Effect of Culture Condition on Hanwoo Embryonic Developments and Their Sunrival after Vitrification

배양 조건에 따른 한우 수정란의 발달과 초자화 동결 후 수정란의 생존성 비교

  • Cho, Sang-Rae (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Sun-Ho (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choe, Chang-Yong (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Son, Jun-Kyu (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Poong-Yeon (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Yeoung-Kyu (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jong (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Yeon, Sung-Heum (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Son, Dong-Soo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 조상래 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 최선호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 최창용 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 손준규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 이풍연 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 고응규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 김현종 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 연성흠 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 손동수 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장)
  • Received : 2010.08.19
  • Accepted : 2010.08.27
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

We investigated the cleavage rate and blastocyst yield for each culture condition to enhance tolerance of cryo-preservation of bovine IVF embryo with relatively lower cryo-tolerance compared to in vivo embryo. The cleavage rate and blastocysts yield for CR1aa, IVMD, IVD, CR1aa+10% FBS were 73.2, 69.3, 72.8, 68.5% and 44.1, 30.8, 33.3, 48.0%, respectively. The values did not differ among each treatments without serum. For embryo vitrification, In vivo and In vitro blastocysts were exposed to VS1(10% glycerin, 0.1 M glucose, 0.1 M sucrose, PEG 1%) for 5 min, and VS2 (10% glycerin, 10% EG, 0.2 M glucose, 0.2 M sucrose, PEG 2%) for 5 min and then VS3 (10% glycerin, 30% EG, 0.3 M glucose, 0.3 M sucrose, PEG 3%) for 1 min. The exposed embryos were then loaded into the 0.25 ml plastic straws and then plunged into liquid nitrogen. The straws were held for period of 1 to 2 weeks before thawing. In embryo viability, no differences in blastocyst re-expansion rates were found between in vivo and in vitro embryos. whereas expansion-BL rates was significantly higher for in vivo-derived embryos (72.7%) when compared to in vitro-derived embryos (51.4%), respectively (P<0.05). In conclusion, our results indicate that combined use of CRIaa culture medium with vitrification might enhance tolerance of cryopreservation for bovine IVF embryo production.

