Journal of Trauma and Injury

The Korean Society of Traumatology (대한외상학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Compliance, Time Required for Diagnosis and Pain of Patients with Finger Tendon Injury Between Gross and Ultrasonographic Confirmation

손가락 힘줄 손상환자에서 육안 검사와 초음파 검사의 순응도, 시간, 통증의 비교

  • Lee, Seo-Woo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Jae (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Won (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sae-Hoon (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Woo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital)
  • 이서우 (순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 박현재 (순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 이정원 (순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 박세훈 (순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 김재우 (순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.14
  • Accepted : 2010.09.13
  • Published : 2010.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: It is not always easy to determine the existence of tendon injuries when it comes to patients with finger lacerations. Thus, we tried to find the difference in effectiveness and in compliance of patients when we employed two different types of diagnosis, conventional gross confirmation and ultrasonographic confirmation. Methods: From December 2009 to March 2010, we enrolled 14 patients with finger tendon injury at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital. The median age of the patients was $35.9{\pm}14.4$, and the ratio of females to males was 1:2.5 We evaluated the compliance of each patient by measuring four different categories (level of cooperativeness in showing their wound and in following the instructions, level of movement of their fingers during the diagnosis and total number of attempts to diagnose) by using a score from 1 to 3 for each category, for a total possible score of 12 for each patient. We also measured the painfulness of each patient by using a score of 1 to 10 and the time required for each diagnosis. Results: The levels of patients' compliance was $8.9{\pm}2.1$ when diagnosed with gross confirmation and $9.8{\pm}2.1$ when diagnosed with ultrasonographic confirmation (p value=0.042). The pain score of the patients was $3.7{\pm}1.7$ with gross confirmation and $2.9{\pm}1.2$ with ultrasonographic confirmation (p value=0.020). The median duration of time in each test was $6.7{\pm}4.8$ minutes with gross confirmation and $10.5{\pm}4.2$ minutes with ultrasonography (p value=0.006). Conclusion: Comparing gross confirmation and ultrasonographic confirmation, gross confirmation is a better method than ultrasonography because of time efficiency. However, ultrasonographic confirmation has advantages over gross confirmation in pain scale and better compliance of patients. Emergency physicians generally employ gross confirmation rather than ultrasonography in determining the existence of tendon injury in patients. In patients with finger lacerations without bone injury, ultrasonography can be considered as a secondary diagnostic tool, especially when patients have much pain.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung MS, Baek GH. Hand Surgery. Seoul: KoonJa: 2005:259-62.
  2. Choi CY, Lee HJ, Choi HJ, Kim MS. The Usefulness of Ultrasound Diagnosis of Acute Tendon Injury in Hand. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;35:729- 34.
  3. Wang PT, Bonavita JA, Delone FX Jr, McClellan RM, Witham RS. Ultrasonic assistance in the diagnosis of hand flexor tendon injuries. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:403. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199904000-00009
  4. Zanetti M, Hodler J. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance tomography of tendon injuries. Orthopade 1995;24:200-8.
  5. Rockwell WB, Butler PN, Byrne BA. Extensor tendon: anatomy, injury and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1592-603. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200012000-00024
  6. De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Osteaux M, Jager T, Machiels F, Van Roy P. Sonography of a rupture of the tendon of the extensor pollicis longus muscle: initial clinical experience and correlation with findings at cadaveric dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:175. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840175
  7. Harrison BP, Hilliard MW. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of hand injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17:793-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70098-5
  8. Elson RA. Rupture of the central slip of the extensor hood of the finger. A test for early diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:229-31.
  9. Hart RG, Uehara DT, Kutz JE. Extensor tendon injuries of the hand. Emerg Med Clin North A 1993;11:637-49.
  10. Daenen B, Houben G, Bauduin E, Debry R, Magotteaux P. Sonography in wrist tendon pathology. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:462. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20071
  11. Khaleghian R, Tonkin LJ, De Geus JJ, Lee JP. Ultrasonic examination of the flexor tendons of the fingers. J Clin Ultrasound 1984;12:547-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870120904
  12. Moschilla G, Breidahl W. Sonography of the finger. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1451-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781451
  13. Ebrahim FS, De Maeseneer M, Jager T, Marcelis S, Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA. US diagnosis of UCL tears of the thumb and Stener lesions: technique, patternbased approach, and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2006;26:1007-20. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.264055117
  14. Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI: which do I choose? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005;9:135-49. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872339
  15. Wong DC, Wansaicheong GK, Tsou IY. Ultrasonography of the hand and wrist. Singapore Med J 2009;50:219-25.
  16. Bianchi S, Cohen M, Jacob D. Tendons: traumatic lesions. J Radiol 2005;86:1845-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81534-3
  17. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF. Ultrasound of tendon tears. Part 1: general considerations and upper extremity. Skeletal Radiol 2005;34:500-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0956-1
  18. Campbell RS, Grainger AJ. Current concepts in imaging of tendinopathy. Clin Radiol 2001;56:253-67. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0653
  19. Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Hubach PC, Klasens JH, Algra PR, Bijlsma JW. Comparison of sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of partial tears of finger extensor tendons in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology(Oxford) 2000;39:55-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/39.1.55
  20. Park JR, Youn CS, So BH, Kim JH, Kim HM, Park KN, et al. The Efficacy of Ultrasound Diagnosis of a Partial Tendon Injury by Emergency Doctors Using a Swine Model. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2010;21:82-7.