Utility of Brain Computed Tomography in Detecting Fractures of the Temporal Bones Correlated with Patterns of Fracture on High-Resolution Computed Tomography

고해상도 전산화 단층촬영에서 확인된 골절 유형에 따른 측두골 골절의 진단에서 뇌전산화 단층촬영의 유용성

  • Kwon, Bong-Seok (Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hyuk (Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Pil-Cho (Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Sang-Kuk (Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Hun (Department of Emergency Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University) ;
  • Song, Hyoung-Gon (Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 권봉석 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 신동혁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 최필조 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 한상국 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 이정훈 (동국대학교 일산병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 송형곤 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 응급의학과)
  • Received : 2010.06.07
  • Accepted : 2010.06.18
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical utility of brain computed tomography (CT) in detecting temporal bone fracture is not well established. We performed this study to determine the utility of brain computed tomography (CT) in detecting fractures of the temporal bones in correlation with fracture patterns. We used high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) as the gold standard for diagnosing temporal bone fracture and its pattern. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2009, patients who underwent both brain CT and HRCT within 10 days of head trauma were investigated. Among them, 58 cases of temporal bone fracture confirmed by HRCT were finally included. Fracture patterns (transverse or non-transverse, otic capsule sparing or otic capsule violating) were determined by HRCT. Brain CT findings in correlation with fracture patterns were analyzed. Results: Among 58 confirmed cases of temporal bone fracture by HRCT, 14 cases (24.1%) were not detected by brain CT. Brain CT showed a significantly lower ability to detect temporal bone fracture with transverse component than without transverse component (p=0.020). Moreover, brain CT showed lower ability to detect otic capsule violating pattern than otic capsule sparing pattern (p=0.015). Among the 14 cases of temporal bone fracture that were not detected by brain CT, 4 cases lacked any objective physical findings (facial palsy, hemotympanum, external auditory canal bleeding) suggesting fractures of the temporal bones. Conclusion: Brain CT showed poor ability to detect temporal bone fracture with transverse component and otic capsule violating pattern, which is associated with a poorer clinical outcome than otic capsule sparing pattern. Routine use of HRCT to identify temporal bone fracture is warranted, even in cases without evidence of temporal bone fracture on brain CT scans or any objective physical findings suggestive of temporal bone fracture.

Keywords

References

  1. Cannon CR, Jahrsdoerfer RA. Temporal bone fractures. Review of 90 cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109:285-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1983.00800190007002
  2. Dahiya R, Keller JD, Litofsky NS, et al. Temporal bone fractures: otic capsule sparing versus otic capsule violating clinical and radiographic considerations. J Trauma 1999;47:1079-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199912000-00014
  3. Lyos AT, Marsh MA, Jenkins HA, et al. Progressive hearing loss after transverse temporal bone fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:795-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1995.01890070081017
  4. Alvi A, Bereliani A. Acute intracranial complications of temporal bone trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;119:609-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70020-8
  5. Brodie HA, Thompson TC. Management of complications from 820 temporal bone fractures. Am J Otol 1997;18:188-97.
  6. Ghorayeb BY, Yeakley JW. Temporal bone fractures: longitudinal or oblique? The case for oblique temporal bone fractures. Laryngoscope 1992;102:129-34
  7. Mchugh HZ. The surgical treatment of facial paralysis and traumatic conductive deafness in fracture of the temporal bone. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1959;68:855-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348945906800320
  8. Ishman SL, Friedland DR. Temporal bone fractures: traditional classification and clinical relevance. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1734-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200410000-00011
  9. Kelly KE, Tami TA. Temporal bone and skull trauma. In: Jackler RK, Brackmann DE, editors. Neurotology. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 1994. p. 340-60.
  10. Little SC, Kesser BW. Radiographic classification of temporal bone fractures: clinical predictability using a new system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:1300-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.12.1300
  11. Exadaktylos AK, Sclabas GM, Nuyens M, et al. The clinical correlation of temporal bone fractures and spiral computed tomographic scan: a prospective and consecutive study at a level I trauma center. J Trauma 2003;55:704-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000038550.11890.A5
  12. Jeffrey B. Kahn, Michael G. Stewart, Pedro J. Diaz- Marchan. Acute Temporal Bone Trauma: Utility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography. Am J Otol 21:743-752, 2000.
  13. Sang-Yoo Park, Jong-Won Yang, Sung-Il Kim, et al. Clinical Study on the Reliable Temporal Bone Fracture Classification Scheme. Korean J Otolaryngol 2007;50:491-5.