Forensic STR Analysis of Mixed Chimerism after Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • Eom, Yong-Bin (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Korea Nazarene University)
  • Received : 2010.07.12
  • Accepted : 2010.08.25
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Multiplex PCR-based short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is considered as a good tool for monitoring bone marrow engraftment after sex-mismatched allogeneic transplantation and provides a sensitive and accurate assessment of the contribution of both donor and/or recipient cells in post-transplantation specimens. Forensic STR analysis and quantitative real time PCR are used to determine the proportion of donor versus recipient each contained within the total DNA. The STR markers were co-amplified in a single reaction by using commercial $PowerPlex^{(R)}$ 16 system and $AmpFISTR^{(R)}$ $Identifiler^{(R)}$ / $Yfiler^{(R)}$ PCR amplification kits. Separation of the PCR products and fluorescence detection were performed by ABI $PRIS^{(R)}$ 3100 Genetic Analyzer with capillary electrophoresis. The $GeneMapper^{TM}$ ID software were used for size calling and analysis of STR profiles. Extracted DNA was quantified by the $Quantifiler^{TM}$ Human DNA / Y Human Male DNA Quantification Kit The intent of this study was to analyze the ratio of donor versus recipient cells in the post-transplant peripheral blood, spleen, lung and kidney specimens. Specimens were taken from the traffic accident male victim who had been engrafted from bone marrow female donor. Blood and spleen specimens displayed female donor DNA profile. Kidney specimen showed male recipient DNA profile. Interestingly, lung tissue showed mixed profiles. The findings of this study indicate that the forensic STR analysis using fluorescence labeling PCR combined with capillary electrophoresis is quick and reliable enough to assess the ratio of donor versus recipient cells and to monitor the mixed chimeric patterns.

Keywords

References

  1. Bader P, Holle W, Klingebiel T. Quantitative assessment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism by polymerase chain reaction after allogeneic BMT. Anticancer Res. 1996. 16: 1759-1763.
  2. Beutler E, Lichtman MA, Coller BS, Kipps TJ. Williams Hematology. 5th ed. 1995. pp. 172-194. New York, McGraw-Hill, Co.
  3. Cecilia M, Karina M, Eugenia A, Andrea B, Alejandra L, Nidia M. A case of chimerism in a paternity study. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics Supplement Series. 2009. 2: 228-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.09.037
  4. Durnam DM, Anders KR, Fisher L. Analysis of the origin of marrow cells in bone marrow transplant recipients using a Y -chromosome-specific in situ hybridization assay. Blood 1989. 74: 2220-2226.
  5. Eom YB. Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA Samples for Forensic DNA Typing. J Exp Biomed Sci. 2009. 15: 229-232.
  6. Lawler M, Humphries P, McCann SR. Evaluation of mixed chimerism by in vitro amplification of dinucleotide repeat sequences using the polymerase chain reaction. Blood 1991. 77: 2504-2514.
  7. Leclair B, Fregeau CJ, Aye MT, Fourney RM. DNA typing for bone marrow engraftment follow-up after allogeneic transplant: a comparative study of current technologies. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995. 16: 43-55.
  8. McCann SR, Lawler M. Mixed chimerism; detection and significance following BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993. 112: 91-94.
  9. Thiede C, Florek M, Bornhauser M, Ritter M, Mohr B, Brendel C, Ehninger G, Neubauer A Rapid quantification of mixed chimerism using multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat markers and fluorescence detection. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999. 23: 1055-1060. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701779
  10. Wessman M, Ruutu T, Volin L, Knuutila S. In situ hybridization using a Y-specific probe -a sensitive method for distinguishing residual male recipient cells from female donor cells in bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1989.4: 283-286.