DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Remote-Controlled Experiment with Integrated Verification of Learning Outcome

  • Staudt, Volker (Dept. of Electrical Eng. and Information Technology, Ruhr-University Bochum) ;
  • Menzner, Stefan (Dept. of Electrical Eng. and Information Technology, Ruhr-University Bochum) ;
  • Baue, Pavol (Dept. of Electrical Sustainable Energy, Delft University of Technology)
  • Received : 2010.05.17
  • Published : 2010.11.20

Abstract

Experiments in electrical engineering should mirror the key components of successful research and development: Understand the basic theory needed, test the resulting concepts by simulation and verify these, finally, in the experiment. For optimal learning outcome continuous monitoring of the progress of each individual student is necessary, immediately repeating those subjects which have not been learned successfully. Classically, this is the task of the teacher. In case of remote-controlled experiments this monitoring process and the repetition of subjects should be automated for optimal learning outcome. This paper describes a remote-controlled experiment combining theory, simulation and the experiment itself with an automated monitoring process. Only the evaluation of the experimental results and their comparison to the simulation results has to be checked by a teacher. This paper describes the details of the educational structure for a remote-controlled experiment introducing active filtering of harmonics. For better understanding the content of the learning material (theory and simulation) as well as the results of the experiment and the underlying booking system are shortly presented.

Keywords

References

  1. P. Bauer, D. Maga, J. Sitar, J. Dudak, R. Hartansky, "PEMCWebLab - Distance practical education for power electronics and electrical drives," 38th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference Power Electronics Education Workshop (PEEW07), 2007.
  2. P. Bauer, V. Staudt, "Remote controlled practical education for Power Electronics," 12th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, 2007.
  3. P. Bauer, V. Hajek, V. Staudt, A. Steimel, "Power quality and active filters as web-controlled experiment in the frame of PEMC WebLab," EPE-PEMC 2008, S.2402 – 2408, 2008.
  4. M. Sonnenschein, M. Weinhold, "Comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain control schemes for shunt active filters," ETEP, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.5–16, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.4450090101
  5. M. Sonnenschein, M. Weinhold, R. Zurowski, "Shunt-Connected Power Conditioner for Improvement of Power Quality in Distribution Networks," 7th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP VII), pp. 27-32, 1996.
  6. M. Depenbrock, V. Staudt, "The FBD-Method as tool for compensating total non-active currents," 8th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP VIII), pp.320 – 324, Oct. 1998.
  7. www.caspoc.com; www.simulation-research.com

Cited by

  1. Design of a Comprehensive Pressure Vessel Experimental Device pp.1572-834X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5100-8