DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Analysis of Discourse Types and Meaning-making Strategies Used by a Beginning Teacher in Secondary Science Class

담화양상과 의미형성전략에 관한 초임 교사의 중등 과학수업 사례 탐색

  • Kim, Hye-Ree (Yongindaedeok Middle School) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Kyung (BK21 Science Education for the Next Society, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Jong (Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University)
  • 김혜리 (용인대덕중학교) ;
  • 이선경 (서울대학교 BK21 미래사회과학교육연구사업단) ;
  • 김찬종 (서울대학교 지구과학교육과)
  • Received : 2010.06.15
  • Accepted : 2010.10.14
  • Published : 2010.10.31

Abstract

This study analyzed discourse types and meaning making strategies used in a secondary beginning science teacher's class. A voluntary middle school science teacher participated in this study, and her instruction was observed and videotaped. The analysis consisted of two parts. First, we categorized the types of discourses occurred in class. Second, we examined her instructional strategies used through meaning making practices at the micro-level. Results indicated that there were five episodes emerged representing different discourse types and meaning making strategies in the beginning teacher's lesson about 'the pathway and property of light'. Conclusion and implications for further study and teacher professional development were presented in the paper.

본 연구의 목적은 중등과학수업에서 나타나는 담화양상과 의미형성 전략을 분석하는 것이다. 연구 참여 교사는 서울의 한 중학교에서 과학을 가르치고 있었으며, 연구에 자발적으로 참여하였다. 연구진은 참여교사의 수업을 관찰하고 비디오 녹화하였고 전사하였다. 자료는 두 단계로 분석되었다. 첫 단계에서는 담화 양상을 범주화하였다. 두 번째 단계에서는 미시적 수준에서 의미형성 전략을 확인하였다. 연구 결과로서, 초임교사의 '빛의 경로와 성질' 단원의 과학 수업담화에서 나타난 담화양상과 의미형성 전략에 관하여 5개의 에피소드가 제시되었다. 연구결과를 토대로, 결론 및 후속연구와 교사전문성 발달에 관한 시사점이 탐색되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고창규, 2006, 수업대화 분석틀의 비교 연구. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6, 113-144.
  2. Alexander, R., 2001, Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 642 p.
  3. Carlsen, W.S., 1991, Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic approach. In Brophy, J.E. (ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 2. JAI Press, CT, USA, 115-143.
  4. Carlsen, W.S., 1992, Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 15-21.
  5. Hanrahan, M.U., 2005, Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90, 8-43.
  6. Kelly, G.J. and Brown, C., 2003, Communicative Demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students' construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13, 483-532.
  7. Lemke, J.L., 1990, Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex, NJ, USA, 263 p.
  8. Mortimer, E.F. and Scott, P.H., 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, 141 p.
  9. Ritchie, S.M., Tobin, K., and Hook, K.S., 1997, Teaching referents and the warrants used to test the viability of students' mental models: Is there a link? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199703)34:3<223::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U
  10. Ritchie, S.M. and Tobin, K., 2001, Actions and discourse for transformative understanding in a middle school science class. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750066529
  11. Scott, P.H., Mortimer, E.F., and Aguiar, O.G., 2006, The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
  12. Wells, G., 1999, Putting a tool to different uses: A reevaluation of the IRF sequence. In Wells, G. (ed.), Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 167-208.

Cited by

  1. Exploration of Discursive-Epistemic Mechanisms in High School Earth Science Lessons vol.36, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.4.390