Keywords

References

  1. Aoyagi K, ITO H, Saitou M, Kanauchi T, Kobayashi M and Hoshi H. 1999. In vitro development and production of Offspring from bovine nuclear transfer embryo cultured in aserum- free medium. J. Reprod. Dev. 45:129-134. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.45.129
  2. Arav A, Yavin S, Zeron Y, Natan D, Dekel I and Gacitua H. 2002. Newtrends in gamete's cryopreservation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 187:77-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00700-6
  3. Baka SG, Toth TL, Veeck LL, Jones Jr HW, Muasher SJ and Lanzendorf SE. 1995. Evaluation of the spindle apparatus of in-vitro matured human oocytes following cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod. 10:1816-1820.
  4. Chen C. 1988. Pregnancies after human oocyte cryopreservation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 541-549.
  5. Cho SK, Cho SG, Bae lH, Park CS and Kong IK. 2002. Improvement in post-thaw viability of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts vitrified by glass micropipette (GMP). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 73: 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00132-X
  6. Cremades N, Sousa M, Silva J, Viana P, Sousa S, Oliveira C, Teixeira da Silva J and Barros A. 2004. Experimental vitrification of human compacted morulae and early blastocysts using fine diameter plastic micropipettes. Hum. Reprod. 19: 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh059
  7. Damien M, Luciano AA and Peluso JJ. 1990. Propanediol alters intracellular pH and developmental potential of mouse zygotes independently of volume change. Hum. Reprod. 5: 212-216.
  8. Falming ML and Garcia MA. 1992. Status of cryopreservation of embryos from domestic animals. Cryobiology 29:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90002-J
  9. Gook DA, Osborn SM and Johnston WI. 1993. Parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes following cryopreservation using 1,2-propanediol. Hum. Reprod. 10:654-658.
  10. Gray CW, Morgan PM and Kane MT. 1992. Purification of an embryotrophic factor from commercial bovine serum albumin and its identification as citrate. J. Reprod. Fertil. 94: 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0940471
  11. Hunter JE, Bernard A, Fuller B, Amso N and Shaw RW. 1991. Fertilization and development of the human oocyte following exposure to cryoprotectants, low temperatures and cryopreservation: A comparison of two techniques. Hum. Reprod. 6:1460-1465.
  12. Hunter JE, Fuller BJ, Bemard A, Jackson A and Shaw RW. 1995. Vitrification of human oocytes following minimal exposure to cryoprotectants; initial studies on fertilization and embryonic development. Hum. Reprod. 10:1184-1188.
  13. Iwasaki S, Yoshikane Y, Li X, Watanabe S. and Nakahara T. 1994. Effects of freezing of bovine preirnplantation embryos derived from oocytes fertilized in vitro on survival of their inner cell mass cells. Mole. Reprod. and Develop. 37:272-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080370305
  14. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S and Kato O. 2005. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod. Biomed. 11:608-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61169-8
  15. Lane M, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK and Phil D. 1999. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil. Steril. 72:1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00418-5
  16. Leibo SP, Martino A, Kobayashi S and Pollard JW. 1996. stagedependent sensitivity of oocytes and embryos to low temperatures. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 42:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01543-6
  17. Leibo SP, Loskutoff NM. 1993. Cryobiology of in vitro derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology 39:81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90025-Z
  18. Martino A, Songsasen N and Leibo SP. 1996. Developmental into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultrarapid cooling. BioI. Reprod. 54:1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.5.1059
  19. Massip A, Mermillod P and Dhmyes A. 1995. Morphology and biochemistry of in-vitro produced bovine: Implications for their cryopreservation. Human Reproduction 10:3004-3011.
  20. Misumi K, Suzuki M, Sato S and Saito N. 2003. Successful production of piglets derived from vitrified morulae and early blastocysts using a microdroplet method. Theriogenology 60:253-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01364-X
  21. Niemann H. 1991. Cryopreservation of ova and embryos from livestock current status and research needs. Theriogenology 35:109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90151-3
  22. Pereira PV, Dayan A, Watanabe MR, Avila FM, Marchizeli JC, Accorsi MF and Watanabe YF. 2002. Pregancy rate following transfer of cryopreservation in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 57:475.
  23. Rall WF. 1992. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos: methods and applications. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 28:237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(92)90110-Y
  24. Rall, WF and Fahy GM. 1985. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -$196^{\circ}C$ by vitrification. Nature 313:573-575. https://doi.org/10.1038/313573a0
  25. Rios GL, Mucci NC, Kaiser GG and Alberio RH. 2010. Effect of container, vitrification volume and warming solution on cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Animal Reprod. Sci. 118: 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.015
  26. Rizos D, Lonergan P, Ward F. Papadopoulos S and Boland MP. 2002. Developmental, qualitative and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 62:320-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10138
  27. Semple ME, Betteridge KJ and Leibo SP. 1995. Cryopreservation of in vitro-derived bovine embryos produced in a serum-free culture system. Theriogenology 43:320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)92474-N
  28. Sommerfeld V and Niemann H. 1999. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification. Cryobiology 38:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2159
  29. Suzuki T, Takagi M, Yamamoto M, Boediono A, Saha S, Sakakibara H and Ooe M. 1993. Pregnancy rate and survival in culture of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos frozen in various cryoprotectants and thawed usinga one-step system. Theriogenology 40:651-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90417-4
  30. Szell A, Shelton JN and Szell K. 1989. Osmotic characteristics of sheep and cattle embryos. Cryobiology 26(3):297-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(89)90026-6
  31. Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, Booth PJ, Jacobsen H, Greve T and Callensen H. 1998. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: A new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 51:53-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1<53::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-V
  32. Wilmut I, Rowson LEA. 1973. Experiments on the low-temperature preservation of cow embryos. Vet. Rec. 92, 686-690. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.92.26.686
  33. Wolfe J, Bryant G. 2001. Cellular cryobiology: Thermodynamic and mechanical effects. Int. J. Refrig. 24, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(00)00027-X
  34. Wurth YA, Reinders JMC, Rall WF and Kruip TAM. 1994. Developmental potential of in vitro produced bovine embryos following cryopreservation and single-embryo transfer. Theriogenology 42:1275-1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90247-G
  35. Yang DS, Dhlohm PL, Winslow L and Cramer L. 1998. A twin pregnancy after microinjection of human cryopreserved oocyte with a specially developed oocyte cryopreservation regime. Fertil. Steril. 70:S239.