Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Values and Design Elements in Eco-friendly Fashion Using an In-depth Interview

심층면접법을 이용한 친환경패션의 가치와 디자인요소 분석

  • Received : 2010.10.05
  • Accepted : 2010.10.12
  • Published : 2010.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Excessive consumption, pollution, and am expanding global population are seen as very important issues that must be solved through reusable materials and the reduction of energy consumption. This study examines the values and design elements such as line, color, and textures in eco-friendly fashion that could contribute to the product development of an eco-friendly brand. The following methods of analysis were used in this study. An in-depth interview (where the interviewer records the response of interviewers to questions) was used to grasp the diverse design properties of products that customers need or want and the recorded interviews were documented by computer using open coding. The results show that the personal, economic, and social value of eco-friendly fashion has increased, in addition to the environmental value. The needs and preference of customers for eco-friendly fashion design were diversified and the consumer consciousness was more advanced than the consciousness of experts. This shows that it is not enough to consider the effect on the environment. In conclusion, understanding the personal, environmental, economic, and social value from the viewpoint of customers, finding the optimal design factors, and reflecting them in the development of products are necessary for advanced eco-friendly fashion.

Keywords

References

  1. 김문숙, 최나영. (1998). 환경친화적 섬유제품에 관한 연구.복식문화연구, 6(1), 121-135.
  2. 김수현, 이재정, 정현숙. (2007). 오가닉 코튼을 이용한 지속가능한 패션디자인. 복식, 57(2), 115-131.
  3. 김태호, 홍정표, 양종열, 이유리, 오민권, 이건표. (2001). 글로벌 디자인 프로세스 구축. 디자인학연구지, 통권 제42호,14(2), 107-116.
  4. 남미경. (2007). 지속가능한 디자인을 위한 디자이너들의 다양한 관점 분석. 한국디자인문화학회지, 13(1), 87-95.
  5. 문수란, 정성황, 양종열. (2004). 수단-가치 사슬이론에 의한 청국장 디자인개발 연구. 한국디자인학회 추계학술대회논문집, 160-161.
  6. 박옥미. (2005). 로하스현상이 반영된 현대섬유소재의 특성. 한국디자인문화학회지, 11(3), 50-55.
  7. 베스트, 캐서린. (2006). 디자인 매니지먼트. 정경원, 남기영옮김 (2008). 파주: 럭스미디어.
  8. 송석정, 최영백, 김상현. (2005). 웰빙문화와 섬유 관련 상품의 동향. 고분자과학과 기술, 16(5), 613-618.
  9. 양종열. (2001). 컨셉테스팅에서 제품디자인 선호에 대한 디자인요소들의 영향. 디자인학연구지, 14(3), 69-76.
  10. 오한진, 이지영, 김무곤, 이기훈. (2009). 단백질 자원을 이용한 친환경소재 및 섬유개발. 섬유기술과 산업, 13(1), 39-48.
  11. 이은영. (2003). 복식디자인론. 서울: 교문사.
  12. 장남경. (2008). 친환경패션에 대한 소비자 라이프스타일과태도. 한국패션디자인학회지, 8(1), 31-47.
  13. 전종찬. (2004). 제품디자인에 나타난 에코디자인 경향에 대한 연구. 한국기초조형학회지, 5(1), 263-271.
  14. 정기석. (1998). 기업 경영에 있어 환경 친화적 디자인 전략수립에 관한 연구. 디자인과학연구지, 1, 15-27.
  15. 조동환. (2009). 저탄소 녹색자원: 천연섬유. 섬유기술과 산업, 13(1), 3-12.
  16. 최나영, 김문숙. (2000). 그린 패션제품에 대한 소비자의 인지도와 행위적 특성분석. 복식, 50(1), 145-159.
  17. 친환경 섬유 시대 막 올랐다. (2008, 9. 29). 어패럴뉴스. pp.34-36.
  18. 파파넥, 빅터. (1995). 녹색위기: 디자인과 건축의 생태성과윤리. 조영식 옮김 (1998). 서울: 조형교육.
  19. 하승연. (2009). 친환경패션에 나타난 가치와 디자인요소. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  20. 하승연, 박재옥. (2009). 친환경디자인의 개념정립에 따른 가치 분석-선행연구의 내용분석을 중심으로-. 복식, 59(9),146-162.
  21. Brower, C., & Mallory, O. Z. (2005). Experimental eco design. Switzerland: Rotovision SA.
  22. Charter, M., & Tischner, U. (Ed.) (2001). Sustainable solutions: Developing products and services for the future. London: Greenleaf.
  23. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. (3th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
  24. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Davis, M. L. (1996). Visual Design in Dress (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall College.
  26. Dobers, P., & Strannegard, L. (2005). Design, lifestyles and sustainability. Aesthetic consumption in a world of abundance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.495
  27. Eco-friendly Fabrics. (2007, October 31). Samsungdesign.net. Retrieved August 10, 2008, from http://www.samsungdesign. net/Report/IndustryTrend/Textile/list.asp?an=95
  28. Fabric: Recycled Polyester. (2010). Patagonia.com. Retrieved 2010, October 1, from http://www.patagonia.com/us/patagonia. go?assetid=2791
  29. Masui, K, Sakao T, Kobayashi, M., & Inaba, A. (2003). Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310453836
  30. Merchand, A., & Walker, S. (2008). Product development and responsible consumption: designing alternative for sustainable lifestyle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1163-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.012
  31. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2002). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  32. Shigenobu, K. (1990). Color image scale. New York: Kodansha America, INC.
  33. Sustainable Clothing. (2007, February 9). Samsungdesign.net. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from http://www.samsungdesign. net/Report/IndustryTrend/TrendView/list.asp?an=101
  34. Sustainable Clothing II. (2007, April. 10). Samsungdesign.net. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from http://www.samsungdesign. net/Report/IndustryTrend/TrendView/list.asp?an=103
  35. Walker, S. (2000). The attraction of opposites: Reconciling fashion with sustainable product design. Benchmarking Personal Success, Innovation Summer, 46-51.

Cited by

  1. Physical Properties and Objective Hand Values of Recycled Polyester Knit Fabrics vol.49, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12772/TSE.2012.49.2.098
  2. Perceived Value Dimensions of Up-cycling Fashion Goods and the Relationship with Attitude and Purchase Intention - The Moderating Effect of Fashion Innovativeness - vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.257
  3. Content planning for a ubiquitous wardrobe - Application of an RFID database - vol.22, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.2.313
  4. Tendency of Consumption and Safety Certification for Infant's Organic Cotton Apparel vol.39, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.6.924
  5. Perceived Consumption Value, Pro-Environmental Belief, Attitude, eWOM, and Purchase Intention Toward Upcycling Fashion Products vol.20, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2018.20.2.177