DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental evaluation of pumpjet propulsor for an axisymmetric body in wind tunnel

  • Published : 2010.03.30

Abstract

Design of a Pump Jet Propulsor (PJP) was undertaken for an underwater body with axisymmetric configuration using axial/low compressor design techniques supported by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis for performance prediction. Experimental evaluation of the PJP was earned out through experiments in a Wind Tunnel Facility (WTF) using momentum defect principle for propulsive performance prior to proceeding with extensive experimental evaluation in towing tank and cavitation tunnel. Experiments were particularly conducted with respect to Self Propulsion Point (SPP), residual torque and thrust characteristics over a range of vehicle advance ratio in order to ascertain whether sufficient thrust is developed at the design condition with least possible imbalance torque left out due to residual swirl in the slip stream. Pumpjet and body models were developed for the propulsion tests using Aluminum alloy forged material. Tests were conducted from 0 m/s to 30 m/s at four rotational speeds of the PJP. SPP was determined confirming the thrust development capability of PJP. Estimation of residual torque was carried out at SPP corresponding to speeds of 15, 20 and 25 m/s to examine the effectiveness of the stator. Estimation of thrust and residual torque was also carried out at wind speeds 0 and 6 m/s for PJP RPMs corresponding to self propulsion tests to study the propulsion characteristics during the launch of the vehicle m water where advance ratios are close to Zero. These results are essential to assess the thrust performance at very low advance ratios to accelerate the body and to control the body during initial stages. This technique has turned out to be very useful and economical method for quick assessment of overall performance of the propulsor and generation of exhaustive fluid dynamic data to validate CFD techniques employed.

Keywords

References

  1. Wislicenus, G. F., 1960. Hydrodynamics and propulsion of submerge bodies. J. Am. Rocket Soc. 30(12), pp. 1140-1148.
  2. Thurston, S. and Ansler, R.C., 1966. Review of marine propellers and ducted propeller propulsive devices. J. Aircraft, 3(3). pp. 255-261. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43735
  3. Thunston, S. and Evanbar, M.S., 1965. Efficiency of propulsor on body of revolution including boundary layer fluid. Journal of Aircraft, 3, pp. 270-277. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43737
  4. Henderson R.E. McMahon J.F. and Wislicenus G.F., 1964. A method for design of pumpjets. ORL Report No. 63-0209-0-7, Pennsylvania State University, 15 May 1964.
  5. Vosper P.L. and Brown A.J., 1996. Pumpjet propulsion - a British splendid achievement. J. Naval Engineering, 36(2),
  6. McCormick, B.W. Eisenhuth, J.J. and Lynn, J.E., 1956. A Study of torpedo propellers–Part I. Ordnance Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, Report NOrd. 16597-5.
  7. Markatos, N.C., 1984. The Computation of thick axisymmetric boundary layers and wakes around bodies of revolution. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 198(4), pp. 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1984_198_087_02
  8. McCormick, B.W. and Eisenhuth, J.J., 1956. A Study of torpedo propellers–Part II. Ordnance Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, Report NOrd. 16597-13.
  9. Wislicenus, G.F., 1965. Fluid mechanics of turbo-machinery. Volume I and II, Dover Publication, New York, USA.
  10. Stefan Ivanell, 2001. Hydrodynamic simulation of a torpedo with pumpjet propulsion system. Masters thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  11. Suryanarayana, Ch., 1999. Design Development and Testing of Pumpjet Propulsor. NSTL Report No. NSTL/SR/136, Visakhapatnam, India.
  12. Das, H.N. Jayakumar, P. and Saji, V.F., 2006. CFD examination of interaction of flow on high-speed submerged body with pumpjet propulsor. 5th Int. Conference on High Performance Marine Vehicles, Australia , 8-10 November 2006.
  13. Suryanarayana, Ch., 2004. Advanced propulsors for high speed marine vehicles. Technological challenges and developments pursued at naval science and technological laboratory, Visakhapatnam, National Science Day, NSTL, Visakhapatnam, India, 2004.
  14. Suryanarayana, Ch., 2003. Innovative CAM techniques for propeller manufacture. 3rd International Conference on Navy and Ship Building Nowadays (NSN2003), St Petursburg, Russia, 26-28 June 2003.
  15. Keshi, H. Maharana, S.N. and Suryanarayana, Ch., 2002. Design philosophy of contrarotating propellers. International Conference on Ship and Ocean Technology, SHOT-2002, IIT, Kharagpur, India, December 2002.
  16. Suryanarayana, Ch. Reddy, K.P. Mathi, S. Swamy, P.V., and Suresh R.V., 2006. Hydrodynamic design of propulsor, profile and hovering system for an expendable decoy. International Conference in Marine Hydrodynamics 2006, NSTL, Visakhapatnam, India
  17. Suryanarayana, Ch. Roy, S.P. and Sateesh Kumar, M., 2006. Hydrodynamic performance evaluation of an underwater body by model testing in cavitation tunnel. International Conference in Marine Hydrodynamics 2006, NSTL, Visakhapatnam, India

Cited by

  1. Numerical investigation of a pump-jet with ring rotor using an unstructured mesh technique vol.29, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0619-7