Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the surface microstructure and roughness of hydroxyapatite-coated implant

  • Kim, Seong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Chung, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Il (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2010.08.29
  • Accepted : 2010.11.03
  • Published : 2011.01.11
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation on the change of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implant surface microstructure according to the laser energy and the application time. Methods: The implant surface was irradiated by Er:YAG laser under combination condition using the laser energy of 100 mJ/pulse, 140 mJ/pulse and 180 mJ/pulse and application time of 1 minute, 1.5 minutes and 2 minutes. The specimens were examined by surface roughness evaluation and scanning electron microscopic observation. Results: In scanning electron microscope, HA-coated implant surface was not altered by Er:YAG laser irradiation under experimental condition on 100 mJ/pulse, 1 minute. Local areas with surface melting and cracks were founded on 100 mJ/pulse, 1.5 minutes and 2 minutes. One hundred forty mJ/pulse and 180 mJ/pulse group had surface melting and peeling area of HA particles, which condition was more severe depending on the increase of application time. Under all experimental condition, the difference of surface roughness value on implant surface was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser on HA-coated implant surface is recommended to be irradiated below 100 mJ/pulse, 1 minute for detoxification of implant surface without surface alteration.

Keywords

References

  1. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:667-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01120.x
  2. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  3. Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang NP. Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988;3:113-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1988.tb00095.x
  4. Becker W, Becker BE, Newman MG, Nyman S. Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:31-8.
  5. Apse P, Ellen RP, Overall CM, Zarb GA. Microbiota and crevicular fluid collagenase activity in the osseointegrated dental implant sulcus: a comparison of sites in edentulous and partially edentulous patients. J Periodontal Res 1989; 24:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1989.tb00863.x
  6. Quaranta A, Maida C, Scrascia A, Campus G, Quaranta M. Er:Yag Laser application on titanium implant surfaces contaminated by Porphyromonas gingivalis: an histomorphometric evaluation. Minerva Stomatol 2009;58:317-30.
  7. Baier RE, Meyer AE. Implant surface preparation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:9-20.
  8. Sennerby L, Lekholm U. The soft tissue response to titanium abutments retrieved from humans and reimplanted in rats. A light microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:23-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040103.x
  9. Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implants: a review. J Periodontol 1992;63:859-70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  10. Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM. Detoxification of endotoxin-contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatitecoated surfaces utilizing various chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities. Implant Dent 1992;1:154-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199205000-00009
  11. Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 1990;61:485-90. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.485
  12. Matarasso S, Quaremba G, Coraggio F, Vaia E, Cafiero C, Lang NP. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070108.x
  13. Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1998;69:857-64. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.857
  14. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Christoffers AB, Gotz H, Jansen B, Duschner H, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er : YAG laser and an air powder system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:36-43.
  15. Van de Velde E, Thielens P, Schautteet H, Vanclooster R. Subcutaneous emphysema of the oral floor during cleaning of a bridge fixed on an IMZ implant. Case report. Rev Belge Med Dent 1991;46:64-71.
  16. Mouhyi J, Sennerby L, Pireaux JJ, Dourov N, Nammour S, Van Reck J. An XPS and SEM evaluation of six chemical and physical techniques for cleaning of contaminated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090306.x
  17. Krozer A, Hall J, Ericsson I. Chemical treatment of machined titanium surfaces. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:204-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100303.x
  18. Romanos GE, Everts H, Nentwig GH. Effects of diode and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on titanium discs: a scanning electron microscope examination. J Periodontol 2000;71: 810-5. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.810
  19. Kreisler M, Gotz H, Duschner H. Effect of Nd:YAG, Ho:YAG, Er:YAG, $CO_{2}$, and GaAIAs laser irradiation on surface properties of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:202-11.
  20. Schwarz F, Sculean A, Berakdar M, Szathmari L, Georg T, Becker J. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study. Lasers Surg Med 2003;32:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10179
