Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microbial Exposure Assessment in Sawmill, Livestock Feed Industry, and Metal Working Fluids Handling Industry

  • Park, Hyun-Hee (Work Environment Research Department, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Park, Hae-Dong (Work Environment Research Department, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Lee, In-Seop (Work Environment Research Department, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
  • Received : 2010.05.13
  • Accepted : 2010.09.25
  • Published : 2010.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the distribution patterns and exposure concentrations of bioaerosols in industries suspected to have high levels of bioaerosol exposure. Methods: We selected 11 plants including 3 livestock feed plants (LF industry), 3 metal working fluids handling plants (MWFs industry), and 5 sawmills and measured total airborne bacteria, fungi, endotoxins, as well as dust. Airborne bacteria and fungi were measured with one stage impactor, six stage cascade impactor, and gelatin filters. Endotoxins were measured with polycarbonate filters. Results: The geometric means (GM) of the airborne concentrations of bacteria, fungi, and endotoxins were 1,864, $2,252\;CFU/m^3$, and $31.5\;EU/m^3$, respectively at the sawmills, followed by the LF industry (535, $585\;CFU/m^3$, and $22.0\;EU/m^3$) and MWFs industry (258, $331\;CFU/m^3$, and $8.7\;EU/m^3$). These concentrations by industry type were significantly statistically different (p < 0.01). The ratio of indoor to outdoor concentration was 6.2, 1.9, 3.2, and 3.2 for bacteria, fungi, endotoxins, and dust in the LF industry, 5.0, 0.9, 2.3, and 12.5 in the MWFs industry, and 3.7, 4.1, 3.3, and 9.7 in sawmills. The respiratory fractions of bioaerosols were differentiated by bioaerosol types and industry types: the respiratory fraction of bacteria in the LF industry, MWF industry, and sawmills was 59.4%, 72.0%, and 57.7%, respectively, and that of fungi was 77.3%, 89.5%, and 83.7% in the same order. Conclusion: We found that bioaerosol concentration was the highest in sawmills, followed by LF industry facilities and MWFs industry facilities. The indoor/outdoor ratio of microorganisms was larger than 1 and respiratory fraction of microorganisms was more than 50% of the total microorganism concentrations which might penetrate respiratory tract easily. All these findings suggest that bioaerosol in the surveyed industries should be controlled to prevent worker respiratory diseases.

Keywords

References

  1. Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D. Bioaerosol healtheffects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. AnnOccup Hyg 2003;47:187-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meg032
  2. Alwis KU, Mandryk J, Hocking AD. Exposure to biohazardsin wood dust: bacteria, fungi, endotoxins, and $(1{\to}3)-beta-D-glucans$.Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1999;14:598-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/104732299302404
  3. Douwes J, Wouters I, Dubbeld H, van Zwieten L, SteerenbergP, Doekes G, Heederik D. Upper airway inflammation assessed by nasal lavage in compost workers: A relation withbio-aerosol exposure. Am J Ind Med 2000;37:459-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200005)37:5<459::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-J
  4. Robertson AS, Weir DC, Burge PS. Occupational asthma dueto oil mists. Thorax 1988;43:200-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.43.3.200
  5. Kennedy SM, Greaves IA, Kriebel D, Eisen EA, Smith TJ,Woskie SR. Acute pulmonary responses among automobileworkers exposed to aerosols of machining fluids. Am J IndMed 1989;15:627-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700150603
  6. Rongo LM, Msamanga GI, Burstyn I, Barten F, DolmansWM, Heederik D. Exposure to wood dust and endotoxin insmall-scale wood industries in Tanzania. J Expo Anal EnvironEpidemiol 2004;14:544-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500375
  7. Duchaine C, Meriaux A, Thorne PS, Cormier Y. Assessmentof particulates and bioaerosols in eastern Canadian sawmills.AIHAJ 2000;61:727-32. https://doi.org/10.1202/0002-8894(2000)061<0727:AOPABI>2.0.CO;2
  8. Kim KY, Kim HT, Kim D, Nakajima J, Higuchi T. Distribution characteristics of airborne bacteria and fungi in the feedstuff-manufacturing factories. J Hazard Mater 2009;169:1054-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.059
  9. Oh SO, Kim KO, Lee WG, Lee YS, Joung HC. Environmentalassessment of oilmist, endotoxins and microbes in a machiningplants. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2004;14:41-7.
  10. Lee SW, Ko DH, Chin KW, Park DU, Lee JT, Song YH, LeeSY. A case of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a worker exposedto metal working fluid. Korean J Occup Environ Med2008;20:37-45.
  11. Kim KY, Kim CN. Airborne microbiological characteristics inpublic buildings of Korea. Build Environ 2007;42:2188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.013
  12. Kim YS. Size distributions and respirable mass fraction ofexposed dust in work environment. J Environ Sci 1992;12:25-31.
  13. Li CS, Kuo YM. Airborne characterization of fungi indoorsand outdoors. J Aerosol Sci 1992;23:667-70.

Cited by

  1. Levels of the fungal allergen Asp f 1 in dust from two sawmills in Croatia: a pilot study vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-013-9317-z
  2. Indoor fungi: companions and contaminants vol.25, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12182