Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of newly formed synthetic peptide on bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

  • Choi, Jung-Yoo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Eom, Tae-Kwan (Implant R&D Center, Osstem Implant Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Jung (Implant R&D Center, Osstem Implant Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Significant interest has emerged in the design of cell scaffolds that incorporate peptide sequences that correspond to known signaling domains in extracellular matrix and bone morphogenetic protein. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone regenerative effects of the synthetic peptide in a critical-size rat calvarial defect model. Methods: Eight millimeter diameter standardized, circular, transosseus defects created on the cranium of forty rats were implanted with synthetic peptide, collagen, or both synthetic peptide and collagen. No material was was implanted the control group. The healing of each group was evaluated histologically and histomorphometrically after 2- and 8-week healing intervals. Results: Surgical implantation of the synthetic peptide and collagen resulted in enhanced local bone formation at both 2 and 8 weeks compared to the control group. When the experimental groups were compared to each other, they showed a similar pattern of bone formation. The defect closure and new bone area were significantly different in synthetic peptide and collagen group at 8 weeks. Conclusions: Concerning the advantages of biomaterials, synthetic peptide can be an effective biomaterial for damaged periodontal regeneration.

Keywords

References

  1. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  2. Minabe M. A critical review of the biologic rationale for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1991;62:171-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.3.171
  3. Nyman S, Karring T, Lindhe J, Planten S. Healing following implantation of periodontitis-affected roots into gingival connective tissue. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb02012.x
  4. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction, 1965. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;395:4-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200202000-00002
  5. Dettin M, Conconi MT, Gambaretto R, Bagno A, Di Bello C, Menti AM, et al. Effect of synthetic peptides on osteoblast adhesion. Biomaterials 2005;26:4507-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.023
  6. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, Mitsock LM, Whitters MJ, Kriz RW, et al. Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 1988;242:1528-34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3201241
  7. Celeste AJ, Iannazzi JA, Taylor RC, Hewick RM, Rosen V, Wang EA, et al. Identification of transforming growth factor beta family members present in bone-inductive protein purified from bovine bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:9843-7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.9843
  8. Sampath TK, Maliakal JC, Hauschka PV, Jones WK, Sasak H, Tucker RF, et al. Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (hOP-1) induces new bone formation in vivo with a specific activity comparable with natural bovine osteogenic protein and stimulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biol Chem 1992;267:20352-62.
  9. Hong SJ, Kim CS, Han DK, Cho IH, Jung UW, Choi SH, et al. The effect of a fibrin-fibronectin/beta-tricalcium phosphate/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 system on bone formation in rat calvarial defects. Biomaterials 2006;27:3810-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.045
  10. Saito A, Suzuki Y, Ogata S, Ohtsuki C, Tanihara M. Accelerated bone repair with the use of a synthetic BMP-2-derived peptide and bone-marrow stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:77-82.
  11. Frankel AD, Pabo CO. Cellular uptake of the tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus. Cell 1988;55:1189-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90263-2
  12. Schwarze SR, Hruska KA, Dowdy SF. Protein transduction: unrestricted delivery into all cells? Trends Cell Biol 2000;10:290-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01771-2
  13. Benoit DS, Anseth KS. The effect on osteoblast function of colocalized RGD and PHSRN epitopes on PEG surfaces. Biomaterials 2005;26:5209-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.045
  14. Frame JW. A convenient animal model for testing bone substitute materials. J Oral Surg 1980;38:176-80.
  15. Caton J, Mota L, Gandini L, Laskaris B. Non-human primate models for testing the efficacy and safety of periodontal regeneration procedures. J Periodontol 1994;65:1143-50. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.12.1143
  16. Freeman E, Turnbull RS. The value of osseous coagulum as a graft material. J Periodontal Res 1973;8:229-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1973.tb00762.x
  17. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:299-308.
  18. Selvig KA. Discussion: animal models in reconstructive therapy. J Periodontol 1994;65:1169-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.12.1169
  19. Saito A, Suzuki Y, Ogata S, Ohtsuki C, Tanihara M. Activation of osteo-progenitor cells by a novel synthetic peptide derived from the bone morphogenetic protein-2 knuckle epitope. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003;1651:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00235-8
  20. Masuko T, Iwasaki N, Yamane S, Funakoshi T, Majima T, Minami A, et al. Chitosan-RGDSGGC conjugate as a scaffold material for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005;26:5339-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.062
  21. Reddi AH. Role of morphogenetic proteins in skeletal tissue engineering and regeneration. Nat Biotechnol 1998;16:247-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0398-247
  22. Groeneveld EH, Burger EH. Bone morphogenetic proteins in human bone regeneration. Eur J Endocrinol 2000;142:9-21. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1420009
  23. Wang EA, Rosen V, D'Alessandro JS, Bauduy M, Cordes P, Harada T, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:2220-4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.6.2220
  24. Hollinger JO, Schmitt JM, Buck DC, Shannon R, Joh SP, Zegzula HD, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and collagen for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:356-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4<356::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-7
  25. Uludag H, Friess W, Williams D, Porter T, Timony G, D'Augusta D, et al. rhBMP-collagen sponges as osteoinductive devices: effects of in vitro sponge characteristics and protein pI on in vivo rhBMP pharmacokinetics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;875:369-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08519.x

Cited by

  1. Cobalt chromium alloy with immobilized BMP peptide for enhanced bone growth vol.29, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21409
  2. Effects of Laser and Ozone Therapies on Bone Healing in the Calvarial Defects vol.24, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3182a244ae
  3. The effect of local simvastatin application on critical size defects in the diabetic rats vol.25, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12177
  4. Effect of rhBMP‐2 dose on bone formation/maturation in a rat critical‐size calvarial defect model vol.41, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12270
  5. Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on wound healing in calvarial defects vol.73, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.942876
  6. Effect of Local Rosuvastatin Administration on Calvarial Bone Defects vol.27, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002763
  7. The Effect of Local Rosuvastatin on Mandibular Fracture Healing vol.27, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003120
  8. The Local Effect of Puerarin on Critical-Sized Calvarial Defects vol.28, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003271
  9. Effects of Ankaferd BloodStopper on bone healing in an ovariectomized osteoporotic rat model vol.13, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4166
  10. The Effect of Strontium Ranelate Gel on Bone Formation in Calvarial Critical Size Defects vol.5, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.164