Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Politics as usual? De-equalizing rhetoric of political parties on the World Wide Web

  • Soon, Carol (Communications and New Media Programme, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore)
  • Published : 2010.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, Jason P. 2001. Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly 22(1): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590020022600
  2. Anderson, David M., and Michael Cornfield. 2003. The civic web: online politics and democratic values. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  3. Banerjee, Indrajit. 2002. The locals strike back? Gazette: The International Journal for Communications Studies 64(6): 517-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640060101
  4. Bimber, Bruce. 1999. The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication 16(4): 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198569
  5. Castells, Manuel. 2004. The power of identity. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
  6. Chia, Sue-Ann. 2008. Political videos on Net for next GE. The Straits Times, August 19, pp. A4.
  7. Coffey, Amanda, and Paul Atkinson. 1996. "Concepts and Coding," In Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary research strategies, ed. Amanda Coffey & Paul Atkinson, 26-53. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  8. Cunha, Carlos, Irene Martin, James Newell, and Luis Ramiro. 2003. Southern European parties and party systems, and the new ICTs. In Political parties and the Internet: Net gain?, ed. Rachel K. Gibson, Paul Nixon & Stephen Ward, 70-97. London: Routledge.
  9. Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1998. New media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Della Porter, Donatella, and Mario Diani. 2006. Social movements: an introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  11. Dertouzos, Michael. 1997. What will be: How the new information marketplace will change our lives. San Francisco: Harper.
  12. Diani, Mario. 2000. Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society 3(3): 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180051033333
  13. Garrido, Maria, and Alexander Halavais. 2003. Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, ed. Martha McCaughey & Michael D. Ayers, 145-164. New York: Routledge.
  14. Gibson, Rachel, and Stephen J. Ward. 1998. U.K. political parties and the Internet: "Politics as usual" in the new media?" The Harvard Journal of Press & Politics 3(2): 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X98003003003
  15. Gomez, James. 2002. Internet politics: Surveillance and intimidation in Singapore. Singapore: Think Centre.
  16. Gurak, Laura, and John Logie. 2003. Internet protests from text to web. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, ed. Martha McCaughey & Michael D. Ayers, 25-46. New York: Routledge.
  17. Hill, Kevin, and John E. Hughes. 1998. Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  18. Ho, Kuan Chong, Zaheer Baber, and Habibul Khondker. 2002. 'Sites' of resistance: alternative websites and state-society relations. British Journal of Sociology 53(1): 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120109366
  19. Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. Annual Survey on Infocomm Usage in Households and by Individuals for 2006. http://www.ida.gov.sg/doc/Publications/Publications_Level2/20061205092557/hh06_public_v4.4.pdf (accessed June 1, 2007)
  20. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
  21. Kalathil, Shanthi, and Taylor C. Boas. 2003. Open networks, closed regimes. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  22. Kluver, Randy. 2007. The Internet and the expansion of political discussion in Singapore elections. Paper presented at International Communication Association conference, May 24-28, in San Francisco, CA, U.S.
  23. Kluver, Randy, and Indrajit Banerjee, I. 2005. The Internet in nine Asian nations. Information, Communication & Society 8(1): 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500066847
  24. Koh, Winston, and Kam Wong Poh. 2005. Competing at the frontier: The changing role of technology policy in Singapore's economic strategy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 72: 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.006
  25. Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. CODE and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  26. Liu, Dejun. (1999). The Internet as a mode of civic discourse: The Chinese virtual community in North America. In Civic discourse, civil society, and Chinese communities, ed. Randy Kluver and John H. Powers, 195-208. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  27. Margolis, Michael, David Resnick, and Johnathan Levy. 2003. Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle: US elections and the Internet. In Political parties and the Internet: Net gain?, ed. Rachel K. Gibson, Paul Nixon & Stephen Ward, 53-69. London: Routledge.
  28. Murdock, Graham, and Peter Golding. 1989. Information poverty and political inequality: Citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication 39: 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01051.x
  29. Negroponte, Nicholas. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.
  30. Norris, Pippa. 2000. A virtuous circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic phoenix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Paolino, Philip, and Daron R. Shaw. 2003. Can the Internet help outsider candidates win the presidential nomination? Political Science and Politics 36(2): 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503002063
  33. Park, Han Woo. 2003. Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections 25(1): 49-61.
  34. Polletta, Francesca, and James M. Jasper. 2001. Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 27:83-305
  35. Porter, David. 1997. Internet culture. United Kingdom: Routledge.
  36. Poster, Mark. 1997. Cyberdemocracy - Internet and the public sphere. In Internet culture, ed. David Porter, 201-218. United Kingdom: Routledge.
  37. Resnick, David. 1997. Politics on the Internet: The normalization of cyberspace. New Political Science 41-42: 47-67.
  38. Rodan, Garry. 1998. The Internet and Political Control in Singapore. Political Science Quarterly 113(1): 63-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657651
  39. Rodan, Garry. 2003. Special issue on electronic media, markets and civil society in East and Southeast Asia: Introduction. The Pacific Review 16(4): 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000132209
  40. Rogers, Richard, and Nootje Marres. 2000. Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of Science 9(2): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/301
  41. Ryan, Gery, and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15(1): 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
  42. Schneider, Steven, and Kirsten Foot. 2002. Online action for political action: Exploring presidential campaign web sites from the 2000 American election. Javnost The Public 2(5): 1-17.
  43. Schwartz, Ed. 1996. Netactivism: How citizens use the Internet. Sebastapol, CA: Songline Studios, Inc.
  44. Shapiro, Andrew. 1999. The Control Revolution. New York: PublicAffairs.
  45. Soon, Carol, and Randolph Kluver. (2007). The Internet and online political communities in Singapore. Asian Journal of Communication 17(3): 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980701458331
  46. Stein, Laura. 2007. National social movement organizations and the World Wide Web: A survey of web-based activities and attributes. Paper presented at International Communication Association conference, May 24-28, in San Francisco, CA, U.S.
  47. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Kirsten Foot. 2002. Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Commuication, 8(1). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue1/stromerand foot.html (accessed July 23, 2003)
  48. Tan, Tarn How 2002. Probe in Web articles spook Net community. The Straits Times, July 6, pp. H2.
  49. Tremayne, Mark. 2007. Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media. New York: Routledge.
  50. Vegh, Sandor. 2003. Classifying forms of online activism - The case of cyberprotest against the World Bank. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, ed. Martha McCaughey & Michael D. Ayers, 71-95. New York: Routledge.
  51. Ward, Stephen, Rachel Gibson, and Paul Nixon. 2003. Introduction. In Political parties and the Internet: Net gain?, ed. Rachel K. Gibson, Paul Nixon & Stephen Ward, 1-10. London: Routledge.
  52. Ward, Stephen, Rachel Gibson, and Paul Nixon. 2003. Parties and the Internet. In Political parties and the Internet: Net gain?, ed. Rachel K. Gibson, Paul Nixon & Stephen Ward, 11-38. London: Routledge.
  53. Warnick, Barbara. 2001. Rhetorical criticism in new media environments. Rhetoric Review 20: 60-65.