DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block for Acute Cervical Disc Herniation

  • Eun, Sang-Soo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Won-Sok (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Bae, Sang-Jin (Department of Radiology, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Yeob (Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital)
  • Received : 2010.06.23
  • Accepted : 2010.11.26
  • Published : 2010.11.28

Abstract

Objective : To analyze the clinical outcomes of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided selective neve root block (SNRB) for severe arm pain caused by acute cervical disc herniation. Methods : The authors analyzed the data obtained from 25 consecutive patients who underwent CT fluoroscopy-guided SNRB for severe arm pain, i.e., a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 8 points or more, caused by acute soft cervical disc herniation. Patients with chronic arm pain, motor weakness, and/or hard disc herniation were excluded. Results : The series comprised 19 men and 6 women whose mean age was 48.1 years (range 35-72 years). The mean symptom duration was 17.5 days (range 4-56 days) and the treated level was at C5-6 in 13 patients, C6-7 in 9, and both C5-6 and C6-7 in 3. Twenty-three patients underwent SNRB in 1 session and 2 underwent the procedure in 2 sessions. No complications related to the procedures occurred. At a mean follow-up duration of 11.5 months (range 6-22 months), the mean VAS score and NDI significantly improved from 9 and 58.2 to 3.4 and 28.1, respectively. Eighteen out of 25 patients (72%) showed successful clinical results. Seven patients (28%) did not improve after the procedure, and 5 of these 7 underwent subsequent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Conclusion : CT fluoroscopy-guided SNRB may play a role as a primary conservative treatment for severe arm pain caused by acute cervical disc herniation.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker R, Dreyfuss P, Mercer S, Bogduk N : Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery : a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain 103 : 211-215, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00343-3
  2. Berger O, Dousset V, Delmer O, Pointillart V, Vital JM, Caillé JM : [Evaluation of the efficacy of foraminal infusions of corticosteroids guided by computed tomography in the treatment of radicular pain by foraminal injection]. J Radiol 80 : 917-925, 1999
  3. Bush K, Hillier S : Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with perineural/epidural corticosteroid injections : a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J 5 : 319-325, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304347
  4. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR : Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 2089-2092, 2003
  5. Cluff R, Mehio AK, Cohen SP, Chang Y, Sang CN, Stojanovic MP : The technical aspects of epidural steroid injections : a national survey. Anesth Analg 95 : 403-408, 2002
  6. Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux E, Sarrabere MP, Cottin A, Blotman F, et al. : Cervical radiculopathy : open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under CT control in 30 patients. Am J Neuroradiol 25 : 441-445, 2004
  7. Fessler RG, Khoo LT : Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy : an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery 51 (Suppl 2) : S37-S45, 2002
  8. Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O'Brien EM : Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 21-25, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00007
  9. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH : Radicul-opathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 519-528, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
  10. Karasek M, Bogduk N : Temporary neurologic deficit after cervical transforaminal injection of local anesthetic. Pain Med 5 : 202-205, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04028.x
  11. Kim H, Lee SH, Kim MH : Multislice CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal injection of steroids : technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 20 : 456-461, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318030d2bc
  12. Ma DJ, Gilula LA, Riew KD : Complications of fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks. An analysis of 1036 injections. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 1025-1030, 2005 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02139
  13. Razzaq AA, O'Brien D, Mathew B, Bartlett R, Taylor D : Efficacy and durability of fluoroscopically guided cervical nerve root block. Br J Neurosurg 21 : 365-369, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690701434634
  14. Rozin L, Rozin R, Koehler SA, Shakir A, Ladham S, Barmada M, et al. : Death during transforaminal epidural steroid nerve root block (C7) due to perforation of the left vertebral artery. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 24 : 351-355, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.paf.0000097790.45455.45
  15. Sasso RC, Macadaeg K, Nordmann D, Smith M : Selective nerve root injections can predict surgical outcome for lumbar and cervical radiculopathy : comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 : 471-478, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000146761.36658.45
  16. Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Jackson HB, Rogers DP, Vresilovic EJ : Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of atraumatic cervical spondylotic radicular pain : a retrospective analysis with independent clinical review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81 : 741-746, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90104-7
  17. Vernon H, Mior S : The Neck Disability Index : a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14 : 409-415, 1991

Cited by

  1. Repeat epidural steroid injections for radicular pain due to lumbar or cervical disc herniation : What Happens After ‘Salvage Treatment’? vol.b100, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b10.bjj-2018-0461.r1