한국전자파학회논문지 (The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science)

  • 제21권10호
  • /
  • Pages.1161-1168
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1226-3133(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-226X(eISSN)
한국전자파학회 (The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Jamming 환경에서 SFH 변조 방식에 따른 위성 통신 시스템의 BER 성능 분석

An Analysis on BER Performance of Satellite Communication System Classified by SFH-Modulation Method under Jamming

  • 발행 : 2010.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

FHSS(Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum) 방식은 군 통신 시스템에서 재밍(Jamming)에 의한 간섭을 줄이기 위해 사용된다. 하지만 사용되는 변조 방식의 종류, 재밍 신호의 특성에 따른 위성 통신 시스템의 BER 성능이 무선 채널 상태에 따라 어떤 성능 차이를 보이는지 분석되지 않았다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 PBNJ(Partial-Band Noise Jamming)와 WPBJ(Worst case Partial-Band noise Jamming)의 두 가지 재밍 환경에서 NC-MFSK(Non-Coherent M-ary Frequeency-Shift Keying), SDPSK(Symmetric Differential Phase-Shift Keying), GMSK (Gaussian filtered Minimum-Shift Keying)의 세 가지 변조 방식에 따른 위성 통신 시스템의 BER 성능 변화를 분석한다. 또한, 분석된 결과를 이용하여 전송 환경에 따른 최적의 전송 방식을 제안하도록 한다.

The FHSS(Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum), in which a transmitter changes its carrier frequency according to a certain hopping pattern, is widely used in the military communication system, since it is highly resistant to deliberate Jamming. However, the difference of BER performance of satellite communication system which using the different modulation scheme and Jamming model was not studied. Thus, in this paper, we consider PBNJ(Partial-Band Noise Jamming) and WPBJ(Worst case Partial-Band noise Jamming) as Jamming models, and evaluate BER(Bit Error Rate) performances of NC-MFSK(Non-Coherent M-ary Frequency-Shift Keying), SDPSK(Symmetric Differential Phase-Shift Keying), and GMSK(Gaussian filtered Minimum-Shift Keying) modulation schemes. Based on the results, we suggest the best transmission method for each condition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. K. Simon, J. K. Omura, R. A. Scholtz, and B. K. Levitt, Spread Spectrum Communications Handbook, pp. 475-480, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.
  2. S. W. Houston, "Modulation techniques for communication, Part I: Tone and noise Jamming performance of spread spectrum M-ary FSK and 2, 4-ary DPSK waveforms", Proc. IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference(NAECON '75), Dayton, Ohio pp. 51-58, Jun. 1975.
  3. J. S. Lee, R. H. French, and L. E. Miller, "Probability of error analyses of a BFSK frequency hopping system with diversity under partial-band Jamming interference-Part I: Performance of square- law linear combining soft decision receiver", Proc. IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. COM-32, pp. 645-653, no. 6, Jun. 1984. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1984.1096128
  4. R. L. Peterson, R. E. Ziemer, and D. E. Borth, Spread Spectrum Communications, pp. 68-75, 337-350, Prentice Hall, 1995.
  5. J. S. Lee, L. E. Miller, "Probability of error analyses of a differential phase shift keyed/frequency hopping spread spectrum communication system in the partial-band Jamming environments", Proc. IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. COM-30, no. 5, pp. 943-952, May 1982. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1982.1095538