Assessment Procedure of Safety Integrity Level(SIL) Based on Flowchart

플로우차트 기반 안전무결성수준 평가 절차

  • Received : 2010.01.04
  • Accepted : 2010.02.26
  • Published : 2010.06.25

Abstract

Functional safety is the part of the overall safety of a system that depends on the system or equipment operating correctly in response to its inputs, including the safe management of likely operator errors, hardware failures, systematic failures, and environmental changes. One of the essential concepts of functional safety is Safety Integrity Level(SIL). It is defined as a relative level of risk-reduction provided by a safety function, or to specify a target level of risk reduction. In this paper, each element of SIL assessment will be defined. Based on each element, specific process of SIL selection will be established by using flowchart. The flowchart provides a SIL assessment guideline for functional safety engineers. The proposed theory will be verified by applying to a oil refining plant for SIL assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. 지식경제부 기술표준원(2006), "KS A IEC 61882 위험운전성(HAZOP)- 연구 적용지침", 한국표준협회.
  2. Hector Javier Cruz-Campa and M. Javier Cruz-Gomez(2010), "Determine SIS and SIL Using HAZOPS", Process Safety Progress, vol.29, p.22-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10293
  3. IEC TR 61508-0(1998), Functional Safety of Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems– Part 0: Functional safety and IEC 61508.
  4. IEC 61508(1998a), "Functional Safety of Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems– Part 1: General Requirements.
  5. IEC 61508(2000), Functional Safety of Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems– Part 2: Requirements for Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems.
  6. IEC 61508(1998b), Functional Safety of Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems– Part 3: Software Requirements.
  7. IEC 61508(1998c), Functional Safety of Electrical / Electronic / Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems– Part 5: Examples of Methods for the Determination of Safety Integrity Levels.
  8. J. Beugin, D. Renaux and L. Cauffriez(2007), "A SIL quantification approach based on an operating situation model for safety evaluation in complex guided transportation systems", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol.92, p.1686-1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.022
  9. K.A.L. Van Heel, B. Knegterting and A. C. Brombacher(1999), "Safety Lifecycle Management : A Flowchart Presentation of the IEC 61508 Overall Safety Lifecycle Model", Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol.15, p.493-500. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199911/12)15:6<493::AID-QRE299>3.0.CO;2-X
  10. Kirkwood, D. and Tibbs, B.(2005), "Developments in SIL determination", IEE Computing and Control Engineering, vol.16(3), p.21-27. https://doi.org/10.1049/cce:20050303
  11. Lawrence Beckman(1998), "Determining the required safety integrity level for your process", ISA Transactions, vol.37, p.105-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00011-1
  12. Night Hyatt(2009), "Guidelines for Process Hazards Analysis, Hazards Identification and Risk Analysis", DYADEM.
  13. Smith, David J. and Simpson, Kenneth G. L.(2004), "Functional Safety: A Straightforward Guide to Applying IEC 61508 and Related Standards", Butterworth-Heinemann.
  14. The UK Offshore Operators Association(1999), "Guidelines for Instrumented-Based Protective Systems", Issue No.2.