DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modal rigidity center: it's use for assessing elastic torsion in asymmetric buildings

  • Georgoussis, George K. (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE))
  • Received : 2009.12.11
  • Accepted : 2010.03.24
  • Published : 2010.06.25

Abstract

The vertical axis through the modal center of rigidity (m-CR) is used for interpreting the code torsional provisions in the design of eccentric multi-story building structures. The concept of m-CR has been demonstrated by the author in an earlier paper and the particular feature of this point is that when the vertical line of the centers of mass at the floor levels is passing through m-CR, minimum base torsion is developed. For this reason the aforesaid axis is used as reference axis for implementing the code provisions required by the equivalent static analysis. The study examines uniform mixed-bent-type multistory buildings with simple eccentricity, ranging from torsionally stiff to torsionally flexible systems. Using the results of a dynamic response spectrum analysis as a basis for comparisons, it is shown that the results of the code static design are on the safe side in torsionally stiff buildings, but unable to predict the required strength of bents on the stiff side of systems with a predominantly torsional response. Suggestions are made for improving the code provisions in such cases.

Keywords

References

  1. Anastassiadis, K., Athanatopoulou, A. and Makarios, T. (1998), "Equivalent static eccentricities in the simplified methods of seismic analysis of buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 14(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585986
  2. Cheung, V.W.T. and Tso, W.K. (1986), "Eccentricity in irregular multistory buildings", Can. J. Civil. Eng., 13, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1139/l86-007
  3. Coull, A. and Puri, R.D. (1968), "Analysis of pierced shear walls", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 94(1),71-82.
  4. Dempsey, K.M. and Tso, W.K. (1982), "An alternative path to seismic torsional provisions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 1, 3-10.
  5. Georgoussis, G.K. (2006), "A simple model for assessing periods of vibration and modal response quantities in symmetrical buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 15, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.286
  6. Georgoussis, G.K. (2008), "Optimum design of multi-story uniform structures with simple eccentricity", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 17(3), 719-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.376
  7. Georgoussis, G.K. (2009), "An alternative approach for assessing eccentricities in asymmetric multistory buildings. 1 elastic systems", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 18(2), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.401
  8. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1993), "Seismic code analysis without locating centers of rigitidy", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 119(10), 3039-3055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:10(3039)
  9. Harasimowicz, A.P. and Goel, R.K. (1998), "Seismic code analysis of multi-storey asymmetric buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 27, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199802)27:2<173::AID-EQE724>3.0.CO;2-W
  10. Heidebrecht, A.C. (1975), "Dynamic analysis of asymmetric wall- frame buildings", ASCE, National Structural Engineering Convention, New Orleans, LA.
  11. Heidebrecht, A.C. and Stafford Smith, B. (1973), "Approximate analysis of tall wall-frame structures", J. Struct. Div. - ASCE, 2, 169-183.
  12. Humar, J.L. (1984), "Design for seismic torsional forces", Can. J. Civil Eng., 12, 150-163.
  13. Jacobsen, L.S. and Ayre, R.S. (1958), Engineering vibrations, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  14. Makarios, T. (2005), "Optimum torsion axis to multistory buildings by using the continuous model of the structure", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 14(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.262
  15. Makarios, T. (2008), "Practical calculation of the torsional stiffness radius of multistorey tall buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 17(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.316
  16. Makarios, T. and Anastassiadis, K. (1998a), "Real and fictitious elastic axis of multi-storey buildings: theory", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 7(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199803)7:1<33::AID-TAL95>3.0.CO;2-D
  17. Makarios, T. and Anastassiadis, K. (1998b), "Real and fictitious elastic axis of multi-storey buildings: applications", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 7(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199803)7:1<57::AID-TAL96>3.0.CO;2-0
  18. Makarios, T., Athanatopoulou, A. and Xenidis, H. (2006), "Numerical verification of properties of the fictitious elastic axis in asymmetric multistorey buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 15(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.294
  19. Marino, E.M. and Rossi, P.P. (2004), "Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 13, 277-290 https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.252
  20. Newmark, N.M. and Rosenblueth, E. (1972), Fundamentals of earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  21. Pauley, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), Seismic design of reinforced and masonry buildings, Wiley Interscience.
  22. Pool, R.A. (1977), "Analysis for torsion employing provisions of NZRS 4203:1974", Bull. N. Zealand Soc. Earthq. Eng., 10, 219-225.
  23. Riddel, R. and Vasquez, J. (1984), "Existence of centers of resistance and torsional uncoupling of earthquake response of buildings", Proc. 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol 4, 187-194.
  24. Smith, B.S. and Vezina, S. (1985), "Evaluation of centers of resistance in multistorey building structures", Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Part 2, 79(4), 623-635. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1985.761
  25. Tena-Colunga, A. and Perez-Osornio, MA. (2005), "Assessment of shear deformations on the seismic response of asymmetric shear wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 131(11), 1774-1779. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1774)
  26. Tso, W.K. (1990), "Static eccentricity concept for torsional moment estimations", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 116(5), 1199-1212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1199)
  27. Tso, W.K. and Cheung, V.W.T. (1986), "Decoupling of equations of equilibrium in lateral load analysis of multistory buildings", Comput. Struct., 23(5), 679-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(86)90076-3
  28. Tso, W.K. and Dempsey, K.M. (1980), "Seismic torsional provisions for dynamic eccentricity", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 8, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080307
  29. Zhu, T.J. and Tso, W.K. (1992), "Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions II: strength distribution", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 21, 629-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210705

Cited by

  1. An approach for minimum rotational response of medium-rise asymmetric structures under seismic excitations vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630049
  2. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305
  3. Modified seismic analysis of multistory asymmetric elastic buildings and suggestions for minimizing the rotational response vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.1.039
  4. Design Principles for Minimum Torsional Response of Wall-Frame Concrete Structures 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1360222
  5. Preliminary Structural Design of Wall-Frame Systems for Optimum Torsional Response vol.11, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0183-2
  6. The use of Modal Rigidity Center for Assessing Code Provisions in Asymmetric Buildings vol.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.158
  7. Centres of rigidity in multi-storey asymmetric diaphragm systems for general lateral static loading vol.150, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.072
  8. Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity vol.42, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0091
  9. Design aspects for minimizing the rotational behavior of setbacks buildings vol.10, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1049
  10. Seismic assessment of existing r.c. framed structures with in-plan irregularity by nonlinear static methods vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.401
  11. Seismic Behavior of Horizontally Irregular Structures: Current Wisdom and Challenges Ahead vol.68, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034725
  12. Locating optimum torsion axis in asymmetric buildings subjected to seismic excitation vol.171, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00068
  13. Accounting for Torsional Response in Direct Displacement-based Design of Plan-asymmetric Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings vol.23, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1739-x
  14. Dynamic eccentricities and the “capable near collapse centre of stiffness” of reinforced concrete single-storey buildings in pushover analysis vol.166, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.056
  15. The effect of mass eccentricity on the torsional response of building structures vol.67, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.6.671
  16. The effect of accidental eccentricities on the inelastic torsional response of buildings vol.75, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.2.145
  17. Mitigating mass eccentricity effects on the rotational response of setbacks structures: An analytical solution for linear systems vol.28, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.062
  18. Conditions of structural irregularity. Relationships with observed earthquake damage in Mexico City in 2017 vol.143, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106630