Study on the Effects of the Recovery Time, Diameter of Canine Oocytes on In Vitro Fertilization and ICSI

  • Park, Ji-Hoon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Rhee, Man-Hee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Keun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2010.09.10
  • Accepted : 2010.09.17
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

These study was carried out to investigate the effects of the recovery time, diameter of oocytes on in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The in vitro maturation rates to MII stage of oocytes recovered at the inactive, follicular and luteal stages matured for 72 h were $1.4{\pm}0.0%$, $43.4{\pm}3.2%$ and $10.8{\pm}2.7%$, respectively. The fertilization rates of in vitro cultured oocytes recovered from ovaries at the in active, follicular and luteal stages were $0.0{\pm}0.0%$, $15.7{\pm}3.4%$ and $7.6{\pm}3.5%$, respectively. The in vitro maturation rate of oocytes recovered from ovaries at the follicular stage of the reproductive cycle was significantly higher than those at the inactive and luteal stages (p<0.05). The penetration rate determined that the percentages of oocytes with diameters in the < $100\;{\mu}m$, 100 to $100\;{\mu}m$ and 110 to $120\;{\mu}m$ ranges were $17.5{\pm}4.7%$, $43.9{\pm}4.5%$, $21.3{\pm}3.4%$, respectively. The penetration rate of oocytes with diameters between 100 to $100\;{\mu}m$ was significantly higher than that of oocytes whose diameters were < $100\;{\mu}m$ and $110{\sim}120\;{\mu}m$ (p<0.05). The penetration rate of oocytes determined that the percentages of ovaries with diameters between 1 to 5 mm and 6 to 10 mm were $32.9{\pm}3.2%$ and $17.5{\pm}3.7%$, respectively. Thus, the diameters of the ovaries were significantly higher at 1 to 5 mm (p<0.05). A total of 264 oocytes were fixed and stained after co-incubation with sperm, of which 72 had identifiable nuclear material. After in vitro fertilization for 20 hrs, 27.3% of oocytes were penetrated by spermatozoas. Oocytes were fixed and stained after ICSI, of which 38 oocytes contained identifiable nuclear material. After in vitro fertilization and ICSI for 20 hrs, to 27.3% and 67.9% of oocytes were penetrated by spermatozoas. The in vitro fertilization rates by ICSI was significantly higher than that in vitro fertilization method (p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Bedford SJ, Kurokawa M, Hinrichs K, Fissore RA (2003): Intracellular calcium oscillations and activation in horse oocytes injected with stallion sperm extracts or spermatozoa. Reproduction 126:489-499. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1260489
  2. Bolamba D, Borden-Russ KD, Durrant BS (1998): In vitro maturation of domestic dog oocytes cultured in advanced preantral and early antral follicles. Theriogenology 49:933-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00042-9
  3. Gomez MC, Pope E, Harris R, Mikota S, Dresser BL (2003): Development of in vitro matured, in vitro fertilized domestic cat embryos following cryopreservation, culture and transfer. Theriogenology 60:239-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00004-9
  4. Hansel W (2003): The potential for improving the growth and development of cultured farm animal oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 79:191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00165-9
  5. Hay MA, King WA, Gartley CJ, Leibo SP, Goodrowe KL (1997): Effects of cooling, freezing and glycerol on penetration of oocytes by spermatozoa in dogs. J Reprod Fertil 51:99-108.
  6. Hewitt DA, England GCW (1997): Effect of preovulatory endocrine events upon maturation of oocytes of domestic bitches. J Reprod Fertil (Supp) 151:83-91.
  7. Hewitt DA, England GCW (1999): Synthetic oviductal fluid and oviductal cell coculture for canine oocytes maturation in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 55(1):63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00162-6
  8. Holst PA, Phemister RD (1971): The prenatal development of the dog: Preimplantation events. Biol Reprod 5:194-206.
  9. Lee Bk, Kim SK (2006): Studies on the IVM/IVF rates of in vitro cultured canine oocytes. Korean J of Emb Trans 21(1):7-11.
  10. Otoi T, Murakami M Fujii M, Tanaka M, Ooka A, Une S, Suzuki T (2000): Development of canine oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. Vet Rec 146:52-53. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.2.52
  11. Otoi T, Shin T, Kraemer D, Westhusin ME (2004): Influence of maturation culture period on the development of canine oocytes after in vitro maturation and fertilization. Reprod Nutr Dev 44:631-637. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2004065
  12. Otoi T, Shimizu R, Naoi H, Wongsrikeao P, Agung B, Taniguchi M (2005): Meiotic competence of canine oocytes embedded in collagen gel. Reprod Domest Anim 41:17-21.
  13. Reyes M De, Carrion R, Barros C (2006): In vitro fertilization of in vitro matured canine oocytes using frozen-othawed dog semen. Theriogenology 66:1682-1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.002
  14. Rodrigues BA, Carboneiro dos Santos L, Rodrigues JL (2004): Embryonic development of in vitro matured and in vitro fertilized dog oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 67:215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10394
  15. Tsutsui T (1975): Studies on the reproduction in the dog. V. On cleavage and transport of fertilized ova in the oviduct. Jpn J Anim Reprod 21:70-75. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd1955.21.70
  16. Songsasen N, Yu I, Leibo SP (2002): Nuclear maturation of canine oocytes cultured in protein-free media. Mol Reprod Dev 62:407-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10130
  17. Songsasen N, Wildt DE (2005): Size of the donor follicle, but not stage of reproductive cycle or seasonality, influences meiotic competency of selected domestic dog oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 72:113-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20330
  18. Tsutsui T (1975): Studies on the reproduction in the dog. V. On cleavage and transport of fertilized ova in the oviduct. Jpn J Anim Reprod 21:70-75. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd1955.21.70
  19. Yamada S, Shimazu Y, Kawaji H, Nakazawa M, Naito K, Toyoda Y (1992): Maturation, fertilization, and development of dog oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 46:853-858. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.5.853