DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability of Self-Reported Information by Farmers on Pesticide Use

일부 농업인에서 자기 기입식 농약 노출 설문에 대한 신뢰도 연구

  • Lee, Yo-Han (Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cha, Eun-Shil (Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Eun-Kyeong (Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kong, Kyoung-Ae (Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Chronic Disease Surveillance) ;
  • Koh, Sang-Baek (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yun-Keun (Wonjin Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health) ;
  • Lee, Won-Jin (Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 이요한 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 차은실 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 문은경 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 공경애 (질병관리본부 만성병조사과) ;
  • 고상백 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이윤근 (원진노동환경건강연구소) ;
  • 이원진 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2010.07.12
  • Accepted : 2010.10.07
  • Published : 2010.11.30

Abstract

Objectives: Exposure assessment is a major challenge faced by studies that evaluate the association between pesticide exposure and adverse health outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability of information that farmers self-report regarding their pesticide use. Methods: Twenty five items based upon existing questionnaires were designed to focus on pesticide exposure. In 2009, a selfadministrated survey was conducted on two occasions four weeks apart among 205 farmers residing in Gyeonggi and Gangwon provinces. For a reliability measure, we calculated the percentage agreement, the kappa statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two reports according to the characteristics of the subjects. Results: Agreement for ever-never use of any pesticide was 96.4% (kappa 0.61). For both 'years used' and 'age at the first use' of overall pesticides, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.88 and, 0.78, respectively), whereas those of 'days used' and 'hours used' were relatively low (ICC: 0.42 and, 0.66, respectively). The kappa value for the use of personal protective equipment ranged from 0.46 to 0.59, and hygiene activities came out at 0.19 to 0.37. The agreement for individual pesticide use ranged widely and there was relatively low agreement due to the low response rates. The reliability scores did not significantly vary according to gender, age, the education level, the types of crop or the years of farming. Conclusions: Our results support that carefully designed, self-reported information on ever-never pesticide use among farmers is reliable. However, the reliability of data on individual pesticide exposure may be unstable due to low response rates and needs to be refined.

Keywords

References

  1. Sanborn M, Cole D, Kerr K, Vakil C, Sanin LH, Bassil K. Pesticides Literature Review. Toronto: The Ontario College of Family Physicians; 2004.
  2. World Health Organization. Public Health Impact of Pesticides Used in Agriculture. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.
  3. Lee WJ, Cha ES. Overview of pesticide poisoning in South Korea. J Rural Med 2009; 4(2): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.4.53
  4. Rural Development Administration. Farmer's Health and Agricultural Work Behavior. Suwon: Rural Development Administration 2008; 11-1390039-000196-01. (Korean)
  5. Cha ES, Kong KA, Moon EK, Lee WJ. Prevalence and changes in chronic diseases among South Korean farmers: 1998 to 2005. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 268. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-268
  6. Sull JW, Yi SW, Sohn TY, Jee SH, Nam CM, Ohrr H. Pesticides and cancer incidence: The Kangwha Cohort Study. Korean J Prev Med 2002; 35(1): 24-32.
  7. Lee WJ, Son M, Chun BC, Park ES, Lee HK, Coble J, et al. Cancer mortality and farming in South Korea: an ecologic study. Cancer Causes Control 2008; 19(5): 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9112-2
  8. Fenske RA. State-of-the-art measurement of agricultural pesticide exposures. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005; 31(Suppl 1): 67-73.
  9. Maroni M, Colosio C, Ferioli A, Fait A. Biological Monitoring of Pesticide Exposure: a review. Introduction. Toxicology 2000; 143(1): 1-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(99)00163-8
  10. Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. Health effects of chronic pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity. Annu Rev Public Health 2004; 25: 155-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123020
  11. Dosemeci M, Alavanja MC, Rowland AS, Mage D, Zahm SH, Rothman N, et al. A quantitative approach for estimating exposure to pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study. Ann Occup Hyg 2002; 46(2): 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mef011
  12. Blair A, Tarone R, Sandler D, Lynch CF, Rowland A, Wintersteen W, et al. Reliability of reporting on life-style and agricultural factors by a sample of participants in the Agricultural Health Study from Iowa. Epidemiology 2002; 13(1): 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200201000-00015
  13. Valcke M, Chaverri F, Monge P, Bravo V, Mergler D, Partanen T, et al. Pesticide prioritization for a case-control study on childhood leukemia in Costa Rica: a simple stepwise approach. Environ Res 2005; 97(3): 335-347.
  14. Gunier RB, Harnly ME, Reynolds P, Hertz A, Von Behren J. Agricultural pesticide use in California: pesticide prioritization, use densities, and population distributions for a childhood cancer study. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109(10): 1071-1078. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.011091071
  15. StataCorp. Stata Reference Manual Release 10. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2007.
  16. Duell EJ, Millikan RC, Savitz DA, Schell MJ, Newman B, Tse CJ, et al. Reproducibility of reported farming activities and pesticide use among breast cancer cases and controls. A comparison of two modes of data collection. Ann Epidemiol 2001; 11(3): 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00208-8
  17. Wang FL, Semchuk KM, Love EJ. Reliability of environmental and occupational exposure data provided by surrogate respondents in a case-control study of Parkinson's disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(7): 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90177-5
  18. Fortes C, Mastroeni S, Boffetta P, Salvatori V, Melo N, Bolli S, et al. Reliability of self-reported household pesticide use. Eur J Cancer Prev 2009; 18(5): 404-406. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832caab5
  19. Bruce KA, Emily W, Rodolfo S. Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 78-114
  20. Stephen BH, Steven RC, Warren SB, Deborah GG, Thomas BN. Designing Clinical Research, 3rded. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Co.; 2007. p. 242.
  21. Aday LA, Cornelius LJ. Designing And Conducting Health Surveys, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Co.; 2006. P. 110
  22. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey 2005 Summary Report. [cited 2010 July 2]. Available from: http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/Index.aspx.
  23. Hoppin JA, Yucel F, Dosemeci M, Sandler DP. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2002; 12(5): 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500232
  24. Engel LS, Seixas NS, Keifer MC, Longstreth WT Jr, Checkoway H. Validity study of self-reported pesticide exposure among orchardists. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001; 11(5): 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500176
  25. Coble J, Arbuckle T, Lee W, Alvanja M, Dosemeci M. The validation of a pesticide exposure algorithm using biological monitoring results. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005; 2(3): 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620590923343

Cited by

  1. 일부 농업인에서의 농약 중독증상과 농약 사용정보에 대한 예비조사 vol.37, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5668/jehs.2011.37.1.022
  2. 농약 노출과 건강 vol.37, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5668/jehs.2011.37.2.081
  3. 경기 일부지역 농업인의 급성농약중독 증상 유병률 및 직업성 위험요인 vol.40, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5393/jamch.2015.40.4.228
  4. 국내 주요 역학 연구에서 사용된 설문지의 직업적, 환경적 노출 문항 비교 vol.42, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5668/jehs.2016.42.2.71