Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan

  • Horie, Seichi (Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health)
  • Received : 2010.08.06
  • Accepted : 2010.08.27
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Industrial Safety and Health Law (ISH Law) of Japan requires abnormalities identified in evaluations of worker health and working environments are reported to occupational physicians, and employers are advised of measures to ensure appropriate accommodations in working environments and work procedures. Since the 1980s, notions of a risk assessment and occupational safety and health management system were expected to further prevent industrial accidents. In 2005, ISH Law stipulated workplace risk assessment using the wording "employers shall endeavor." Following the amendment, multiple documents and guidelines for risk assessment for different work procedures were developed. They require ISH Laws to be implemented fully and workplaces to plan and execute measures to reduce risks, ranking them from those addressing potential hazards to those requiring workers to wear protective articles. A governmental survey in 2005 found the performance of risk assessment was 20.4% and common reasons for not implementing risk assessments were lack of adequate personnel or knowledge. ISH Law specifies criminal penalties for both individuals and organizations. Moreover, under the Labor Contract Law promulgated in 2007, employers are obliged to make reasonable efforts to ensure employee health for foreseeable and avoidable risks. Therefore, enterprises neglecting even the non-binding provisions of guidelines are likely to suffer significant business impact if judged to be responsible for industrial accidents or occupational disease. To promote risk assessment, we must strengthen technical, financial, and physical support from public-service organizations, encourage the dissemination of good practices to reduce risks, and consider additional employer incentives, including relaxed mandatory regulations.

Keywords

References

  1. Horie S. Status and future tasks of OHS in Japan. Int CongrSer 2006;1294:61-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.01.012
  2. Molyneux MK, Wilson HG. An organized approach tothe control of hazards to health at work. Ann Occup Hyg1990;34:177-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/34.2.177
  3. Raworth P. Regional harmonization of occupational healthrules: the European example. Am J Law Med 1995;21:7-44.
  4. Russell RM, Maidment SC, Brooke I, Topping MD. Anintroduction to a UK scheme to help small firms controlhealth risks from chemicals. Ann Occup Hyg 1998;42:367-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(98)00056-8
  5. Money CD. European experiences in the development ofapproaches for the successful control of workplace healthrisks. Ann Occup Hyg 2003;47:533-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meg061
  6. Combes R, Dandrea J, Balls M. A critical assessment of theEuropean Commission's proposals for the risk assessment andregistration of chemical substances in the European Union.Altern Lab Anim 2003;31:353-64.
  7. Rogers MD. The European Commission's White Paper"strategy for a future chemicals policy": a review. Risk Anal2003;23:381-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00317
  8. JISHA OSHMS Standards certification [Internet]. Tokyo:Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association. 2006 – [cited2010 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.jisha.or.jp/english/oshms/ index.html.
  9. Construction occupational health and safety managementsystems (COHSMS) [Internet]. Tokyo: Japan ConstructionOccupational Safety and Health Association. c2007 - [cited2010 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.kensaibou.or.jp/english/cohsms/index.html.
  10. Result of the voluntary inspections on industrial safety andhealth organization at large workplaces [Internet]. Tokyo:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2004 - [cited2010 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2004/02/tp0217-1.html.
  11. Basic survey on industrial safety and health [Internet]. Tokyo:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2006 - [cited 2010Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/itiran/roudou/saigai/anzen/05/index.html.
  12. Kondo M. New developments in the occupational safetyand health management system. J UOEH 2004;26:369-79.Japanese. https://doi.org/10.7888/juoeh.26.369
  13. List of documents on risk assessments [Internet]. Tokyo:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. c2010 - [cited 2010Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/roudoukijun/anzeneisei14/index.html.
  14. Support system for implementing risk assessment [Internet].Tokyo: Japan Advanced Information Center of Safety andHealth. c2010 - [cited 2010 Jul 31]. Available from: http://wwwanzen.jaish.gr.jp/risk/risk_index.html.
  15. Karasawa M. The domestic and international status andfuture development of OSHMS as well as the safety ofmachines, etc. Occup Health Rev 2005;18:51-69. Japanese.
  16. Miyagawa M. Globally harmonized system of classificationand labelling of chemicals on management of chemicalsubstances. Occup Health Rev 2005;18:153-87. Japanese.
  17. Sakurai H. Risk management in the field of occupationalhealth. Occup Health J 2009;32:14-9. Japanese.
  18. Zalk DM, Nelson DI. History and evolution of controlbanding: a review. J Occup Environ Hyg 2008;5:330-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620801997916
  19. Bracker AL, Morse TF, Simcox NJ. Training health andsafety committees to use control banding: lessons learned andopportunities for the United States. J Occup Environ Hyg2009;6:307-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620902810083
  20. Jones RM, Nicas M. Margins of safety provided by COSHHEssentials and the ILO Chemical Control Toolkit. Ann OccupHyg 2006;50:149-56.
  21. Hashimoto H, Goto T, Nakachi N, Suzuki H, Takebayashi T,Kajiki S, Mori K. Evaluation of the control banding method:comparison with measurement-based comprehensive riskassessment. J Occup Health 2007;49:482-92. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.49.482
  22. Mori K, Takebayashi T. The introduction of an occupationalhealth management system for solving issues in occupationalhealth activities in Japan. Ind Health 2002;40:167-74. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.40.167
  23. Muto T, Takata T. Financial assistance in promotingoccupational health services for small-scale enterprises inJapan. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2001;14:143-50.
  24. Higashi T. Study on a model for future occupational health:proposal for an occupational health service model in Japan.Ind Health 2006;44:541-55. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.44.541

Cited by

  1. The Journal of Occupational Health from 1959 to 2016 vol.58, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-2001-ED
  2. Multi-stage downscaling procedure to analyse the impact of exposure concentration in a factory on a specific worker through computational fluid dynamics modelling vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16677331