Tube uniting method generally showed higher percentage graft-take, percent rooting, and number of roots than other methods. However, rootstock and scion union was not complete in this treatment. On the whole, the greatest rooting and subsequent growth of stenting-propagated plants were found in the tube + clothespin method. Except 'Sweet Yellow', rooting and growth were not adequate in the clothespin method. The results suggested that a tube + clothespin method was the most effective, and this method may be used as a substitute to save labor compared to a tube + parafilm wrap method which is currently being used in commercial nurseries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bredmose, N. and J. Hansen. 1995. Regeneration, growth and flowering of cut rose cultivars as affected by propagation material and method. Sci. Hort. 64:103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(95)00819-3
  2. Bredmose, N., K. Kristiansen, and B. Nielsen. 2004. Propagation temperature, PPFD, auxin treatment, cutting size cutting position affect root formation, axillary bud growth and shoot development in miniature rose (Rosa hybrid L.) plants and alter homogeneity. J. Sci. Hort. 79:458-465.
  3. Cabrera, R.I. 2002. Rose yield, dry matter partitioning and nutrient status responses to rootstock selection. Sci. Hort. 95:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00020-1
  4. Chung, S.K. 1994. Studies on the simple installation, cutting propagation and root-zone warming for rockwool cultivation in cut roses (Rosa hybrida). Ph.D. Thesis. Wonkwang Univ., Iksan, Korea.
  5. Chung, S.K., Y.J. Park, W.H. Kim, Y.N. Oh, E.K. Lee, and B.H. Kwack. 1998. Study on the growth and rooting rate of cuttings for rockwool culture of roses (Rosa hybrida). J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 39:203-206.
  6. Institute for Horticultural Plant Breeding (I.V.T.). 1985. Ann. Report I.V.T. 85:998.
  7. Jensen, H.E.K. and W. Hansen. 1971. Keeping quality of roses. I. The influence of the stage of maturity at the time of harvest on the longevity and opening of the flower. Danish J. Plant and Soil Sci. 75:591-596.
  8. Jeong, B.R., Y.S. Chae, and J.H. Kang, 1998. Development of technology in hydroponic culture and plug seedling production of greenhouse crops. Report to Korea Research Foundation. p. 3-8.
  9. Jeong, J.W., S.J. Hwang, S.M. Park, and B.R. Jeong. 2007. Effect of length of cutting, number of leaflets attached and cutting position on rooting and growth of cuttings of Rosa hybrida L. 'Red Sandra' and 'Little Marble'. Kor. J. Bio-Environ. Control 16:115-120.
  10. Lee, S.K. 2000. Effect of rootstock and uniting method of rootstock on the growth characteristics. J. Bio-Environ. Control 9:71-90.
  11. Ministry of Agriculture and Forest (MAF). 2008. Annual report of floriculture.
  12. Mercurio, G. 2007. Cut rose cultivation around the world. Schreurs Press, The Netherlands.
  13. Nazari, F., M. Khosh-Khui, and H. Salehi. 2009. Growth and flower quality of four Rosa hybrid L. cultivars in response to propagation by stenting or cutting in soilless culture. Sci. Hort. 119:302-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.08.004
  14. Van den Berg, G.A. 1987. Influence of temperature on bud break, shoot development, flower bud atrophy and winter production of glasshouse roses. Ph.D. Thesis. Centrale Offsetdrukkerij PUDOC, Wageningen. The Netherlands.
  15. Van de Pol, P.A., M.H.A.J. Joosten, and H. Keizer, 1986. Stenting of roses, starch depletion and accumulation during the early development. Acta Hort. 189:51-59.
  16. Van der Pol, P.A. and G. Glorie. 1988. Growth analysis of four types of the rose cv. Motrea. Acta Hort. 226:679-686.
  17. Wagenknecht, J. and A. Radke, 1987. Anzucht wurzelechter Rosen und Vergleich ihrer Leistungsfahigkeit mit veredelten Pflanzen im Gewachshaus. Gartenbau 34:249-251.