The Impacts of the Number of Suppliers on Inventory Management in a Make-to-order Manufacturer

공급업체 수가 주문 생산 제조 기업의 재고 관리에 미치는 영향 분석

  • Kim, Eun-Gab (College of Business Administration, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김은갑 (이화여자대학교 경영대학)
  • Received : 2010.08.24
  • Accepted : 2010.10.09
  • Published : 2010.12.01

Abstract

We consider a supply chain consisting of a make-to-order manufacturer and N component suppliers and study the impacts of the number of suppliers on component inventory management. The manufacturer has full information and continuously observes the state of both component inventory level and customer backorders. Based on this information, the manufacturer determines whether or not to place a component purchasing order to a supplier among N suppliers even though some orders are in process by other suppliers. The goal of this paper is to numerically identify the manufacturer's purchasing policy which minimizes the total supply chain cost and the best choice of N. Our model contributes to the current literature in that the problem of simultaneously considering multiple outstanding orders and incorporating order setup cost into the model has not been covered yet. From numerical experiment, we investigate how much the policy with N suppliers can contribute to reducing the supply cost compared to the policy with a single supplier.

Keywords

References

  1. Archibald, B. C. (1981), Continuous review (s, S) policies with lost sales, Management Science, 27, 1171-1177. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.10.1171
  2. Beckmann, M. and Srinivasan, S. K. (1987), An (s, S) inventory system with Poisson demands and exponential lead time, OR Spectrum, 9, 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01719831
  3. Berman, O. and Kim, E. (1999), Stochastic models for inventory management at service facilities, Communications in Statistics- Stochastic Model, 15, 695-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349908807558
  4. Buchanan, D. J. and Love, R. F. (1985), A (Q, R) inventory model with lost sales and Erlang-distributed lead times, Naval Research Logistics, 32, 605-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800320407
  5. Carr, S. and Duenyas, I. (2000), Optimal Admission Control and Sequencing in a Make-To-Stock/Make-To-Order purchasing System, Operations Research, 48, 709-720. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.5.709.12401
  6. He, Q. and Jewkes, E. M. (2000), Performance measure of a make-to-order inventory-purchasing system, IIE Transactions, 32, 409-419.
  7. He, Q., Jewkes, E. M., and Buzacott, J. (2002), Optimal and near-optimal inventory control policies for a make-to-order inventory-purchasing system, European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00257-0
  8. Kim, E. (2005), Optimal inventory production policy for a queueing system with finite waiting room capacity, European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2002.12.001
  9. Mohebbi, E. and Posner, M. J. (1998), A continuous-review inventory system with lost sales and variable lead time, Naval Research Logistics, 45, 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199804)45:3<259::AID-NAV2>3.0.CO;2-6
  10. Morton, T. E. (1971), The near-myopic nature of the lagged-proportional-cost inventory problem with lost sales, Operations Research, 19, 1708-1716. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.19.7.1708
  11. Nahmias, S. (1979), Simple approximations for a variety of dynamic lead time lost-sales inventory models, Operations Research, 27, 904-924. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.27.5.904
  12. Puterman, M. (2005), Markov Decision Processes, John Wiley and Sons.
  13. Hill, R. M. and Johansen, S. G. (2006), Optimal and near-optimal policies for lost sales inventory models with at most one replenishment order outstanding, European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.022
  14. Van Donselaar, K., de Kok, T., and Rutten, W. (1996), Two replenishment strategies for the lost sales inventory model : A comparison, International Journal of Production Economics, 46, 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00066-6