Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Groundwater Recharge between HELP Model and SWAT Model

HELP 모형과 SWAT 모형의 지하수 함양량 비교

  • 이도훈 (경희대학교 공과대학 토목공학과) ;
  • 김남원 (한국건설기술연구원) ;
  • 정일문 (한국건설기술연구원)
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The groundwater recharge was assessed by using both SWAT and HELP models in Bocheong-cheon watershed. The SWAT model is a comprehensive surface and subsurface model, but it lacks the physical basis for simulating a soil water percolation process. The HELP model which has a drawback in simulating subsurface lateral flow and groundwater flow component can simulate soil water percolation process by considering the unsaturated flow effect of soil layers. The SWAT model has been successfully applied for estimating groundwater recharge in a number of watersheds in Korea, while the application of HELP model has been very limited. The subsurface lateral flow parameter was proposed in order to consider the subsurface lateral flow effect in HELP model and the groundwater recharge was simulated by the modified exponential decay weighting function in HELP model. The simulation results indicate that the recharge of HELP model significantly depends on the values of lateral flow parameter. The recharge errors between SWAT and HELP are the smallest when the lateral flow parameter is about 0.6 and the recharge rates between two models are shown to be reasonably comparable for daily, monthly, and yearly time scales. The HELP model is useful for estimating groundwater recharge at watershed scale because the model structure and input parameters of HELP model are simpler than that of SWAT model. The accuracy of assessing the groundwater recharge might be improved by the concurrent application of SWAT model and HELP model.

본 연구에서는 SWAT 모형과 HELP 모형을 이용하여 보청천 유역의 지하수 함양량을 산정하였다. SWAT 모형은 지표수 및 지하수 성분을 모두 고려할 수 있는 물순환 모형이지만, 토양층에 대한 침루과정의 물리적 해석이 미흡하다. 반면에 HELP 모형은 중간유출 및 지하수 유출성분을 모의하지 못하지만, 토양층에서의 비포화흐름을 고려하여 침루과정을 해석할 수 있다. 국내유역에서 함양량 산정을 위해 SWAT 모형은 여러 유역에서 성공적으로 적용되어 왔지만, HELP 모형의 국내유역에 대한 적용은 매우 미흡하였다. HELP 모형의 적용을 위하여 중간유출계수를 제안하였고, 수정된 지수형감쇠 가중함수를 이용하여 지하수 함양량을 산정하였다. HELP 모형의 함양량은 중간유출계수 값에 따라서 많은 차이를 나타내었다. 중간유출계수 값이 0.6인 경우에 HELP 모형과 SWAT 모형사이의 함양량 오차가 가장 작았으며 일, 월, 연단위 등 다양한 시간규모에 대하여 두 모형사이의 함양량은 비교적 잘 일치하였다. HELP 모형은 SWAT모형에 비하여 모형구조가 비교적 간단하고 입력변수가 적게 요구되므로 지하수 함양량 산정에 유용하게 적용될 수 있으며, SWAT 모형과 HELP 모형을 병행하여 적용하면 지하수 함양량 산정의 신뢰도가 향상될 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김남원, 정일문, 원유승(2005). “시공간적 변동성을 고려한 지하수 함양량의 추정방안.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 38(7), pp. 517-526.
  2. 김남원, 정일문, 원유승, 이정우, 이병주 (2006). “시공간적 변동성을 고려한 무심천 유역의 지하수 함양량 추정.” 지하수토양환경, 한국지하수토양환경학회, 11(5), pp. 9-19.
  3. 김성준, 채효석(2000). “격자기반의 토양수분추적에 의한 지하수 함양량 추정기법 개발.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 33(1), pp. 61-72.
  4. 김철겸, 김현준, 장철희, 임상준 (2007). “MIKE SHE 모형을 이용한 경안천 유역의 지하수 함양량 산정.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 40(6), pp. 459-468. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2007.40.6.459
  5. 배상근 (2002). “지하수 함양량 산정방법에 대한 고찰.” 한국수자원학회지, 한국수자원학회, 35(3), pp. 50-59.
  6. 이도훈 (2006). “LH-OAT 민감도 분석과 SCE-UA 최적화 방법을 이용한 SWAT 모형의 자동보정.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 39(8), pp. 677-690. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.8.677
  7. Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., and Bernhardt, G. (1993). “Acomprehensive surface-groundwater flow model.”Journal of Hydrology, ELSEVIER, 142, pp. 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
  8. Arnold, J.G., Muttiah, R.S., Srinivasan, R., and Allen,P.M. (2000). “Regional stimation of base flow andgroundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi riverbasin.” Journal of Hydrology, ELSEVIER, 227, pp.21-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00139-0
  9. Brooks, R.H., and Corey, A.T. (1964). “Hydraulic propertiesof porous media.” Hydrology Paper No. 3,Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
  10. Campbell, G.S. (1974). “A simple method for determiningunsaturated hydraulic conductivity frommoisture retention data.” Soil Science, LippincottWilliams & Wilkins, 117(6), pp. 311-314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197406000-00001
  11. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.K. (1992).“Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptualrainfall-runoff models.” Water ResourcesResearch, AGU, 28(4), pp. 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985
  12. Eckhardt, K., and Arnold, J.G. (2001). “Automatic calibrationof a distributed catchment model.” Journalof Hydrology, ELSEVIER, 251, pp. 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00429-2
  13. Gogolev, M.I. (2002). “Assessing groundwater rechargewith two unsaturated zone modeling technologies.”Environmental Geology, Springer, 42, pp. 248-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0494-7
  14. Jyrkama, M.I., Sykes, J.F., and Normani, S.D. (2002).“Recharge estimation for transient ground watermodeling.” Ground Water, NGWA, 40(6), pp. 638-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02550.x
  15. Jyrkama, M.I., and Sykes, J.F. (2007). “The impact ofclimate change on spatially varying groundwaterrecharge in the grand river watershed (Ontario).”Journal of Hydrology, ELSEVIER, 338, pp. 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.036
  16. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., and Williams,J.R. (2001). Soil and Water Assessment Tool Version2000. Agricultural Research Service, Texas AgriculturalExperiment Station, Temple, Texas.
  17. Risser, D.W., Gburek, W.J., and Folmar, G.J. (2005).Comparison of methods for estimating ground-waterrecharge and base flow at a small watershed underlainby fractured bedrock in the eastern UnitedStates. Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5038,US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
  18. Saxton, K.E., Rawls, W.J., Romberger, J.S., andPapendick, R.I. (1986). “Estimating generalized soilwatercharacteristics from texture.” Soil ScienceSociety of America Journal, SSSA, 55, pp. 1031-1036.
  19. Scanlon, B.R., Healy, R.W., and Cook, P.G. (2002).“Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifyinggroundwater recharge.” Hydrogeology Journal,Springer, 10(1), pp. 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0176-2
  20. Schroeder, P.R., Dozier, T.S., Zappi, P.A., McEnroe,B.M., Sjostrom, J.W., Peyton, R.L. (1994). The hydrologicevaluation of landfill performance (HELP)model: Engineering Documentation for version 3.EPA/600/R-94/168b, U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency Office of Research and Development,Washington, DC.
  21. Sun, H., and Cornish, P.S. (2005). “Estimating shallowgroundwater recharge in the headwaters of theLiverpool Plains using SWAT.” Hydrological Processes,WILEY, 19, pp. 795-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5617