Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지

On the design of instruments for integrating general educational technology course and educational technology in mathematics education course

교육공학 관련 교직과목과 교과교육 과목의 연계를 위한 도구

  • Cho, Han-Hyuk (Dept. of Math. Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Song, Min-Ho (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity)
  • Received : 2010.09.17
  • Accepted : 2010.11.09
  • Published : 2010.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To get an undergraduate degree from mathematics education department, a student not only take a general educational technology course from education department, but also take an educational technology in mathematics education course from mathematics education department. We believe that these two courses can be integrated for preparing better mathematics teachers. For this purpose, we design an educational technology tool called JavaMAL microworld, and study strategy to integrate two courses harmoniously. This kind of approach is good for internationalization of researches on mathematics education by Korean researchers since most SSCI journal prefer an integrated approach in the educational technology related papers. In short, integrating general educational technology course and educational technology in mathematics education course is not only good to student but to professors. But just integrating two courses is not enough. Students must understand the needs and the usefulness of educational technology tool in the learning and teaching of mathematics, and must have such experience from their mathematics courses.

사범대학 교직과목인 교육방법 및 교육공학 과목과 수학교육 과목인 수학교육과 교육공학(또는 컴퓨터와 수학교육)을 연계시켜 강의하는 방안을 제안한다. 현실적으로 예비교사들이 임용고사와 관련된 교직과목의 내용을 필수적으로 들어야하기에, 우리는 교육공학 관련 교직과목의 내용을 중심으로 수학교육과 교육공학을 실습으로 접목시키는 연계방안을 실시하였다. 우리는 이러한 연계 교육과 실습을 위해 먼저 웹 2.0 기반 교육공학 이론과 수학사 기반 수학실험을 위한 마이크로월드 수학실험실을 설계하였다. 또한 인터넷에 구축된 수학실험실을 기반으로 교육공학 관련 교직과목 이론과 수학교육공학 관련 교과교육 내용의 실습을 진행하며 두 과목의 연계를 시도하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김응태.박한식.우정호 (2007). 수학교육학개론, 서울대학교출판부.
  2. 교육부 (1998). 초등학교 교육과정 해설(IV), 서울: 대한교과서주식회사.
  3. Abelson, H., & diSessa, A. (1980). Turtle geometry. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  4. Ackermann, E. K. (2001). Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism: What's the difference, Future of learning group publication., MIT Media Lab, http://learning.media.mit.edu/publications.html
  5. Ackermann, E. K. (2004). Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In M. Tokoro and L. Steels(Eds.), A learning zone of one's own : Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments. Amsterdam : IOS Press.
  6. Bumer, J. (1996). 교육의 문화 (강현석, 이자현 역) 서울: 교육과학사.
  7. Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The Development of Spatial Skills Through Interventions Involving Block Building Activities, Cognition and Instruction 26, 269-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177177
  8. Cho, H., Han, H., Jin, M., Kim, H., & Song, M. (2004). Designing a microworld: activities and programs for gifted students and enhancing mathematical creativity, Proceedings of ICMET SG4, 110-120.
  9. Cho, H., Kim, H. & Song, M. (2006). The qualitative approach to the graphs of functions in a microworld, The SNU Journal of Education Research 15, 129-140.
  10. Cho, H., Kim, H., & Song, M. (2007). Mediating model between Logo and DGS for planar curves, PME Conference 2007.
  11. Clements, D. (1999). 'Concrete' manipulatives, concrete Ideas, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 1(1), 45-60.
  12. Eisenberg, M., & Nishioka, A. (1997). Orihedra: Mathematical Sculptures in paper, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 1, 225-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182617
  13. Ernest, P. (2010). Mathematics and Metaphor, An International Journal of Complexity and Education 7(1), 98-104
  14. Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Seeing, doing and expressing: An evaluation of task sequences for supporting algebraic thinking. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference 3, 67-74.
  15. Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2003). "What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education?" In Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 323-349
  16. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., & Hsu, R. L. (2006) Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving, Computers and Education 46(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.05.005
  17. Hwang, W. Y., Huang, J. H., & Dong, J. J. (2000). A Study of Multi-Representation of Geometry Problem Solving with Virtual Manipulatives and Whiteboard System, Educational Technology & Society 12(3), 229-247.
  18. Kaput J., Hoyles, C., & Noss R. (2002). Developing New Notations for a Learnable Mathematics in the Computational Era. In English, L. (Ed.) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 51-75
  19. Noss, R. (2001) For a Learnable Mathematics in the Digital Culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics 48, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015528224870
  20. Noss, R. & Hoyles, (1996) Windows on mathematical meaning, Springer-Verlag.
  21. Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms : children, computers, and powerful ideas. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Perseus Publishing.
  22. Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism, In I. Harel and S. Papert(Eds.), Constructionism, 1-12. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
  23. Presmeg, N. (2003). Creativity, mathematizing, and didactizing: Leen Streefland's work continues. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005255.04769.89
  24. Presmeg, N. (2006a). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics, In Angel Gutierrez and Paolo Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education : past, presentandfuture.
  25. Presmeg, N. (2006b). Semiotics and the "Connections" Standard: Significance of Semiotics for Teachers of Mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics 61, 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-3365-z
  26. Wilensky, U. (1991) Abstract mediations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education, In I. Harel and S. Papert(Eds.), Constructionism, 193-203. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
  27. Wilensky, U. (2003). Statistical Mechanics for Secondary School : The GasLab Multi-Agent Modeling Toolkit, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 8(1).
  28. Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (1991). Editors' Introduction: What is Mathematical Visualization? In Walter Zimmermann and Steve Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 1-7.