RESISTANCE TO DEMINERALIZATION OF ENAMEL OF PRIMARY TEETH ACCORDING TO RESTORATIONS: IN VITRO STUDY USING QLF

유치 수복물에 따른 주변 법랑질의 탈회 저항성: QLF를 이용한 연구

  • Kwon, Hae-Sook (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hyun, Hong-Keun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jae (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Wook (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang, Ki-Taeg (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hahn, Se-Hyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 권해숙 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 현홍근 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김영재 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김정욱 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 장기택 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종철 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 한세현 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상훈 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실)
  • Published : 2010.02.26

Abstract

The objective of this in vitro study was to detect and monitor demineralization and remineralization of primary teeth according to restorative materials using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). A single bur hole was drilled on the each sound forty eight primary anterior teeth, and the specimens were divided into three groups. The cavity was restored with $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250(Group 1), F2000(Group 2), $Ketac^{TM}$ N100(Group 3) following the manufacturer's instructions. The teeth were subjected to the demineralizing buffer for 3 days, and then subjected to a remineralizing buffer for 14 days. The change of mineral loss(${\Delta}Q$) according to the stages was evaluated by QLF and the following results were obtained: 1. When demineralization was done, ${\Delta}Q$ was increased as follows. : Group 1 ($-110.79\;{\pm}\;27.77$) < Group 2 ($-104.84\;{\pm}\;28.95$) < Group 3 ($-90.16\;{\pm}\;21.87$) : Resistance to demineralization was statistically significant in Group 3. 2. There was a statistically significant increase in ${\Delta}Q$ of all groups since 1st day of remineralization 3. The rate of remineralization, ${\Delta}$(${\Delta}Q$)/day, showed significant high value in each group on the 1st day then decreased rapidly. 4. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of remineralization among restorative materials.

