Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-4
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

감염근관에서의 apical preparation size

APICAL PREPRATION SIZE IN INFECTED ROOT CANALS

  • 금기연 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실, 치의학연구소, BK21 Program)
  • Kum, Kee-Yeon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, BK21 Program, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2010.01.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

감염근관에서의 주치근단 파일의 크기는 학자들마다 많은 논란이 되고 있지만 최근 여러 연구 결과들은 감염근관의 효과적인 세정을 위해서는 근단부 확대 크기가 증가해야 함을 보여주고 있다. 따라서 임상가는 감염근관의 치료 시 새로운 개념에 맞는 치료 전략을 가지고 근관치료에 임해야 한다.

The final preparation (MAF) size in infected root canals is still controversial. Nonetheless, recent studies demonstrated that larger apical preparation sizes produces a greater reduction in remaining bacteria and dentinal debris as compared to smaller apical preparation sizes. Therefore, clinicians should be practiced with treatment strategies guided by evidence-based information, especially in infected/failed root canals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposure of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20: 340-349, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90166-0
  2. Sundqvist G. Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. Umea University Odontological Dissertations No.7, 1976.
  3. Figdor D. Microbial etiology of endodontic treatment failure and pathologic properties of selected species. Umea University Odontological Dissertations No.79, 2002.
  4. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriological evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321-328, 1981.
  5. Falk KW, Sedgley CM. The influence of preparation size on the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro. J Endod 31:742-745, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000158007.56170.0c
  6. Jung IY, Seo MA, Fouad AF, Spangberg LSW, Lee SJ, Kum KY. Apical anatomy of mesiobuccal and mesial root of permanent first molars. J Endod 31: 112-117, 2005.
  7. Drummer PMH, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 17:192-198, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1984.tb00404.x
  8. Peters OA, Scho nenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J, 34, 221-230, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x
  9. Baugh D, Wallace J. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: A review of the literature. J Endod 31:333-40, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000145422.94578.e6
  10. Rollison S, Barnett F, Stevens R. Efficacy of bacterial removal from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instrumentation technique and size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Radiol Endod 94:366-371. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.126164
  11. Grossman LI. Endodontic practice 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1970.
  12. Barroso JM, Guerisoli DMZ, Capelli A, Saquy PC, Pe cora JM. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary premolars: SEM analysis. Braz Dent J 16:30-34, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402005000100005
  13. Silveria LFM, Martos J, Pintado LS, Teixeeira RA, Neto JBC. Early preflaring and crown-down shaping influences the first file binds to the canal apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:e99-e101, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.010
  14. Kfir A, Rosenberg E, Fuss Z. Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and non tapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102: 395-398, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.11.017
  15. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of the curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 79:492-496, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80134-9
  16. Shuping G, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 26:751-755, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00022