The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The assessment of dentoalveolar compensation in facial asymmetry individuals: integration of cone beam CT and laser scanned dental cast images

Cone beam CT 영상과 석고모형 레이저 스캔 영상의 결합을 이용한 안면비대칭자의 치성보상 평가

  • Song, Hyo-Kyung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Byung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Il (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 송효경 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 박수병 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 김성식 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 김용일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실)
  • Received : 2010.05.24
  • Accepted : 2010.10.04
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the dentoalveolar compensation in facial asymmetry individuals using an integration of a CBCT image and a laser scanned dental cast image. Methods: The subjects consisted of 30 adults with asymmetric mandibles and 20 adults with symmetric mandibles. The CBCT and laser scanned dental cast images were integrated with a registration technique. Canine and first molar position and angulation were assessed from reference coordinates. The differences between deviated and non-deviated sides were analyzed with the paired t-test. The differences shown according to menton deviation were also statistically analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. Results: The experimental group showed deviated and non-deviated side differences (dev.-ndev.) in the position and angle of the canine and first molars. Menton deviation showed positive correlation with the deviation side (dev.-ndev.) for the maxillary and mandibular 1st molar angles, negative correlation with the deviation side for the vertical position of the maxillary 1st molars, transverse position of the mandibular canine, transverse position and vertical position of the mesio-lingual cusp of the mandibular 1st molars. Conclusions: The upper and lower canine and first molars of facial asymmetry individuals were compensated, so the transverse position, vertical position, and angle showed differences between the deviated/non-deviated sides.

본 연구에서는 CBCT 영상파 석고모형 레이저 스캔 영상의 결합하여 안면비대칭자의 치성보상을 3차원적으로 계측하고 비교하였다. 안면비대칭자 30명과 정상교합자 20명을 대상으로 하여 CBCT 영상에서 두개악안면 골격에 대한 기준 좌표계를 설정하고 석고모형 레이저 스캔 영상에서 견치와 제1대구치의 3차원적 위치와 각도를 계측하여 그 차이(dev.-ndev.)를 구하였다. 두 집단을 비교 분석하고 이부 편위랑과의 상관 분석을 시행하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 안면비대칭군의 편위측 상악 견치는 비편위측에 비해 $2.73{\pm}4.07\;mm$ 협측에 위치하였고, 편위측 상악 제1대구치는 비편위 측에 비해 $3.83{\pm}0.12\;mm$ 협측에 위치하였으며, $8.26{\pm}6.82^{\circ}$ 협측 경사되어 있었다. 비편위측 상악 제1대구치의 협측교두는 편위측에 비해 $1.76{\pm}0.11\;mm$ 정출되어 있었다. 편위측 하악 제1대구치는 비편위측에 비해 $6.01{\pm}0.14\;mm$ 설측에 위치하였고, 비편위측에 비해 $8.31{\pm}7.07^{\circ}$ 설측경사되어 있었다 (p < 0.01). 안면비대칭자는 이부 펀위량이 증가할수록 상악 제1대구치는 비편위측에 비해 편위측에서 협측 경사가 증가하는 양상을 보였고, 하악 제1대구치는 편위측에서 설측 경사가 증가하는 양상을 보였다. 또한 상악 제1대구치의 모든 교두와 하악 제1대구치의 근심설측 교두의 수직적 위치는 비편위측에서 더 정출되는 경향을 보이며, 하악 견치와 제1대구치의 횡적 위치도 편위측에서 좀 더 설측으로 위치하는 양상을 보였다. 이상의 결과에서 안면비대칭군에서 편위측의 견치와 대구치가 비편위측에 비해 횡적으로 기울어져 있고, 수직적 위치 및 각도의 차이를 보임을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod 1976;46:1-25.
  2. Tani M, Iketani M, Watanabe M, Suda S, Fujimura N, Miyazawa M, et al. Posterior-anterior cephalometric analysis in patients with dentofacial deformities. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 1989;35:1749-59.
  3. Kim DW, Son WS. The relationship between facialasymmetry and maxillary dental arch shape. Korean J Orthod 1997;27:445-56.
  4. Sung JH, Son WS, Kim SS. The relationship between posterior dental compensation and skeletal discrepancy in class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2003;33:41-9.
  5. Fukushima K, Yasui K, Otsuka Y, Matsui S, Hirase N, Takayanagi J, et al. Morphological characteristics of patients with jaw deformities -frontal cephalometric evaluation of facial symmetry-. Meikai Univ Dent J 2003;32:118-23.
  6. Kusayama M, Motohashi N, Kuroda T. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:329-37. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.41
  7. Nojima K, Yokose T, Ishii T, Kobayashi M, Nishii Y. Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2007;48:171-6. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.48.171
  8. Park SB, Park JH, Jung YH, Jo BH, Kim YI. Correlation between menton deviation and dental compensation in facial asymmetry using cone-beam CT. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:300-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.5.300
  9. West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, Dawant BM, Maurer CR Jr, Kessler RM, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:554-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199707000-00007
  10. Sander G. The Graz hemisphere splint: a new precise, non-invasive method of replacing the dental arch of 3D-models by plaster models. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:169-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80008-5
  11. Terai H, Shimahara M, Sakinaka Y, Tajima S. Accuracy of integration of dental casts in three-dimensional models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:662-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90425-1
  12. Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50033
  13. Nkenke E, Zachow S, Benz M, Maier T, Veit K, Kramer M, et al. Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:226-32. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27071199
  14. Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:325-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm019
  15. Swennen GR, Barth EL, Eulzer C, Schutyser F. The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:146-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.019
  16. Swennen GR, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Lamoral P, Neyt N, et al. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:533-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e31805343df
  17. Swennen GR, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Lamoral P, Neyt N, et al. A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.11.006
  18. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F, et al. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:297-307. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181996803
  19. Choi JY, Song KG, Baek SH. Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:1306-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.009
  20. Park JW, Kim NG, Chang Yl. Formulation of a reference coordinate system of three-dimensional (3D) head and neck images: Part I. Reproducibility of 3D cephalometric landmarks. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:388-97.
  21. Kim GW, Kim JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Reproducibility of asymmetry measurements of mandible in three-dimensional CT imaging. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:314-27. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.5.314
  22. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  23. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:779-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021

Cited by

  1. Camouflage treatment for skeletal Class III patient with facial asymmetry using customized bracket based on CAD/CAM virtual orthodontic system: vol.90, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2319/102318-768.1