DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Incentives of Partnering Approach in the Construction Industry: Perceptions of Local and Foreign Sectors in the Vietnamese Market

  • Le-Hoai, Long (Pukyong National University, Interdisciplinary program of construction engineering and management) ;
  • Lee, Young-Dai (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Pukyong Nat. Univ.) ;
  • Son, Jeong-Jul (Pukyong National University, Interdisciplinary program of construction engineering and management)
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

Traditional procurement methods have revealed many disadvantages especially the adversarial relationship between parties. After several decades of application, partnering has shown that it is an innovative arrangement that help to reduce many problems having existed in traditional arrangement. It can provide a win-win working attitude in a construction project. Partnering in construction has been applied in several ways in recent years in Vietnam. This mechanism can help both local and foreign construction participants to mutually offset their differences when implementing projects. This paper has investigated and introduced the incentives of partnering from Vietnam perspective in terms of foreign and local participants perceptions. It has been shown that 'to learn mutually among participants' and 'to increase bidding advantages' are the most important incentives according to foreign and local practitioners respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2007). ADB OKs $15M Loan to Aid Poverty Reduction Program in Viet Nam, Retrieved at: http://www.adb.org/media/Articles/2007/12204-vietnamese-poverties-reductions/
  2. Beach, R., Webster, M., Campell, K.M. (2005). An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry. Int. J. Project Manage. 23, 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.04.001
  3. Bennett, J. and Peace, S. (2006). Partnering in the construction industry. A code of practice for strategic collaborative working. Butterworth-Heinemann, 30 Corporate Drive, Burlington, MA.
  4. Black, C., Akintoye, A, Fitzgerald, E. (2000). An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 18, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00046-0
  5. Bresnen, M., Marshall, N. (2000). Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances. Constr. Manage. Econom. 18, 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900407392
  6. Chan, A.P.C, Chan, D.W.M, Ho, K.S.K (2003). An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Constr. Manage. Econom. 21, 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000056162
  7. Chan, A.P.C., Chan, D.W.M., Chiang, Y.H., Tang, B.S., Chan, E.H.W., Ho, K.S.K. (2004). Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects. J. Constr. Engine. Manage. (ASCE), 130(2), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(188)
  8. Cheng, E.W.L. and Li, H. (2004). "Development of a practical model of partnering for construction projects". Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (ASCE), 130(6), 790-798. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(790)
  9. Koraltan, S.B. and Dikbas, A (2002). An assessment of the applicability of partnering in the Turkish construction sector. Constr. Manage. Econom. 20, 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210125554
  10. Larson, E. (1997). Partnering on construction projects: a study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success. IEEE Transaction on Engine. Manage. 44(2), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.584926
  11. Le-Hoai, L., Lee, YD., Lee, J.Y. (2008). Delay and Cost Overruns in Vietnam Large Construction Projects: A Comparison with Other Selected Countries. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(6), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-0367-7
  12. Li, H., Cheng, E.W.L., Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z. (2001). Cooperative benchmarking: a tool for partnering excellence in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 19, 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00033-2
  13. Lu, S. and Yan, H. (2007a). A model for evaluating the applicability of partnering in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 25, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.009
  14. Lu, S. and Yan, H. (2007b). An empirical study on incentives of strategic partnering in China: Views from construction companies. Int. J. Project Manage. 25, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.004
  15. Naoum, S. (2003). An overview into the concept of partnering. Int. J. Project Manage. 21, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00059-X
  16. Phua, F.T.T. (2006). When is construction partnering likely to happen? An empirical examination of the role of institutional norms. . Constr. Manage. Econom. 24(6), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500521256
  17. Tang, W., Duffield, C.F., Young, D.M. (2006). Partnering mechanism in construction: an empirical study on the Chinese construction industry. J. Constr. Engine. Manage. (ASCE), 132(3), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(217)
  18. Toor, S.R. and Ogunlana, S.O. (2008). "Critical COMs of success in large-scale construction projects: Evidence from Thailand construction industry". International Journal of Project Management, 26, 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.003
  19. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business, A Skill Building Approach, 4th Ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  20. Vietnamese General Statistics Office (GSO). Statistical Data (Vietnamese). Retrieved at: http://www.gso.gov.vn/