  21. Tucker D, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Killoy WJ. Morphologic changes following in vitro $CO_{2}$ laser treatment of calculus- ladened root surfaces. Lasers Surg Med 1996;18:150-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:2<150::AID-LSM4>3.0.CO;2-R
  22. Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Schauer P, Doertbudak O, Wernisch J, et al. Treatment of periodontal pockets with a diode laser. Lasers Surg Med 1998;22:302-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)22:5<302::AID-LSM7>3.0.CO;2-T
  23. Bach G, Neckel C, Mall C, Krekeler G. Conventional versus laser-assisted therapy of periimplantitis: a five-year comparative study. Implant Dent 2000;9:247-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009030-00010
  24. Ando Y, Aoki A, Watanabe H, Ishikawa I. Bactericidal effect of erbium YAG laser on periodontopathic bacteria. Lasers Surg Med 1996;19:190-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:2<190::AID-LSM11>3.0.CO;2-B
  25. Friedmann A, Antic L, Bernimoulin JP, Purucker P. In vitro attachment of osteoblasts on contaminated rough titanium surfaces treated by Er:YAG laser. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:53-60.
  26. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Sculean A, Georg T, Scherbaum W, Becker J. Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:784-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00954.x
  27. Kreisler M, Al Haj H, d'Hoedt B. Temperature changes at the implant-bone interface during simulated surface decontamination with an Er:YAG laser. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:582-7.
  28. Porras R, Anderson GB, Caffesse R, Narendran S, Trejo PM. Clinical response to 2 different therapeutic regimens to treat peri-implant mucositis. J Periodontol 2002;73:1118-25. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1118
  29. Rimondini L, Cicognani Simoncini F, Carrassi A. Micromorphometric assessment of titanium plasma-sprayed coating removal using burs for the treatment of peri-implant disease. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:129-38. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.110205.x
  30. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Marinello C, Gotz H, Duschner H, Jansen B, et al. Bactericidal effect of the Er:YAG laser on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 2002;73:1292-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.11.1292
  31. Geesink RG, de Groot K, Klein CP. Bonding of bone to apatite- coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:17-22.
  32. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-43.
  33. Cook SD. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:235-8.
  34. Artzi Z, Carmeli G, Kozlovsky A. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite- coated implants in 5-10 years in function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:85-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01178.x
  35. Folwaczny M, Thiele L, Mehl A, Hickel R. The effect of working tip angulation on root substance removal using Er:YAG laser radiation: an in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:220-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028003220.x
  36. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9
  37. Burkes EJ Jr, Hoke J, Gomes E, Wolbarsht M. Wet versus dry enamel ablation by Er:YAG laser. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:847-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90599-6
  38. Visuri SR, Walsh JT Jr, Wigdor HA. Erbium laser ablation of dental hard tissue: effect of water cooling. Lasers Surg Med 1996;18:294-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<294::AID-LSM11>3.0.CO;2-6
  39. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-44.
  40. Dong SP, Mainsah E, Sullivan PJ, Stout KJ. Instruments and measurement techniques of 3-dimensional surface topography. In: Stout KJ, Dong WP, editors. Three dimensional surface topography: measurement, interpretation, and applications: a survey and bibliography. London: Penton Press; 1994. p. 3-63.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of the Effects of Different Laser Wavelengths on Implants Surfaces vol.3, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1030
  2. Ankyloglossia: The Diagnostic Dilemma vol.3, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1031
  3. Interdisciplinary Approach using Diode Laser for Esthetic Management of Missing Anterior Teeth vol.3, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1032
  4. Treatment of Pyogenic Granuloma using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser vol.3, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1033
  5. Laser-assisted Pink Esthetic Management for an Orthodontic Patient vol.3, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1034
  6. Biocompatibility of erbium chromium-doped yattrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG 2780 nm) laser-treated titanium alloy used for dental applications (in vitro study) vol.2, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-018-0029-0
  7. Antibacterial effect of Er:YAG laser in the treatment of peri-implantitis and their effect on implant surfaces: a literature review vol.2, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-018-0043-2
  8. Effects of Lasers and Their Delivery Characteristics on Machined and Micro-Roughened Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces vol.7, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7030093
  9. Effects of Diode, CO2, Er : YAG, and Er and Cr : YSGG on Titanium Implant Surfaces by Scanning Electron Microscopy vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3551097