본 연구에서는 유치 수복물의 불소 방출 여부에 따른 주변 법랑질의 탈회 저항성과 재광화 효과를 살펴보고자 하였다. 건전 유전치 48개를 16개씩 임의로 세 군으로 나누어, $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250(1군), F2000(2군), $Ketac^{TM}$ N100(3군)을 사용하여 제조사의 지시에 따라 충전하였다. 3일 동안 인공 우식 병소를 유발한 후, 14일 동안 인공 타액에 담가 재광화를 유발하였다. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence(QLF)를 이용하여 실험 단계와 시간에 따른 무기질 소실량(${\Delta}Q$)의 변화를 관찰한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 탈회가 일어난 인공 우식 병소의 ${\Delta}Q$ 값은 3군, 2군, 1군 순으로 작게 나타났고, 이 중 3군은 1군에 비해 유의한 탈회 저항성을 보였다. 2. 1군, 2군, 3군 모두 재광화 1일 후부터 초기 인공 우식 병소의 ${\Delta}Q$ 값과 비교 시 유의한 차를 보였으며, 관찰 기간 동안 지속적인 증가 양상을 나타내었다. 3. 재광화 속도를 의미하는 ${\Delta}$(${\Delta}Q$)/일 값은 각 군에서 처음 1일 동안 유의성 있게 크게 나타났으며, 그 이후 급속히 감소하였다. 4. 수복 재료에 따른 재광화 정도는 각 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General-executive summary. Rockville (MD): National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
  2. Kagihara LE, Niederhauser VP, Stark M : Assessment, management, and prevention of early childhood caries. J Am Acad Nurse Pract, 21:1-10, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00367.x
  3. Mjor IA : Placement and replacement of restoration. Oper Dent, 6:49-54, 1981.
  4. Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH : Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc, 112:39-45, 1986.
  5. Featherstone JD : Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27:31-40, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x
  6. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz C : Biological factors in dental caries enamel structure and the caries process in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 2). J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28:119-124, 2004.
  7. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz C : Biological factors in dental caries: role of remineralization and fluoride in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 3). J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28:203-214, 2004.
  8. Arends J, ten Bosch JJ : Demineralization and remineralization evaluation techniques. J Dent Res, 71 Spec No:924-928, 1992.
  9. Reynolds EC : Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phophopeptide-stabilized calcium phophate solutions. J Dent Res, 76:1587-1595, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760091101
  10. Benson PE, Pender N, Higham SM : An in situ caries model to study demineralization during fixed orthodontics. Clin Orthod Res, 2:143-153, 1999.
  11. Ogaard B, Rolla G : The in vivo orthodontic banding model for vital teeth and the in situ orthodontic banding model for hard-tissue slabs. J Dent Res, 71 Spec No:832-835, 1992.
  12. Fontana M, Li Y, Dunipace AJ, et al. : Measurement of enamel demineralization using microradiography and confocal microscopy. A correlation study. Caries Res, 30:317-325, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262337
  13. Stookey GK : Quantitative light fluorescence: a technology for early monitoring of the caries process. Dent Clin North Am, 49:753-770, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.009
  14. 황규선, 김종수, 유승훈 : Digital imaging fiber-optic trans- illumination과 laser fluorescence를 이용한 평활면 초기우식증의 재광화에 관한 비교 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 34:183-191, 2007.
  15. Caliskan Yanikoglu F, Ozturk F, Hayran O, et al. : Detection of natural white spot caries lesions by an ultrasonic system. Caries Res, 34:225-232, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016595
  16. 김효석, 김왕근, 이창섭, 이상호 : 초기우식병소에 대한 레이저 fluorescence의 광학적 탐지감도. 대한소아치과학회지, 26:109-118, 1999.
  17. Stookey GK : Optical methods-quantitative light fluorescence. J Dent Res, 83 Spec No C:C84-88, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301S17
  18. Pretty IA, Pender N, Edgar WM, Higham SM : The in vitro detection of early enamel de- and re-mineralization adjacent to bonded orthodontic cleats using quantitative light-induced fluorescence. Eur J Orthod, 25:217-223, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.3.217
  19. Higham SM, Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Smith PW : The use of in situ models and QLF for the study of coronal caries. J Dent, 33:235-241, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.016
  20. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM : The effect of ambient light on QLF analysis. J Oral Rehabil, 29:369-373, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00914.x
  21. Takagi S, Liao H, Chow LC : Effect of a low-fluoride- content, two-component rinse on fluoride uptake and on de- and remineralization of enamel lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res, 35:223-228, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047460
  22. Forsten L : Fluoride release and uptake by glassionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials, 19:503-508, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00130-0
  23. Suljak JP, Hatibovic-Kofman S : A fluoride releaseadsoprtion- release system applied to fluoridereleasing restorative materials. Quintessence Int, 27:635-638, 1996.
  24. Forsten L : Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand J Dent Res, 99:241-245, 1991.
  25. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T : Review on fluoride- releasing restorative materials-Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343-362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  26. ten Cate JM, Featherstone JD : Physicochemical aspects of fluoride-enamel interaction. In: Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Bust BA, editors. Fluoride in dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 252-272, 1996.
  27. Bell A, Creanor SL, Foye RH, et al. : The effect of saliva on fluoride release by a glass-ionomer filling material. J Oral Rehabil, 26:407-412, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00389.x
  28. Itota T, Nakabo S, Torii Y, et al. : Effect of fluoridereleasing liner on demineralized dentin. Quintessence Int, 37:297-303, 2006.
  29. Moura JS, Lima EM, Paes Leme AF, et al. : Effect of luting cement on dental biofilm composition and secondary caries around metallic restorations in situ. Oper Dent, 29:509-514, 2004.
  30. Shinkai RS, Cury AA, Cury JA : In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration. Oper Dent, 26:52-59, 2001.
  31. Gonzalez Ede H, Yap AU, Hsu SC : Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent, 29:578-585, 2004.
  32. Han L, Edward C, Okamoto A, et al. : A comparative study of fluoride-releasing adhesive resin materials. Dent Mater J, 21:9-19, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.9
  33. Yamamoto H, Iwami Y, Unezaki T, et al. : Fluoride uptake around cavity walls; two-dimensional mapping by electron probe microanalysis. Oper Dent, 25:104-112, 2000.
  34. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P : Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res, 18:250-257, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260773
  35. Silverstone LM : Effect of oral fluid and synthetic calcifying fluids in vitro on remineralization of enamel lesion. Clin Prev Dent, 4:13-22, 1982.
  36. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM : Initiation and progression of caries-like lesions of enamel: effect of periodic treatment with synthetic saliva and sodium fluoride. Caries Res, 19:481-489, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260886
  37. Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer EA, Marks LA, et al. : Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glassionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Biomaterials, 19:509-519, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00131-2
  38. Attin T, Kielbassa AM, Plogmann S, Hellwig E. : Fluoride and cations release from compomers in the acidic and neutral environment. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, 51:675-678, 1996.
  39. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK : Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent, 27:259-265, 2002.
  40. Heinrich-Weltzien R, K?hnisch J, Ifland S, et al. : Detection of initial caries lesions on smooth surfaces by quantitative light-induced fluorescence and visual examination: an in vivo comparison. Eur J Oral Sci, 113:494-498, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00255.x
  41. Ando M, van Der Veen MH, Schemehorn BR, Stookey GK : Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques. Caries Res, 35:464-470, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047491
  42. Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg CM, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B : A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113:595-602, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70218-5
  43. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP : Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. J Dent, 24:91-94, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00051-8
  44. McCabe JF : Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials, 19:521-527, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00132-X
  45. Atkinson HF, Matthews E : An investigation into the permeability of human deciduous enamel. Br Dent J, 86:142-145, 1949.
  46. Takagi S, Liao H, Chow LC : Effect of tooth-bound fluoride on enamel demineralization/ remineralization in vitro. Caries Res, 34:281-288, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016603
  47. 송주현, 김영재, 김정욱 등 : QLF를 이용한 항우식 제품의 인공우식 재광화 효과에 대한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 35: 287-295, 2008.