한국지반공학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society)

한국지반공학회 (Korean Geotechnical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

1g 진동대를 이용한 쇄석말뚝으로 개량된 연약점토 지반의 지진 응답 특성

Seismic Response of Stone Column-Improved Soft Clay Deposit by Using 1g Shaking Table

  • 김진만 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부 토목공학) ;
  • 이현진 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부 토목공학) ;
  • 류정호 (부산대학교 토목공학과)
  • 투고 : 2010.10.18
  • 심사 : 2010.11.16
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

해안매립지와 같은 연약한 점토지반에 시공된 쇄석말뚝의 내진성능 평가를 위해 1g 진동대 실험을 수행하였다. 개량전 후 지반의 동적응답특성을 비교하기 위해 가속도 증폭 및 시간에 따른 전단변형, 전단파 속도 등을 평가하였다. 실험 결과, 쇄석말뚝으로 개량된 지반의 전단변형은 개량되지 않은 지반에 비해 감소되는 경향을 보이나, 단주기 지진파에는 더 높은 수준의 지반 가속도 증폭이 발생되는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 쇄석말뚝으로 개량된 지반의 내진성능 향상여부는 모형실험과 함께 지반응답해석 등의 수행하여 평가되어야 한다고 판단된다.

A series of shaking table tests were conducted to estimate the seismic performance of soft ground deposits improved by stone column. The amplification of acceleration, shear strain, and shear wave velocity were evaluated to compare the seismic response of unimproved ground deposits with that of improved ground deposits. From the test results, it was shown that the stone column can prevent large shear deformation in ground deposits. However, it was also found that the acceleration of improved ground deposits may be amplified more than that of unimproved ground deposits when it was subjected to short periodic seismic wave. The results suggest that it is necessary to perform the ground response analysis with model experiments for both unimproved and improved ground deposits to evaluate the effect of stone column on the seismic performance of improved ground deposits.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김진만, 류정호 (2008), "층 분할된 연성전단상자의 경계효과에 관한 수치해석적 분석", 한국지반공학회논문집, pp.35-41.
  2. 박창호, 이동근 (1992), "주파수영역에서의 가속도 기록 보정", 대한토목학회논문집, pp.71-79
  3. 한국지반공학회 (2010), 상호검증시험(Round Robin Test)을 통한 지진 지반응답해석 이해, (사) 한국지반공학회, pp.149-152.
  4. 흥왕선 (1999), 가속도 측정치의 신호처리에 의한 교량의 변위응답 산정, 석사학위논문, 건국대학교, pp.9-17.
  5. Aalier, K., EIgamal, A., Meneses, J., and Baez, I.J. (2003), "Stone columns as liquefaction counter-measure in non-plastic silty soils", Joumal of Soil Dynamics d Earthquake Engineering, Vol.23, No.7, pp.571-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00070-8
  6. Baez, J.I., and Martin, G.R. (1995), "Permeability and shear wave velocity of vibro-replacement stonc columns", Soil Improvement for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 49, pp.66-81.
  7. Boulanger, R., Idriss, I., Stewart, D., Hashash, Y., and Schmidt, B. (1998), "Drainage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction", Proc., Geotech. Eanhquake Eng. and Soil Dynamics III. ASCE Geotech Special Publ., Vol.1, No. 75, pp. 678-690.
  8. Dickenson, S. (1994), Dynamic Response of soft and Deep Cohesive Soils During the Loma Prieta Earthquake of October 17, 1989, Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Califomia, Berkeley
  9. FHWA. (1983), Design and Construction of Stone Column, FHWA/ RD-83/026, Federal Highway Administration Office of Engineering and Highway Operations Research and Development Washington, D.C. 20590.
  10. Greenwood, D.A. (1970), "Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surface", Proc. ground eng. conf.
  11. lai, S. (1989), "Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field", Soils and Foundations, Vol. 29(1), pp.105-118. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.105
  12. Ishihara, K., and Yamazaki, F. (1980), "Cyclic simple shear tests on saturated sand in multi-directional loading", Soils and Foundations, Vol.20, No.1, pp.49-59.
  13. Meymand P. J. (1998), Shaking Table Tests of Nonlinear Soil-pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay, A Thesis for the Degree of the Doctor of Philosophy at University of California, Berkeley.
  14. Mitchell, J.K., and Wentz, F.J. (1991), Performance of improved ground during the Loma Prieta Earthquake, University of Califomia, Berkerley UBC/EERC Report, 91/12.
  15. Priebe, H.J. (1989), "The Prevention of liquefaction by vibro-replacement", Proc., Earthquake Resistance Construction and Design, Berlin, Germany.
  16. Priebe, H.J. (1991), "Vibro-replaccment: design criteria and quality cntrol", In: Esrig, Bachus (Eds.), Deep Foundation Improvements: Design, Construction, and Testing, ASTM STP 1089, pp.62-72.
  17. Priebe, H.J. (1998), "Vibro replacement to prevent earthquake induced liquefaction", Ground Engineering, UK.
  18. Seed, H.B., and Booker, J.R. (1977), "Stabilization of potentially liquefiable sand deposits using graveI drains", ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.103, No.7, pp.757-768.
  19. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhli, R., and Seed, H. B. (1988), Dynamamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils, University of California, Berkerley UBC/EERC Report, 88/15.
  20. Tokimatsu, K., and Yoshimi, Y. (1980), "Effects of vertical drains on the bearing capacity of saturated sand during earthquakes", Proc., International Conference on Engineering for Protection from Natural Disasters, Bangkok, Thailand, pp.643-655.
  21. Vucetic, M.V., and Dobry, R. (1991), "Effect of soiI plasticity on cyclic response", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.117, pp.89-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)