Clinical Analysis of Patients with Abdomen or Neck-penetrating Trauma

복부와 경부 관통상 환자에 대한 임상적 고찰

  • Noh, Ha-Ny (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Min (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Joon-Beom (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ryu, Hoon (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Bae, Keum-Seok (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Seong-Joon (Department of Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 노하니 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 김광민 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 박준범 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 류훈 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 배금석 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 강성준 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.08.16
  • Accepted : 2010.10.20
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, the change to a more complex social structure has led to an increased frequency of traumas due to violence, accident and so on. In addition, the severity of the traumas and the frequency of penetrating injuries have also increased. Traumas to cervical and abdominal areas, what are commonly seen by general surgeons, can have mild to fatal consequences because in these areas, various organs that are vital to sustaining life are located. The exact location and characteristics of the injury are vital to treating patients with the trauma to these areas. Thus, with this background in mind, we studied, compared, and analyzed clinical manifestations of patients who were admitted to Wonju Christian hospital for penetrating injuries inflicted by themselves or others. Methods: We selected and performed a retrospective study of 64 patients who had been admitted to Wonju Christian Hospital from January 2005 to December 2009 and who had cervical or abdominal penetrating injuries clearly inflicted by themselves or others. Results: There were 51 male (79.7%) and 13 female (20.3%) patients, and the number of male patients was more dominant in this study, having a sex ratio of 3.9 to 1. The range of ages was between 20 and 86 years, and mean age was 43.2 years. There were 5 self-inflicted cervical injuries, and 19 self-inflicted abdominal injuries, making the total number of self-inflicted injury 24. Cervical and abdominal injuries caused by others were found in 11 and 29 patients, respectively. The most common area involved in self-inflicted injuries to the abdomen was the epigastric area, nine cases, and the right-side zone II was the most commonly involved area. On the other hand, in injuries inflicted by others, the left upper quadrant of the abdomen was the most common site of the injury, 14 cases. In the neck, the left-side zone II was the most injured site. In cases of self-inflicted neck injury, jugular vein damage and cervical muscle damage without deep organ injury were observed in two cases each, making them the most common. In cases with abdominal injuries, seven cases had limited abdominal wall injury, making it the most common injury. The most common deep organ injury was small bowel wounds, five cases. In patients with injuries caused by others, six had cervical muscle damage, making it the most common injury found in that area. In the abdomen, small bowel injury was found to be the most common injury, being evidenced in 13 cases. In self-inflicted injuries, a statistical analysis discovered that the total duration of admission and the number of patients admitted to the intensive care unit were significantly shorter and smaller, retrospectively, than in the patient group that had injuries caused by others. No statistically significant difference was found when the injury sequels were compared between the self-inflicted-injury and the injury-inflicted-by-others groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that, in self-inflicted abdominal injuries, injuries limited to the abdominal wall were found to be the most common, and in injuries to the cervical area inflicted by others, injuries restricted to the cervical muscle were found to be the most common. As a whole, the total duration of admission and the ICU admission time were significantly shorter in cases of self-inflicted injury. Especially, in cases of self inflicted injuries, abdominal injuries generally had a limited degree of injury. Thus, in our consideration, accurate injury assessment and an ideal treatment plan are necessary to treat these patients, and minimally invasive equipment, such as laparoscope, should be used. Also, further studies that persistently utilize aggressive surgical observations, such as abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography, for patients with penetrating injuries are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Kent AL, Jeans P, Ewards JR, Byrne PD. Ten year review of thoracic and abdominal penetrating trauma management. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:772-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00339.x
  2. Waseem M, Gernsheimer J. A penetrating neck injury: trivial trauma with serious consequences. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010;26:126-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce3009
  3. Hyun SY, Oh SW, Kim JK, Lim YS, Yang HJ, Lee G, et al. Clinical Analysis of Patients with Thorax or Neck Trauma Treated with Emergent Operations. Journal of the Korean Society of Traumatology 2003;16:116-23.
  4. Kim HJ, Kim HS, Seo KW, Ju JK, Ryu SY, Kim JC, et al. Analysis of the Prognostic Factors for Abdominal Trauma. Journal of the Korean Society of Traumatology 2007;20:12-8.
  5. Ko YG, Kim BJ, Baek KJ, Cho YU, Kim JS. A Clinical Analysis of Abdominal Stab Injuries for Five Years. Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2003;14:536-43.
  6. Lee JH, Ji HS, Park Ki, Kim CK. Surgical Management of Abdominal Stab Wound Journal of The Korean Surgical Society 1985;28:550-9.
  7. Chun KH, Lee DS, Sung GY, Song MH, Kim W, Park IY, et al. A Clinical Study of Abdominal Stab Wounds Journal of The Korean Surgical Society 1999;57:959-66.
  8. Van Brussel M, Van Hee R. Abdominal stab wounds: a five-year patient review. Eur J Emerg Med 2001;8:83-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200103000-00051
  9. Cayten CG, Frangiopane L, Poladora F, Inouye W. Abdominal stab wounds: a ten-year review of 204 patients Am Surg 1982;48:250-4.
  10. Taviloglu K. When to operate on abdominal stab wounds. Scand J Surg 2002;91:58-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690209100109
  11. Leppaniemi AK, Voutilainen PE, Haapiainen RK. Indications for early mandatory laparotomy in abdominal stab wounds. Br J Surg 1999;86:76-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00968.x
  12. van Haarst EP, van Bezooijen BP, Coene PP, Luitse JS. The efficacy of serial physical examination in penetrating abdominal trauma. Injury 1999;30:599-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00159-X
  13. Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B. Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. A prospective study of 651 patients. Ann Surg 1987;205:129-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198702000-00005
  14. Leppaniemi A, Salo J, Haapiainen R. Complications of negative laparotomy for truncal stab wounds. J Trauma 1995;38:54-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199501000-00016
  15. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE. CT scan evaluation of blunt hepatic trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:399-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70031-2
  16. Soto JA, Morales C, Munera F, Sanabria A, Guevara JM, Suarez T. Penetrating stab wounds to the abdomen: use of serial US and contrast-enhanced CT in stable patients. Radiology 2001;220:365-71. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.2.r01au10365
  17. Lin HF, Wu JM, Tu CC, Chen HA, Shih HC. Value of diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for abdominal stab wounds. World J Surg 2010;34:1653-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0485-5
  18. Gorecki PJ, Cottam D, Angus LD, Shaftan GW. Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for trauma: a technique of safe and systematic exploration. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:195-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200206000-00013
  19. Chol YB, Lim KS. Therapeutic laparoscopy for abdominal trauma. Surg Endosc 2003;17:421-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8808-8
  20. Bell RB, Osborn T, Dierks EJ, Potter BE, Long WB. Management of penetrating neck injuries: a new paradigm for civilian trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:691-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.044
  21. Insull P, Adams D, Segar A, Ng A, Civil I. Is exploration mandatory in penetrating zone II neck injuries? Anz Journal of Surgery 2007;77:261-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04030.x
  22. Bukur M, Inaba K, Barmparas G, DuBose JJ, Lam L, Branco BC, et al. Self-inflicted penetrating injuries at a Level I Trauma Center. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 2010;41:1013-6.
  23. Asensio JA, Chahwan S, Forno W, MacKersie R, Wall M, Lake J, et al. Penetrating esophageal injuries: Multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 2001;50:289-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200102000-00015